Doctor Wood engagement report
@madeiradez - 161K followers on X
Measured over 30 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 25, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 571 interactions against 161K followers, an engagement rate of 0.354%. Measured over 30 original posts, its engagement rate beats 76% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 13K times each, and 4.55% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 7.79% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.4 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 50% of days. Most posts go out around 00:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 30 posts sampled, 27% carry an image or video, 10% are part of a thread and 13% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 68K interactions, about 118x its own typical post.
Measured over 30 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 25, 2026.
Compared with accounts its own size
Doctor Wood's engagement rate beats 76% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 8 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 84% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.354%, Doctor Wood sits above the 50th percentile of the 205,261 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.143% to 0.678%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.024% |
| 50th percentile | 0.143% |
| 75th percentile | 0.678% |
| 90th percentile | 2.55% |
| 99th percentile | 82.4% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 00:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 27% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 13% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | -3% | -3% to -2% | 54K |
- 27% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 13% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
- Its average post runs 142 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Oct 25, 2026118x their median
O vídeo do momento em que o Neymar vai falar com o Nestor, que não estava muito afim de papo. Depois volta, coloca a mão na boca e o Nestor fala pro árbitro. como não é mais permitido colocar a mão na boca em situações de discussão, o Neymar foi EXPULSO https://t.co/6vBh7OfaKG
- Oct 17, 202639x their median
Retirar a marcação das balas dificulta punir quem desviou as balas. Ajuda o crime organizado
- Oct 24, 202613x their median
cara e realmente o cazé conseguiu desaparecer sem falar um A nessas eleições né
- Oct 25, 20266.5x their median
Votei. A impressão que estou é que tem mais gente votando neste turno. Bate com a impressão de voces?
- Sep 13, 20266.0x their median
Alguem me indicou este livro. Aceitei o conselho de um total estranho e comprei. Nao terminei mas ja comecei a distribuir para as pessoas. É um livro que é um afago no coração. Leiam. E recomendem livros aleatórios para estranhos. Ps - temos Filó ao fundo https://t.co/4tOP2ykDkq
- Sep 12, 20265.4x their median
La "desaceleración de la IA" es un engaño contable. Te están vendiendo una "pausa en la IA por seguridad". Mentira!!!. Nadie frenó nada por el bien de la humanidad. 🤣 Te explico en 4 pasos por qué nos quieren hacer creer que hay una crisis: Va hilo corto y definitivo:
- Sep 12, 20264.3x their median
‘Bolo de sucuris’: turistas registram acasalamento de serpentes em rio de MS https://t.co/bmAztqLlsW https://t.co/fGSuuQfxLD
- Oct 13, 20263.9x their median
Tenho chamado a atencao desde o inicio para essa questao do tráfico internacional de pessoas. Espero que agora que veio à luz que seja investigado profundamente
- Oct 17, 20263.8x their median
Renata Lo Prete é MUITO MUITO MUITO boa. Firme sem ser grosseira. Assertiva. Educada. Que baita jornalista
- Oct 15, 20263.7x their median
Vendo tudo isso que esta aparecendo no celular do Vorcaro eu lembrei que ele nao quis comprar um quadro pois alegou ser evangélico. Nada contra a religião, tudo contra o fariseu. Alias, o novo testamento todo é contra o fariseu O moralista é um dos piores seres que existe
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 571 interactions against 161K followers, an engagement rate of 0.354%. Measured over 30 original posts, its engagement rate beats 76% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 13K times each, and 4.55% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 7.79% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.4 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 50% of days. Most posts go out around 00:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 30 posts sampled, 27% carry an image or video, 10% are part of a thread and 13% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 68K interactions, about 118x its own typical post.
- What is Doctor Wood's engagement rate on X?
- Doctor Wood (@madeiradez) has an engagement rate of 0.354%, based on the median interactions across 30 original posts from the last 30 days against 161,115 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.354%, Doctor Wood sits above the 50th percentile of the 205,261 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @madeiradez have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 76% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the top quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @madeiradez post?
- Most posts go out around 00:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.4 posts per day across the measured window.