Back to @madeiradez's profile

Doctor Wood engagement report

@madeiradez - 161K followers on X

Measured over 30 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 25, 2026.

Engagement

Top quarter for its size
Per follower
0.354%
of 161K followers
Per impression
4.55%
13K views on a typical post
Reach
7.79%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
571
interactions (median)
Saved
0.068%
8 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
2.4/day
active 50% of days
Peak time
00:00 UTC
Sunday

A typical post picks up 571 interactions against 161K followers, an engagement rate of 0.354%. Measured over 30 original posts, its engagement rate beats 76% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 13K times each, and 4.55% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 7.79% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.4 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 50% of days. Most posts go out around 00:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 30 posts sampled, 27% carry an image or video, 10% are part of a thread and 13% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 68K interactions, about 118x its own typical post.

Measured over 30 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 25, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Doctor Wood's engagement rate beats 76% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 8 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 84% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.354%, Doctor Wood sits above the 50th percentile of the 205,261 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.143% to 0.678%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,261 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,894 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 00:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 00:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 00:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Sunday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Sunday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video27% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link13% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 27% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 13% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 142 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Oct 25, 2026118x their median

    O vídeo do momento em que o Neymar vai falar com o Nestor, que não estava muito afim de papo. Depois volta, coloca a mão na boca e o Nestor fala pro árbitro. como não é mais permitido colocar a mão na boca em situações de discussão, o Neymar foi EXPULSO https://t.co/6vBh7OfaKG

    63K2.2K1.3K1.4K2.4M viewsView on X
  • Oct 17, 202639x their median

    Retirar a marcação das balas dificulta punir quem desviou as balas. Ajuda o crime organizado

    19K3.7K106146549K viewsView on X
  • Oct 24, 202613x their median

    cara e realmente o cazé conseguiu desaparecer sem falar um A nessas eleições né

    7.0K170144133178K viewsView on X
  • Oct 25, 20266.5x their median

    Votei. A impressão que estou é que tem mais gente votando neste turno. Bate com a impressão de voces?

    3.3K1042441695K viewsView on X
  • Sep 13, 20266.0x their median

    Alguem me indicou este livro. Aceitei o conselho de um total estranho e comprei. Nao terminei mas ja comecei a distribuir para as pessoas. É um livro que é um afago no coração. Leiam. E recomendem livros aleatórios para estranhos. Ps - temos Filó ao fundo https://t.co/4tOP2ykDkq

    3.2K150521067K viewsView on X
  • Sep 12, 20265.4x their median

    La "desaceleración de la IA" es un engaño contable. Te están vendiendo una "pausa en la IA por seguridad". Mentira!!!. Nadie frenó nada por el bien de la humanidad. 🤣 Te explico en 4 pasos por qué nos quieren hacer creer que hay una crisis: Va hilo corto y definitivo:

    2.4K47310372445K viewsView on X
  • Sep 12, 20264.3x their median

    ‘Bolo de sucuris’: turistas registram acasalamento de serpentes em rio de MS https://t.co/bmAztqLlsW https://t.co/fGSuuQfxLD

    2.3K755843275K viewsView on X
  • Oct 13, 20263.9x their median

    Tenho chamado a atencao desde o inicio para essa questao do tráfico internacional de pessoas. Espero que agora que veio à luz que seja investigado profundamente

    2.0K17722224K viewsView on X
  • Oct 17, 20263.8x their median

    Renata Lo Prete é MUITO MUITO MUITO boa. Firme sem ser grosseira. Assertiva. Educada. Que baita jornalista

    2.0K100821536K viewsView on X
  • Oct 15, 20263.7x their median

    Vendo tudo isso que esta aparecendo no celular do Vorcaro eu lembrei que ele nao quis comprar um quadro pois alegou ser evangélico. Nada contra a religião, tudo contra o fariseu. Alias, o novo testamento todo é contra o fariseu O moralista é um dos piores seres que existe

    1.9K24014820K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 571 interactions against 161K followers, an engagement rate of 0.354%. Measured over 30 original posts, its engagement rate beats 76% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 13K times each, and 4.55% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 7.79% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.4 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 50% of days. Most posts go out around 00:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 30 posts sampled, 27% carry an image or video, 10% are part of a thread and 13% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 68K interactions, about 118x its own typical post.

What is Doctor Wood's engagement rate on X?
Doctor Wood (@madeiradez) has an engagement rate of 0.354%, based on the median interactions across 30 original posts from the last 30 days against 161,115 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.354%, Doctor Wood sits above the 50th percentile of the 205,261 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @madeiradez have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 76% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the top quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @madeiradez post?
Most posts go out around 00:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.4 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going