Back to @luisevivanco's profile

Luis Eduardo Vivanco engagement report

@luisevivanco - 449K followers on X

Measured over 30 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 29, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.01%
of 449K followers
Per impression
0.294%
15K views on a typical post
Reach
3.33%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
44
interactions (median)
Saved
0.02%
3 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.3/day
active 73% of days
Peak time
23:00 UTC
Thursday

A typical post picks up 44 interactions against 449K followers, an engagement rate of 0.01%. Measured over 30 original posts, its engagement rate beats 30% of 3,862 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 15K times each, and 0.294% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.33% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.3 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 73% of days. Most posts go out around 23:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 30 posts sampled, 77% carry an image or video and 63% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 3.6K interactions, about 81x its own typical post.

Measured over 30 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 29, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Luis Eduardo Vivanco's engagement rate beats 30% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,862 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 7 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 22% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.01%, Luis Eduardo Vivanco sits above the 10th percentile of the 37,350 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.012%.

p100.002%
p250.012%
p50 (median)0.081%
p750.437%
p902.10%
p99159.9%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 37,350 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 106,576 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.012%
50th percentile0.081%
75th percentile0.437%
90th percentile2.10%
99th percentile159.9%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 23:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 23:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 6%Busiest hour: 23:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%52K
01:00 UTC-2%53K
02:00 UTC-3%51K
03:00 UTC-4%55K
04:00 UTC-6%44K
05:00 UTC-4%43K
06:00 UTC-4%49K
07:00 UTC-5%53K
08:00 UTC-4%62K
09:00 UTC-3%71K
10:00 UTC-2%74K
11:00 UTC-3%80K
12:00 UTC-2%88K
13:00 UTC-2%97K
14:00 UTC-4%100K
15:00 UTC-2%103K
16:00 UTC-3%100K
17:00 UTC-3%93K
18:00 UTC-2%87K
19:00 UTC-2%82K
20:00 UTC-1%76K
21:00 UTC-1%67K
22:00 UTC-1%58K
23:00 UTC-1%52K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Thursday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 5%Busiest day: Thursday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%235K
Monday0%296K
Tuesday-3%292K
Wednesday-1%254K
Thursday-2%248K
Friday-3%256K
Saturday+3%230K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Best tweets

  • Apr 14, 201781x their median

    Sobre estos colchones descansa la revolución. https://t.co/ZgpStLDJoY

    1.4K1.8K211182View on X
  • Aug 6, 202652x their median

    🇪🇨🤝🇦🇷 Daniel Noboa y Javier Milei se reúnen en Quito para fortalecer la relación entre Ecuador y Argentina. El presidente de Argentina, Javier Milei, llegó este jueves 6 de agosto al Palacio de Carondelet para cumplir una visita oficial con su homólogo ecuatoriano, Daniel Noboa. 📌 Ambos mandatarios mantendrán una reunión bilateral en la que se prevé la firma de varios instrumentos de cooperación para fortalecer los vínculos políticos, económicos y comerciales entre los dos países. 🤝 La visita se produce un año después del viaje oficial de Daniel Noboa a Buenos Aires, donde ambos gobiernos acordaron profundizar la cooperación bilateral. #DanielNoboa #JavierMilei #Ecuador #Argentina #Carondelet #RelacionesInternacionales #Política

    1.7K28919073108K viewsView on X
  • Aug 20, 202623x their median

    Sensi puede caerte mal, considerar lo que quieras de su gestión. Pero aprovechar la orfandad de dos niños para hacer "política" es un asco.

    714691941594K viewsView on X
  • Aug 19, 20269.8x their median

    El JuanFran de la Foch fue puro bla bla. Finalmente, Juan Guarderas no se inscribió como candidato a alcalde de Quito. Y dijo que no lo hizo porque le pidieron plata. https://t.co/J6jxmfETqA

    1654816453124K viewsView on X
  • Aug 3, 20269.7x their median

    Segundo día de playa. El vendedor de chupetes advierte tras su speech de venta, su pertenencia a un famoso grupo criminal del Ecuador.

    3241883367K viewsView on X
  • Aug 2, 20268.0x their median

    Primer día de playa, primer día de asalto y disparos. 😱

    24918852104K viewsView on X
  • Aug 21, 20267.9x their median

    Si no es por Valle, el Gualaceo de Brasil nos eliminaba en casa.

    3101917221K viewsView on X
  • Aug 2, 20265.8x their median

    🗳️📌 ADN oficializó la reorganización de sus cuadros. Ubidia irá por la Prefectura por su experiencia con la ruralidad, mientras que Harold Burbano liderará la propuesta para la capital tras un acuerdo de “inversión de roles” 📲 https://t.co/bDR5FUp9Ey https://t.co/YsTT9KgXpK

    15423631677K viewsView on X
  • Aug 18, 20263.7x their median

    Gisella lo dice claro, ahora si criticas al Gobierno eres correísta y si reconoces algo bueno, eres gobiernista. Como si ya no se pudiera opinar sin que te metan en un bando. Link del programa completo aquí: https://t.co/aV5TyL2V01 https://t.co/nTni1ArUl4

    1222218118K viewsView on X
  • Aug 17, 20263.5x their median

    El sistema de pagos, enrolamiento, desenrolamiento de Tags del Peaje Guayasamin es una mierda.

    134713021K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 44 interactions against 449K followers, an engagement rate of 0.01%. Measured over 30 original posts, its engagement rate beats 30% of 3,862 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 15K times each, and 0.294% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.33% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.3 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 73% of days. Most posts go out around 23:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 30 posts sampled, 77% carry an image or video and 63% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 3.6K interactions, about 81x its own typical post.

What is Luis Eduardo Vivanco's engagement rate on X?
Luis Eduardo Vivanco (@luisevivanco) has an engagement rate of 0.01%, based on the median interactions across 30 original posts from the last 30 days against 448,779 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.01%, Luis Eduardo Vivanco sits above the 10th percentile of the 37,350 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @luisevivanco have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 30% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,862 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @luisevivanco post?
Most posts go out around 23:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.3 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going