Back to @lvjin1993's profile

Li Mengbai engagement report

@lvjin1993 - 238K followers on X

Measured over 80 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 30, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.018%
of 238K followers
Per impression
0.554%
7.6K views on a typical post
Reach
3.20%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
42
interactions (median)
Saved
0.04%
3 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
2.67/day
active 20% of days
Peak time
22:00 UTC
Tuesday

A typical post picks up 42 interactions against 238K followers, an engagement rate of 0.018%. Measured over 80 original posts, its engagement rate beats 31% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 7.6K times each, and 0.554% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.19% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.7 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 20% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 22:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 80 posts sampled, 69% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 2.4K interactions, about 57x its own typical post.

Measured over 80 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 30, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Li Mengbai's engagement rate beats 31% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 28% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.018%, Li Mengbai sits above the 10th percentile of the 205,475 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.024%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,475 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,893 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 22:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 22:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 22:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Tuesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Tuesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video69% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 69% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 99 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 29, 202657x their median

    利用现有材料建造出温馨的小窝~ https://t.co/Y89JVnnKQ0

    2.1K1709411750K viewsView on X
  • Sep 29, 20267.7x their median

    屋主好聪明这样栽树摘果子方便,而且树太珍贵,放在外边容易丢😂 https://t.co/gKvScPrOed

    2912011061K viewsView on X
  • Sep 30, 20264.5x their median

    牙签看似脆弱,为什么能切断铁管? https://t.co/kDeCX2Elwd

    1551715022K viewsView on X
  • Sep 10, 20264.0x their median

    一卡一胶,轻松取出充电宝! https://t.co/7WeLo3d3E1

    648962122K viewsView on X
  • Sep 10, 20263.5x their median

    用液压机压熟花生,直接压出了花生渣,为什么没有油流出来? https://t.co/ybdNSfuD3V

    612851197K viewsView on X
  • Sep 10, 20263.4x their median

    我当年世界杯期间在尼斯出差,晚上进了家家庭小酒馆,一群糙汉子挤在那看球。我看气氛热了,就摇铃请客,给在座每人来一杯3.5欧的扎啤。 那帮壮汉瞬间炸了,喊我"兄弟",塞炸鸡薯条给我跟我疯狂碰杯。老板老板娘也来 套近乎,法国赢球时差点把我抛起来。 前后才花60多欧,情绪价值直接拉满。看完球,被他们簇拥着送出门,都说我,给了他们一辈子难忘的夜晚,还送我钥匙扣、冰箱贴,我当场就成了酒馆大明星。 你说请女生AA,能有这一半的情绪价值不?

    13246118K viewsView on X
  • Sep 29, 20263.3x their median

    咱的字是写出来的,人家的字是画出来的~🤔 https://t.co/up0CLv0KBf

    1041120243K viewsView on X
  • Sep 10, 20263.1x their median

    以前我也是个电工,也是这样干活,后来老板说我磨洋工,就被开除了😟 https://t.co/YzDxAyY4Rh

    103920072K viewsView on X
  • Sep 30, 20263.0x their median

    犹豫就会败北,妈妈反应有点迟钝了,万幸没啥大碍😱 https://t.co/ysJim1eqpt

    105815062K viewsView on X
  • Sep 10, 20263.0x their median

    太失败了!我是一个加我的都没有😟 https://t.co/7BN3BAwhE3

    55071011K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 42 interactions against 238K followers, an engagement rate of 0.018%. Measured over 80 original posts, its engagement rate beats 31% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 7.6K times each, and 0.554% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.19% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.7 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 20% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 22:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 80 posts sampled, 69% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 2.4K interactions, about 57x its own typical post.

What is Li Mengbai's engagement rate on X?
Li Mengbai (@lvjin1993) has an engagement rate of 0.018%, based on the median interactions across 80 original posts from the last 30 days against 237,632 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.018%, Li Mengbai sits above the 10th percentile of the 205,475 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @lvjin1993 have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 31% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @lvjin1993 post?
Most posts go out around 22:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.67 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going