Back to @lucy_guo's profile

Lucy Guo engagement report

@lucy_guo - 88K followers on X

Measured over 8 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 30, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.126%
of 88K followers
Per impression
0.843%
13K views on a typical post
Reach
15.0%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
110
interactions (median)
Saved
0.073%
10 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.57/day
active 33% of days
Peak time
01:00 UTC
Monday

A typical post picks up 110 interactions against 88K followers, an engagement rate of 0.126%. Measured over 8 original posts, its engagement rate beats 55% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 13K times each, and 0.843% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 14.8% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.57 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 33% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 01:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 8 posts sampled, 88% carry an image or video and 50% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 18K interactions, about 163x its own typical post.

Measured over 8 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 30, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Lucy Guo's engagement rate beats 55% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 7 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 36% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.126%, Lucy Guo sits above the 25th percentile of the 212,656 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.025% to 0.146%.

p100.004%
p250.025%
p50 (median)0.146%
p750.697%
p902.61%
p9982.9%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 212,656 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,418 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.025%
50th percentile0.146%
75th percentile0.697%
90th percentile2.61%
99th percentile82.9%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 01:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 01:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 01:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Monday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Monday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video88% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 88% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 123 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Dec 2, 2025163x their median

    JUST IN: Kalshi co-founder Luana Lopes Lara becomes the youngest self-made female billionaire in history, surpassing Taylor Swift and Lucy Guo. https://t.co/E1wTXyu9H7

    15K9509625717.3M viewsView on X
  • Dec 2, 2025113x their median

    Anthropic is acquiring @bunjavascript to further accelerate Claude Code’s growth. We're delighted that Bun—which has dramatically improved the JavaScript and TypeScript developer experience—is joining us to make Claude Code even better. Read more: https://t.co/aQd3XRdUfR

    9.3K1.0K7081.3K7.8M viewsView on X
  • Nov 17, 202521x their median

    Today, Ramp raised another $300M at a $32B valuation. In the past year our revenue has doubled to over $1B, growing 10x faster than the median public SaaS. We all know money talks — we're teaching it to think. Getting big no longer means getting slow. https://t.co/WL96nH8wtl

    2.8K1682381893.4M viewsView on X
  • Aug 13, 202626x their median

    Everyone's trying to find a man in finance, 6' 5", blue eyes, trust fund. But the hardest criteria I've found with dating is finding someone happy. Truly happy, loving life, filled with optimism, and grateful for everything. By far rarer than hot billionaires.

    2.5K9617459362K viewsView on X
  • Feb 28, 202416x their median

    Announcing our $40M Series A led by @bondcap with @moodrowghani joining our board! After just 14 months, we’ve paid out tens of millions to ~1000 creators. They’ve bought houses, paid off loans, and quit their day jobs because of Passes. With this Series A, we’re building even more revenue streams so creators can make & manage generational wealth. We’re excited to support this generation’s entrepreneurs 🚀 https://t.co/Wmu9puq523

    1.5K70191331.0M viewsView on X
  • Nov 27, 20258.2x their median

    “You got lucky” No, I choose to wake up at 6 am over thanksgiving (and everyday), triple barrys, and work instead of rotting on couches and doom scrolling TikTok https://t.co/NQuN79oSpj

    7899928231K viewsView on X
  • Jul 10, 20266.8x their median

    I want to see you drop to the beat, no sleep. I want to see you pop, champagne on me. My first original song is out now: https://t.co/HMGeASn0BP 🥂🍾 https://t.co/PGABqYrqd6

    5963195221.8M viewsView on X
  • Nov 27, 20256.5x their median

    People > Ideas for early stage investing. Invested in a long time friend / old business partner. He spent literally a decade working on ideas and pivoting. Hardest working guy I knew. 20 hr days, never burnt out. Engineer by trade, taught himself design. He just got offered a HUGE exit. I always knew. 🥹

    6601734795K viewsView on X
  • Nov 26, 20254.5x their median

    Hiring is the #1 indicator of if a company will do well long term. Was about to make an investment and just learned about an extraordinarily questionable executive hire. Aaaaand now I’m out 🫡

    441837785K viewsView on X
  • Aug 14, 20264.4x their median

    Un-beagle-vable day rescuing beagles 🐶 Been working on a documentary (2027) to showcase the horrors of animal testing Beagles are especially vulnerable due to their gentle, trusting, docile nature. The same reasons they make amazing pets. 2,000 saved. Ridglan Farms shut down. https://t.co/Q6jUxUTBHx

    3944148233K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 110 interactions against 88K followers, an engagement rate of 0.126%. Measured over 8 original posts, its engagement rate beats 55% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 13K times each, and 0.843% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 14.8% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.57 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 33% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 01:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 8 posts sampled, 88% carry an image or video and 50% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 18K interactions, about 163x its own typical post.

What is Lucy Guo's engagement rate on X?
Lucy Guo (@lucy_guo) has an engagement rate of 0.126%, based on the median interactions across 8 original posts from the last 30 days against 87,943 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.126%, Lucy Guo sits above the 25th percentile of the 212,656 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @lucy_guo have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 55% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @lucy_guo post?
Most posts go out around 01:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.57 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going