Back to @lucasleonxxx's profile

Lucas Leon engagement report

@lucasleonxxx - 290K followers on X

Measured over 10 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 20, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.2%
of 290K followers
Per impression
2.87%
20K views on a typical post
Reach
6.97%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
575
interactions (median)
Saved
0.332%
66 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.67/day
active 43% of days
Peak time
17:00 UTC
Monday

A typical post picks up 575 interactions against 290K followers, an engagement rate of 0.2%. Measured over 10 original posts, its engagement rate beats 74% of 15,519 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 20K times each, and 2.87% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 6.92% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.67 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 43% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 10 posts sampled, 90% carry an image or video, 10% are part of a thread and 20% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 20K interactions, about 57x its own typical post.

Measured over 10 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 20, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Lucas Leon's engagement rate beats 74% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (15,519 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 75% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.2%, Lucas Leon sits above the 50th percentile of the 157,515 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.128% to 0.604%.

p100.003%
p250.022%
p50 (median)0.128%
p750.604%
p902.32%
p9983.3%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 157,515 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 26,033 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.003%
25th percentile0.022%
50th percentile0.128%
75th percentile0.604%
90th percentile2.32%
99th percentile83.3%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 17:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 17:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 17:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Monday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Monday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video90% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link20% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--8%-9% to -7%41K
  • 90% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 20% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 77 characters, which falls in the under 80 characters band. Across the catalog, posts under 80 characters run 8% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Jun 17, 202657x their median

    https://t.co/u4p3ZhYfIo

    20K8545413240K viewsView on X
  • Jun 7, 202635x their median

    WE ARE GETTING SHIRTLESS DOOM GUY https://t.co/JpvmWi78ME

    11K8081222631.7M viewsView on X
  • Jun 10, 202634x their median

    🚨 DOCTOR SAYS THIS IS THE WORST VACCINE INJURY HE'S EVER SEEN — THE VIDEO IS HARD TO WATCH A doctor is going viral after sharing footage of a patient he says suffered the worst vaccine injury he's encountered in his entire career. The 52-year-old man says he received a COVID vaccine in 2021 and a booster shot in 2022. He claims that two months later, severe muscle spasms began. According to the patient, the condition became so debilitating that he was unable to properly sit, stand, or walk for the next four years. In the video, the doctor documents the man's condition and later shows what he says is significant improvement after several weeks of stem cell treatment. The footage is now spreading across social media and reigniting one of the most controversial debates of the last decade. Supporters say stories like this deserve far more attention. Critics argue there is no proof the vaccine caused his condition. But after watching the video, many people are asking the same question: What do you think we'll learn about the vaccine 10 years from now? 📹: Instagram/drmarkghalili

    6.7K1.9K2.4K1.2K8.6M viewsView on X
  • Jul 8, 202612x their median

    It’s insane how hot they made doomguy. https://t.co/D65SVE7Si0

    6.7K4283649182K viewsView on X
  • Aug 15, 20269.5x their median

    Physics is my favorite subject in school https://t.co/pRrdFq5DuC

    4.9K50720273K viewsView on X
  • Sep 11, 20257.4x their median

    Bifröst: Prelude to the Storm - Steam page is NOW LIVE! Please wishlist it and spread the word. Every wishlist helps us bring this game to life. Thank you so much for your support! 🔗Link in bio and comments below https://t.co/vEHLVM864Y

    3.8K4051624636K viewsView on X
  • Sep 15, 20267.3x their median

    This game is so fucking fire https://t.co/2P50NL7rm7

    3.9K235631493K viewsView on X
  • Jun 7, 20269.2x their median

    U.S. fertility rate now hits all-time low of 1.57 children per woman in 2025. https://t.co/3R7TjcVi1q

    2.4K239393227380K viewsView on X
  • Jul 30, 20263.8x their median

    What do you like most about this video? The big muscles, the pounding or the top rebrand :P? https://t.co/LloIaMWtXP

    1.9K18339068K viewsView on X
  • Sep 14, 20263.0x their median

    Milk me like @FlorienOF didn😈🍼🥵 https://t.co/dy4qb8nqJi

    1.6K1476129K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 575 interactions against 290K followers, an engagement rate of 0.2%. Measured over 10 original posts, its engagement rate beats 74% of 15,519 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 20K times each, and 2.87% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 6.92% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.67 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 43% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 10 posts sampled, 90% carry an image or video, 10% are part of a thread and 20% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 20K interactions, about 57x its own typical post.

What is Lucas Leon's engagement rate on X?
Lucas Leon (@lucasleonxxx) has an engagement rate of 0.2%, based on the median interactions across 10 original posts from the last 30 days against 289,745 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.2%, Lucas Leon sits above the 50th percentile of the 157,515 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @lucasleonxxx have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 74% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (15,519 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @lucasleonxxx post?
Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.67 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going