Back to @lovetocook12345's profile

Santa Trump.. ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ engagement report

@lovetocook12345 - 388K followers on X

Measured over 67 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 2, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.09%
of 388K followers
Per impression
2.34%
15K views on a typical post
Reach
3.83%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
347
interactions (median)
Saved
0.27%
40 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
3.6/day
active 40% of days
Peak time
17:00 UTC
Friday

A typical post picks up 347 interactions against 388K followers, an engagement rate of 0.09%. Measured over 67 original posts, its engagement rate beats 69% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 15K times each, and 2.34% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.81% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.6 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 40% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 67 posts sampled, 97% carry an image or video and 9% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 26K interactions, about 76x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #economy, #politics, #usa.

Measured over 67 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 2, 2026. Recurring tags: #economy, #politics, #usa.

Compared with accounts its own size

Santa Trump.. ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ's engagement rate beats 69% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 71% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.09%, Santa Trump.. ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,152 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.143%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,152 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,894 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 17:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 17:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 17:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Friday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Friday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video97% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link9% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 97% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 9% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 185 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 30, 202676x their median

    Anyone else getting REALLY sick of nonstop hearings and not seeing ONE SINGLE ARREST?!? https://t.co/hVL7mWsHEt

    18K5.5K2.1K455217K viewsView on X
  • Sep 29, 202657x their median

    Should he?๐Ÿ‘‡ https://t.co/9OLqztRYdM

    14K1.0K4.3K228143K viewsView on X
  • Sep 24, 202649x their median

    The world is one big stage... https://t.co/Q0qkorq0yL

    15K1.5K66950416K viewsView on X
  • Sep 11, 202636x their median

    Trump views tariffs not as a tax, but as a successful corporation giving back to its shareholdersโ€”the American people. This isn't just an election ploy; it's about rewarding the working and middle classes for their role in the nation's revival. #Politics #Economy #USA https://t.co/kk0B3dQE59

    8.8K3.3K304118151K viewsView on X
  • Sep 27, 202623x their median

    Trump JUST Revealed a MASSIVE Military Secret that LOWERED Gas Prices OP: Glen Beck https://t.co/cfXhD3U7xr https://t.co/cACIsMZMOd

    6.4K1.4K24244158K viewsView on X
  • Aug 31, 202619x their median

    Typical lefty, balls and mouth bigger than his mind.. they never think things through.. https://t.co/uaZii33ks8

    5.8K70746277K viewsView on X
  • Sep 30, 202619x their median

    ๐Ÿšจ The SSN linked to Barack Obama (042-68-4425) was originally issued in 1977 to a French immigrant named Jean Paul Ludwig who lived in Connecticut. Obama never lived there. Ludwig later died in Hawaii, where Obamaโ€™s grandmother worked in the probate office with access to deceased peopleโ€™s records. The claim: the number was never properly retired and was quietly used by Obama. Using someone elseโ€™s SSN is fraud. Stay tuned. W.H.G

    4.2K2.0K23476135K viewsView on X
  • Sep 29, 202618x their median

    I donโ€™t know if Iโ€™ve ever seen someone be kicked out of the White House before, let alone a world โ€˜leaderโ€™. Zelensky just got spanked and humiliated in front of the entire world. Trump and the American People have had enough. https://t.co/DWlmZwX2LQ

    4.8K1.1K21462186K viewsView on X
  • Aug 31, 202614x their median

    lol.. heads popping on 92% of all libtards. https://t.co/L9PfeUDIUb

    4.2K74002357K viewsView on X
  • Sep 11, 202612x their median

    We have been brainwashed to believe their narrative.. https://t.co/95Oqk0er9u

    3.4K87826076K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#economy#politics#usa

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 347 interactions against 388K followers, an engagement rate of 0.09%. Measured over 67 original posts, its engagement rate beats 69% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 15K times each, and 2.34% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.81% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.6 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 40% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 67 posts sampled, 97% carry an image or video and 9% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 26K interactions, about 76x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #economy, #politics, #usa.

What is Santa Trump.. ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ's engagement rate on X?
Santa Trump.. ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ (@lovetocook12345) has an engagement rate of 0.09%, based on the median interactions across 67 original posts from the last 30 days against 388,187 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.09%, Santa Trump.. ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,152 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @lovetocook12345 have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 69% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @lovetocook12345 post?
Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day, at roughly 3.6 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going