Lucas Leon engagement report
@lucasleonxxx - 290K followers on X
Measured over 10 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 20, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 575 interactions against 290K followers, an engagement rate of 0.2%. Measured over 10 original posts, its engagement rate beats 74% of 15,519 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 20K times each, and 2.87% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 6.92% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.67 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 43% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 10 posts sampled, 90% carry an image or video, 10% are part of a thread and 20% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 20K interactions, about 57x its own typical post.
Measured over 10 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 20, 2026.
Compared with accounts its own size
Lucas Leon's engagement rate beats 74% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (15,519 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 75% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.2%, Lucas Leon sits above the 50th percentile of the 157,515 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.128% to 0.604%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.003% |
| 25th percentile | 0.022% |
| 50th percentile | 0.128% |
| 75th percentile | 0.604% |
| 90th percentile | 2.32% |
| 99th percentile | 83.3% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 17:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 90% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 20% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | -8% | -9% to -7% | 41K |
- 90% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 20% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
- Its average post runs 77 characters, which falls in the under 80 characters band. Across the catalog, posts under 80 characters run 8% below the same accounts' other posts.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Jun 17, 202657x their median
https://t.co/u4p3ZhYfIo
- Jun 7, 202635x their median
WE ARE GETTING SHIRTLESS DOOM GUY https://t.co/JpvmWi78ME
- Jun 10, 202634x their median
🚨 DOCTOR SAYS THIS IS THE WORST VACCINE INJURY HE'S EVER SEEN — THE VIDEO IS HARD TO WATCH A doctor is going viral after sharing footage of a patient he says suffered the worst vaccine injury he's encountered in his entire career. The 52-year-old man says he received a COVID vaccine in 2021 and a booster shot in 2022. He claims that two months later, severe muscle spasms began. According to the patient, the condition became so debilitating that he was unable to properly sit, stand, or walk for the next four years. In the video, the doctor documents the man's condition and later shows what he says is significant improvement after several weeks of stem cell treatment. The footage is now spreading across social media and reigniting one of the most controversial debates of the last decade. Supporters say stories like this deserve far more attention. Critics argue there is no proof the vaccine caused his condition. But after watching the video, many people are asking the same question: What do you think we'll learn about the vaccine 10 years from now? 📹: Instagram/drmarkghalili
- Jul 8, 202612x their median
It’s insane how hot they made doomguy. https://t.co/D65SVE7Si0
- Aug 15, 20269.5x their median
Physics is my favorite subject in school https://t.co/pRrdFq5DuC
- Sep 11, 20257.4x their median
Bifröst: Prelude to the Storm - Steam page is NOW LIVE! Please wishlist it and spread the word. Every wishlist helps us bring this game to life. Thank you so much for your support! 🔗Link in bio and comments below https://t.co/vEHLVM864Y
- Sep 15, 20267.3x their median
This game is so fucking fire https://t.co/2P50NL7rm7
- Jun 7, 20269.2x their median
U.S. fertility rate now hits all-time low of 1.57 children per woman in 2025. https://t.co/3R7TjcVi1q
- Jul 30, 20263.8x their median
What do you like most about this video? The big muscles, the pounding or the top rebrand :P? https://t.co/LloIaMWtXP
- Sep 14, 20263.0x their median
Milk me like @FlorienOF didn😈🍼🥵 https://t.co/dy4qb8nqJi
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 575 interactions against 290K followers, an engagement rate of 0.2%. Measured over 10 original posts, its engagement rate beats 74% of 15,519 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 20K times each, and 2.87% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 6.92% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.67 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 43% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 10 posts sampled, 90% carry an image or video, 10% are part of a thread and 20% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 20K interactions, about 57x its own typical post.
- What is Lucas Leon's engagement rate on X?
- Lucas Leon (@lucasleonxxx) has an engagement rate of 0.2%, based on the median interactions across 10 original posts from the last 30 days against 289,745 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.2%, Lucas Leon sits above the 50th percentile of the 157,515 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @lucasleonxxx have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 74% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (15,519 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @lucasleonxxx post?
- Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.67 posts per day across the measured window.