Back to @ltshijie's profile

LT 視界 engagement report

@ltshijie - 380K followers on X

Measured over 84 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 1, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.032%
of 380K followers
Per impression
0.726%
17K views on a typical post
Reach
4.46%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
123
interactions (median)
Saved
0.035%
6 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
3.07/day
active 57% of days
Peak time
19:00 UTC
Thursday

A typical post picks up 123 interactions against 380K followers, an engagement rate of 0.032%. Measured over 84 original posts, its engagement rate beats 52% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 17K times each, and 0.726% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 4.46% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.1 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 57% of days. Most posts go out around 19:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 84 posts sampled, 73% carry an image or video and 13% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 1.2K interactions, about 9.5x its own typical post.

Measured over 84 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 1, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

LT 視界's engagement rate beats 52% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 39% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.032%, LT 視界 sits above the 25th percentile of the 204,880 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.143%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 204,880 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,891 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 19:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 19:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 19:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Thursday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Thursday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video73% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link13% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 73% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 13% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 96 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Aug 5, 20269.5x their median

    JUST IN: Squad socialist Rashida Tlaib clinches the Democratic primary in Michigan's 12th Congressional District and is headed to the general election in November. The far-left congresswoman and proud Democratic Socialists of America member, secures her party's nomination as she seeks another term representing the Detroit-area district.

    49013649247216K viewsView on X
  • Sep 30, 20267.1x their median

    今天挫敗劫機的頭號英雄是印度籍、FZ1073航班上的機長斯米特·馬查爾(Smit Machchhar)。儘管身受重傷,這位機長仍英勇地在倒下前設法打開了駕駛艙門。 他的機智果敢挽救了170多人的生命,並使乘客得以在恐怖分子企圖讓飛機墜毀時將其製服。 https://t.co/HFI3AmKd8Y

    8005651228K viewsView on X
  • Aug 4, 20265.9x their median

    對新的出入境規定,有媒體評論很到位:以前出入境查證件,今後出入境查動機。這是最可怕的地方。

    58632110368K viewsView on X
  • Sep 25, 20265.3x their median

    習近平極其高調的保鏢頭目。根本不像訓練有素的護衛,活脫街頭小流氓的作派。 https://t.co/ow2stgYrJI

    5845075351K viewsView on X
  • Aug 5, 20264.8x their median

    Breaking news: Hassabis told staff he was stepping back to focus on the 'big picture' in a major shake-up at the top of the AI lab that he founded. https://t.co/CPLMnbpKdf https://t.co/4VLVQV0rbk

    498581716138K viewsView on X
  • Sep 6, 20264.6x their median

    袁騰飛潤美成功,得到很多祝福。但是,這些祝福也給袁騰飛帶來焦慮。近日袁騰飛把台灣著名反共網紅、遭中共國台辦點名的台獨份子八囧擰出來示眾,聲明與反賊劃清界線;隨後,法輪功大V文昭也回應了袁騰飛謾罵。中共著名喉舌胡錫進也評論了袁潤美,稱其“剛脫離虎口,又落入狼窩”。因被指責把“祖國”比做“虎口”,胡錫進嚇得刪帖。海內外輿論都在關注袁騰飛潤美之後是否會“亮劍”。其實,中國人很容易理解袁騰飛為何焦慮,大家心照不宣。但是相比較,年輕的中國脫口秀明星池子應對這種輿論關切時表達的更智慧,他說“做反賊易,做脫口秀演員難”。池子這句話回既應了各方關切,也讓各方平靜下來。

    41020130695K viewsView on X
  • Sep 6, 20264.3x their median

    今天尼泊爾救援隊救出了被圍困隧道十天的中國國籍工人崔海濤,登上各大國際媒體頭條。崔海濤是被困隧道900多名工人中極少數倖存者。但是,這個新聞卻上不了中國社交媒體頭條。 https://t.co/0zr7Lcj40K

    3964986420K viewsView on X
  • Sep 7, 20264.3x their median

    今天《經濟學人》替郭德綱打抱不平,會給郭德綱帶來袁騰飛式的焦慮。做中國人不易。 https://t.co/8a3T8EbhfI

    486349579K viewsView on X
  • Aug 29, 20264.0x their median

    習近平長期貼身秘書鍾紹軍官宣被抓,不知道習近平本人如何解釋?但是從公開媒體鍾紹軍照片來看,當秘書時,一副奴才相;當將軍後,一副霸王相。顯然,深得習近平耳濡目染。 https://t.co/MsImIDmhG3

    4553742381K viewsView on X
  • Sep 2, 20263.7x their median

    袁騰飛移民是個好消息。一直以來人們討論哪些人適合移民,首先應該考慮移民的是那些有思想又「管不住自己的嘴」的人。相比較,崔永元等人,就非常痛苦。

    431129127K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 123 interactions against 380K followers, an engagement rate of 0.032%. Measured over 84 original posts, its engagement rate beats 52% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 17K times each, and 0.726% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 4.46% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.1 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 57% of days. Most posts go out around 19:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 84 posts sampled, 73% carry an image or video and 13% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 1.2K interactions, about 9.5x its own typical post.

What is LT 視界's engagement rate on X?
LT 視界 (@ltshijie) has an engagement rate of 0.032%, based on the median interactions across 84 original posts from the last 30 days against 379,954 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.032%, LT 視界 sits above the 25th percentile of the 204,880 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @ltshijie have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 52% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @ltshijie post?
Most posts go out around 19:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day, at roughly 3.07 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going