luis novaresio engagement report
@luisnovaresio - 976K followers on X
Measured over 15 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 11, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 15 interactions against 976K followers, an engagement rate of 0.002%. Measured over 15 original posts, its engagement rate beats 14% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 9.6K times each, and 0.156% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.983% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.3 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 60% of days. Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 15 posts sampled, 33% carry an image or video and 73% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 2.4K interactions, about 158x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #lacumbre, #lanochedemirtha, #lanochedeml.
Measured over 15 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 11, 2026. Recurring tags: #lacumbre, #lanochedemirtha, #lanochedeml.
Compared with accounts its own size
luis novaresio's engagement rate beats 14% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 11% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.002%, luis novaresio sits below the 10th percentile of the 205,048 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.024%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.024% |
| 50th percentile | 0.143% |
| 75th percentile | 0.678% |
| 90th percentile | 2.55% |
| 99th percentile | 82.4% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 16:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 33% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 73% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | -3% | -3% to -2% | 54K |
- 33% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 73% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
- Its average post runs 111 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Aug 17, 2026158x their median
Todas las críticas a Cecilia Roth como Moria son el signo de que vivimos la etapa más estúpida y literal de la historia. Una biopic no es un sketch de Fátima Florez.
- Aug 6, 2026148x their median
Involucrado el ministro de Salud, Mario Lugones. Las exfuncionarias están complicadísimas. Una declaró que Lugones sabía lo que hicieron. Dos datos importantes. Primero, ex post se supone que "se hizo" una investigación administrativa interna. Ningún resultado conocido. Segundo, a ninguna la separaron de su cargo hasta meses después de conocido lo que pasó. De hecho, Bisio siguió hasta enero de este año. Secuestraron pruebas en las dependencias de la cartera. La pregunta es si le pusieron un precio a todo lo que hicieron por la mafia de HLB Pharma.
- Aug 8, 2026103x their median
🔴AHORA | Murió Jorge Messi, el papá de Lionel Messi https://t.co/Pq1Rtg6u17 https://t.co/nKwqTxpWB8
- Aug 11, 202688x their median
Durante este tiempo he visto de todo, y más, en la Cámara de Diputados. Pero nunca había visto algo como lo de hoy: los libertarios y algunos aliados en la Comisión de Cultura se negaron a firmar proyectos que reconocían o destacaban al escritor Juan José Saer y al Monumento Natural de la Quebrada de Humahuaca por el solo hecho de que el autor de las iniciativas era un opositor. Insólito. Más incomprensible aún cuando se trata de Juan José Saer, considerado por muchos como uno de los más grandes escritores argentinos, a la altura de Borges, Bioy Casares, Arlt o Andrés Rivera, entre otros.
- Aug 22, 202680x their median
Algunos panelistas reaccionaron de una manera desproporcionada a la afirmación que hizo el presidente de que los abortos habrían contribuido en los últimos años a la caída de los nacimientos en Argentina. Sin citar datos, sostuvieron que el aborto no es una de las causas de la merma de nacimientos. Lo cierto es que, al menos en las palabras dichas, el presidente no dijo que el aborto era la causa, sino que “también” era una de las causas (al final, la transcripción textual de lo que dijo Milei). Los datos hablan: el aborto sí es una de las causas de la caída de nacimientos, como demuestra el número de 107.505 abortos realizados en el país y registrados oficialmente en 2023 solo en centros públicos de salud, es decir, que la cifra debe ser considerablemente mayor si se suman los centros privados que no documentaron sus abortos. Repasando: sí es cierto que el aborto contribuyó a la actual caída de la natalidad, aunque no sea la única causa. Los más de cien mil abortos de 2023 significaron cien mil nacimientos menos, y hoy 100 mil chicos menos que deberían estar en sala de 3 años. La frase “nos está costando caro en términos de crecimiento” es estrictamente correcta. Por otro lado, si la reacción se debió a la frase del presidente “pasión por asesinar niños en el vientre”, puedo comprender y adherir a la idea de que no todas las mujeres que abortan lo hacen con indolencia. Pero creo interpretar, que el presidente no se refería a las mujeres que abortan, sino a los movimientos proaborto que de verdad han mostrado una “pasión” por alentar el sacrificio de seres humanos. Me quedo con esto. El aborto sí es una causa de la reducción de los nacimientos. Negarlo no lo hace menos cierto. No es la única y lo sabemos. Las reacciones indignadas responden a un marco ideológico, no a los hechos. Lo que dijo Milei: “Por otro lado, también, digamos, si la caracterización del crecimiento es desde los rendimientos crecientes y el capital tiene importancia, obviamente también tiene importancia lo que pase en el mercado de trabajo y, muy especialmente, lo que pase con la población. Y de hecho, estamos pagando muy caro la locura de los pañuelitos verdes. Digamos, hoy Argentina no llega a una tasa de crecimiento de la población y de natalidad que permita la reposición. Por lo tanto, digamos, esa pasión por asesinar niños en el vientre de la madre también nos está costando caro en términos de crecimiento, y ni les cuento en términos de sistema previsional, de reposición.”
- Aug 16, 202671x their median
Hay decenas de argumentos para ver la serie de @Moria_Casan Deslumbrante (colosal) laburo de Sofía, histrionismo de Siciliani, tempo dramático único de Cecilia Roth para encaminarte hacia la belleza del cierre de la serie, gloriosa fotografía, colores, puesta, maquetas, cámara y delirio de Van der Couter y más y más. El secreto es uno. Ella está todo el tiempo, en todo momento aunque no se la vea. Es que se la huele, aspira, respira, toca. Crea un universo que amamos. Honra maestra de la amistad, la diversidad, la autoestima y el perdón. Necesito ya salir a bailar con Moria. Chapeau existencial. Le avisan?
- Aug 8, 202667x their median
Que incomodidad y vergüenza me generan quienes ante una muerte hablan de ellos mismos 🤦🏼♀️
- Sep 2, 202648x their median
Caputo pidió paciencia: “Nos deslomamos para que este cambio continúe y se dé para todos”. https://t.co/tQpVpkWiva
- Aug 8, 202647x their median
Ayer fui a la FED. Toda esta gente y editoriales independientes juntas, un viernes a la noche. Una fiesta. Con la derogación de la Ley del Libro, Sturzenegger quiere romper esto: https://t.co/taZPF07nbN
- Aug 12, 202646x their median
NOTICIÓN: Tras la polémica, el gobierno confirmó que la Ley del Libro no se tratará en el Congreso https://t.co/fkfpI07TYe
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Recurring topics
The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 15 interactions against 976K followers, an engagement rate of 0.002%. Measured over 15 original posts, its engagement rate beats 14% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 9.6K times each, and 0.156% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.983% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.3 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 60% of days. Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 15 posts sampled, 33% carry an image or video and 73% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 2.4K interactions, about 158x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #lacumbre, #lanochedemirtha, #lanochedeml.
- What is luis novaresio's engagement rate on X?
- luis novaresio (@luisnovaresio) has an engagement rate of 0.002%, based on the median interactions across 15 original posts from the last 30 days against 975,621 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.002%, luis novaresio sits below the 10th percentile of the 205,048 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @luisnovaresio have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 14% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the bottom quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @luisnovaresio post?
- Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.33 posts per day across the measured window.