Leila de Lima engagement report
@manayleila - 214K followers on X
Measured over 46 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 4, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 298 interactions against 214K followers, an engagement rate of 0.139%. Measured over 46 original posts, its engagement rate beats 66% of 19,932 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 7.3K times each, and 4.09% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.40% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.2 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 46 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video, 15% are part of a thread and 17% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 12K interactions, about 39x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #awesambar2026, #justiceforejkvictims, #supremecourtph.
Measured over 46 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 4, 2026. Recurring tags: #awesambar2026, #justiceforejkvictims, #supremecourtph.
Compared with accounts its own size
Leila de Lima's engagement rate beats 66% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (19,932 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 83% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.139%, Leila de Lima sits above the 25th percentile of the 201,342 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.141%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.024% |
| 50th percentile | 0.141% |
| 75th percentile | 0.671% |
| 90th percentile | 2.53% |
| 99th percentile | 82.4% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 14:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 100% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 17% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | +15% | +14% to +16% | 32K |
- 100% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 17% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
- Its average post runs 771 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Sep 5, 202639x their median
https://t.co/sZ2mVruxbK
- Sep 30, 202619x their median
https://t.co/wtth3NT5eX
- Sep 4, 202615x their median
BREAKING: Quezon City Regional Trial Court, nag-isyu ng warrant of arrest laban kay Vice President Sara Duterte kaugnay ng grave threats case nito, ayon sa abogadong si Paul Lawrence Lim, counsel ni VP Sara Duterte. "Regardless of the question on jurisdiction, she has no intention of evading the law and will continue to exercise all her legal remedies," dagdag ni Lim. Abangan ang detayle sa https://t.co/KqDTBMbTQD.
- Sep 20, 202611x their median
Tigilan ang paniniktik at panggigipit kay Ka Daning Ramos! Ang pagmamanman, pananakot at pagbabanta sa mga lider magsasaka tulad ni Ka Daning ay hindi lamang paglabag sa kanilang karapatang ipahayag ang hinaing at kritisismo sa gobyerno, kundi isa ring hayagang pagsupil sa ating demokrasya. Tigilan ang harassment at red-tagging sa mga nakikipaglaban para sa mga magsasaka, sa mga tagapagtanggol ng karapatang-pantao, at naghahanap ng pananagutan sa malawakang katiwalian sa pamahalaan. #HandsOffDaniloRamos #StopRedTagging 📸 KMP https://t.co/lag3EOXNUw
- Aug 27, 20267.1x their median
Maraming salamat, Sen. @risahontiveros!!! 💖🤗✨ https://t.co/X36nINC8jS
- Sep 6, 20266.3x their median
Hindi ka biktima. May pananagutan ka. https://t.co/bqx09Yo2HO
- Sep 8, 20265.5x their median
Happy Birthday, our Blessed Mama Mary! 💙🙏 Maraming salamat po sa pagpapadama sa amin ng iyong wagas na pagmamahal, pag-aaruga, at mapagkalingang paggabay. Dalangin po namin na ilawan mo ang aming mga landas, patatagin ang aming mga puso, at akayin kami tungo sa kabutihan at kalooban ng iyong anak na si Hesus. Pray for us, Mama Mary. We love you!
- Sep 16, 20264.9x their median
The #SupremeCourtPH 𝘌𝘯 𝘉𝘢𝘯𝘤, during its session on August 26, 2026, unanimously declared that Article II, Section 26 of the Constitution requires Congress to enact a law prohibiting political dynasties, holding that Congress’ failure to do so for 39 years constitutes grave abuse of discretion. The Court directed Congress to comply with its mandatory constitutional duty to enact an anti-political dynasty law at the earliest opportunity, define political dynasties, and determine the scope of the prohibition. In a Decision penned by Associate Justice Ramon Paul L. Hernando, the Court 𝘌𝘯 𝘉𝘢𝘯𝘤 granted the consolidated petitions in G.R. Nos. 263934, 272370, and 279201 for certiorari and mandamus. The petitions challenged Congress’ prolonged failure to pass a law defining and prohibiting political dynasties. The Court strongly urged Congress to heed its constitutional duty with utmost urgency, as it declared that the latter has “the MANDATORY CONSTITUTIONAL DUTY to enact the law on the constitutional prohibition against political dynasties as expressly provided for in Article II, Section 26 of the Constitution.” It stated that the Congress “MUST HENCEFORTH AND WITH UTMOST URGENCY ENACT THE APPROPRIATE ANTI-POLITICAL DYNASTY LAW AT THE EARLIEST OPPORTUNITY.” Article II, Section 26 of the Constitution provides that “The State shall guarantee equal access to opportunities for public service, and prohibit political dynasties as may be defined by law.” The Court held that this provision is not merely an aspiration but a constitutional command. The use of the word “shall” makes clear that the State has a mandatory duty both to guarantee equal access to public service and to prohibit political dynasties. The Court also held that the phrase “as may be defined by law” does not give Congress the choice whether to prohibit political dynasties. Rather, it gives Congress the authority to define what constitutes a political dynasty and determine the scope of the prohibition. The Court further said that Congress’ prolonged failure to enact an anti-political dynasty law constitutes grave abuse of discretion. The Court took judicial notice of the numerous anti-political dynasty bills filed but left unacted upon since the ratification of the 1987 Constitution. It also considered studies on the prevalence of political dynasties and their relationship with socioeconomic conditions in the country. The Court noted that political dynasties have remained widespread and have extended even into the party-list system. Despite changes in the composition of Congress over the years, no comprehensive anti-political dynasty law has been enacted, implying either a lack of interest, avoidance for convenience, or service of self-interest. Although the Constitution does not set a deadline for Congress to enact the law, the Court held that this does not allow Congress to postpone its constitutional duty indefinitely. The Court found that 39 years is beyond a reasonable period to carry out the constitutional command. Congress’ continued inaction therefore constitutes a continuing violation of its constitutional duty. Read the full text of the Press Briefer at: https://t.co/Jnz0FRrffr. Read the full text of the Decision at: https://t.co/KwcumhTagm. Read Senior Associate Justice Marvic M.V.F. Leonen’s Concurring Opinion at: https://t.co/oA3HGjjrbK. Read Associate Justice Henri Jean Paul B. Inting Concurring Opinion at: https://t.co/ja1UDoGn53. Read Associate Justice Rodil V. Zalameda’s Separate Opinion at: https://t.co/Cy4fa9d7iI. Read Associate Justice Japar B. Dimaampao’s Separate Concurring Opinion at: https://t.co/9pWVa3WW4i. Read Associate Justice Maria Filomena D. Singh’s Separate Opinion at: https://t.co/J91UOofGV5 Read Associate Justice Raul B. Villanueva’s Separate Concurring Opinion at: https://t.co/vNH6FDS5oe. Copying of this content is subject to the SC PIO’s Credit Attribution Policy: https://t.co/F48RF1vtzZ.
- Aug 27, 20264.1x their median
From the bottom of my heart, THANK YOU SO MUCH. You made my special day really beautiful. 💞🥰 https://t.co/NjtRttekH8
- Sep 16, 20263.9x their median
Hearing the insights and wisdom of amici curiae or “friends of the court” – retired Chief Justices Artemio Panganiban, Reynato Puno and Hilario Davide Jr. (through his legal memorandum), and retired Associate Justice Adolf Azcuna – today on the voting threshold for conviction in impeachment reminded me of our Constitutional Law classes in law school. Daming na-refresh na law concepts and relevant jurisprudence.🧐📖 We thank our former Supreme Court Justices for lending their time, knowledge, and expertise to shed light on this crucial issue in our pursuit of truth and accountability. ⚖️ 📸 Wendell Alinea, Joseph Vidal | Senate Social Media Unit
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Recurring topics
The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 298 interactions against 214K followers, an engagement rate of 0.139%. Measured over 46 original posts, its engagement rate beats 66% of 19,932 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 7.3K times each, and 4.09% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.40% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.2 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 46 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video, 15% are part of a thread and 17% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 12K interactions, about 39x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #awesambar2026, #justiceforejkvictims, #supremecourtph.
- What is Leila de Lima's engagement rate on X?
- Leila de Lima (@manayleila) has an engagement rate of 0.139%, based on the median interactions across 46 original posts from the last 30 days against 214,356 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.139%, Leila de Lima sits above the 25th percentile of the 201,342 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @manayleila have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 66% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (19,932 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @manayleila post?
- Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.2 posts per day across the measured window.