Back to @lucatelese's profile

Luca Telese engagement report

@lucatelese - 331K followers on X

Measured over 14 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 3, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.043%
of 331K followers
Per impression
1.18%
12K views on a typical post
Reach
3.64%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
142
interactions (median)
Saved
0%
0 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.73/day
active 23% of days
Peak time
08:00 UTC
Monday

A typical post picks up 142 interactions against 331K followers, an engagement rate of 0.043%. Measured over 14 original posts, its engagement rate beats 49% of 6,874 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 12K times each, and 1.18% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.64% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.7 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 23% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 08:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 14 posts sampled, 29% carry an image or video, 7% are part of a thread and 29% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 851 interactions, about 6.0x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #inonda, #ranucci, #report.

Measured over 14 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 3, 2026. Recurring tags: #inonda, #ranucci, #report.

Compared with accounts its own size

Luca Telese's engagement rate beats 49% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (6,874 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 8 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 52% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.043%, Luca Telese sits above the 25th percentile of the 66,536 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.016% to 0.1%.

p100.002%
p250.016%
p50 (median)0.1%
p750.5%
p902.09%
p99119.7%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 66,536 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 56,995 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.016%
50th percentile0.1%
75th percentile0.5%
90th percentile2.09%
99th percentile119.7%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 08:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 08:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 08:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Monday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Monday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video29% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link29% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 29% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 29% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 237 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Aug 29, 20266.0x their median

    Così hanno bombardato il primo programma di inchiesta della Rai. Rimuovere la Ranucci, smontare la redazione. #report #ranucci https://t.co/6roA9hE8VV

    349574261922K viewsView on X
  • Aug 29, 20264.9x their median

    In un’ora grave per l’informazione #inonda all’8% con la puntata di ieri. Grazie a tutti, ci vediamo stasera alle 20.40 come sempre. Collegati dal luogo in cui stasera Sigfrido Ranucci andrà in scena . #la7 #ranucci @mariannaaprile

    45154181816K viewsView on X
  • Sep 2, 20264.6x their median

    #Telese ironizza sui successi del governo #Meloni mostrando il caro spesa rispetto al 2021. #Senaldi replica a #Telese: “Se tu parametri al '21 allora l'Italia, perdonami, cresce del 10%” #InOnda @PSenaldi @lucatelese https://t.co/HrV3wMOGSk

    5196665543K viewsView on X
  • Aug 31, 20262.9x their median

    #InOnda “Se la Rai non tornerà sui propri passi, noi ci dimetteremo in blocco” Giulia Innocenzi, giornalista di Report, interviene sul futuro del programma a seguito della decisione della Rai di cambiarne la conduzione https://t.co/01pseBDA4R

    110222652053K viewsView on X
  • Aug 30, 20262.3x their median

    Su La7 In Onda raccoglie 1.026.000 spettatori arrivando al 7.9% di share. Ancora una volta un successo, per la nostra maratona estiva: vi ringraziamo e vi diamo appuramento per stasera, alla solita ora: 20.40, su la7, dopo il Tg. #inonda #ranucci @mariannaaprile

    2451565527K viewsView on X
  • Sep 3, 20261.9x their median

    Ci ha lasciato Fabio Mussi. Un anno e mezzo fa, pubblicando “Opposizione” mi resi conto che questo bellissimo capitolo autobiografico di Fabio Mussi era il racconto di una generazione e (anche) un testamento politico. Lui mi chiamò divertito dicendo con la sua tipica ironia: “Mi chiamano alcuni compagni che hanno letto dicendomi: “Fabio, stai per morire?” E tu che rispondi? “Non ancora, grazie”. Adesso capisco che “Mi dimetto dal genere umano” non era il suo manifesto di allora. È il nostro di oggi. https://t.co/vZWos5qPPp

    22335817.0K viewsView on X
  • Sep 3, 2026

    Anche ieri #inonda al 7.%, primo programma di informazione della fascia. Ci vediamo stasera, come sempre, alle 20.40 e dintorni #la7 @mariannaaprile

    9915716.2K viewsView on X
  • Sep 2, 2026

    Anche ieri #inonda al 7.3% di share. Grazie a tutti, ci vediamo stasera! #la7 @mariannaaprile

    9423107.0K viewsView on X
  • Aug 29, 2026

    https://t.co/bjOCN5QQPk #report #ranucci #rai https://t.co/bxopz5DMc7

    3882315.5K viewsView on X
  • Aug 31, 2026

    Corrisponde al vero la notizia pubblicata sul sito del sindacato unitario dei giornalisti italiani @FnsiSocial che @giuliainnocenzi partecipò come relatrice ad un evento a @Montecitorio valido per l'ottenimento di 4 CFP? Corrisponde al vero che nel maggio 2016 era giornalista? https://t.co/fB4kCHMPx9

    459216.7K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#inonda#ranucci#report#la7#telese

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 142 interactions against 331K followers, an engagement rate of 0.043%. Measured over 14 original posts, its engagement rate beats 49% of 6,874 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 12K times each, and 1.18% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.64% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.7 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 23% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 08:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 14 posts sampled, 29% carry an image or video, 7% are part of a thread and 29% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 851 interactions, about 6.0x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #inonda, #ranucci, #report.

What is Luca Telese's engagement rate on X?
Luca Telese (@lucatelese) has an engagement rate of 0.043%, based on the median interactions across 14 original posts from the last 30 days against 330,514 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.043%, Luca Telese sits above the 25th percentile of the 66,536 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @lucatelese have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 49% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (6,874 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @lucatelese post?
Most posts go out around 08:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.73 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going