Back to @lourdesanchezok's profile

Lau engagement report

@lourdesanchezok - 1.2M followers on X

Measured over 9 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 25, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.029%
of 1.2M followers
Per impression
0.342%
106K views on a typical post
Reach
8.56%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
363
interactions (median)
Saved
0%
0 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.3/day
active 23% of days
Peak time
00:00 UTC
Friday

A typical post picks up 363 interactions against 1.2M followers, an engagement rate of 0.029%. Measured over 9 original posts, its engagement rate beats 50% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 106K times each, and 0.342% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 8.56% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.3 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 23% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 00:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 9 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video and 89% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 1.8K interactions, about 5.0x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #ad, #solana.

Measured over 9 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 25, 2026. Recurring tags: #ad, #solana.

Compared with accounts its own size

Lau's engagement rate beats 50% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 23% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.029%, Lau sits above the 25th percentile of the 204,880 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.143%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 204,880 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,891 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 00:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 00:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 00:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Friday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Friday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video100% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link89% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 100% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 89% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 526 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 22, 20265.0x their median

    BREAKING: Spot Bitcoin ETFs attracted +$999 million in inflows on Monday, their largest daily intake since October 2025. This was also the 9th largest daily inflow since Bitcoin ETFs began trading in January 2024 and follows the +$433 million recorded on Friday. Demand was led by the largest Bitcoin ETF, $IBIT, which attracted +$381 million, its 3rd-largest daily inflow since January. Over the last 3 trading days, $IBIT has posted a combined +$665 million in inflows. So far in September, Bitcoin ETFs have attracted +$1.3 billion, after the +$3.5 billion recorded in August. Appetite for crypto is surging.

    1.5K16312137213K viewsView on X
  • Jun 2, 20262.5x their median

    World Cup is coming πŸ”₯⚽️ Ollie Bearman just dropped his knockout bracket. πŸ‘€ Watch till the end and tell us if he actually cooked πŸ˜‚ #ZoomexWeeklyCall 🎁 100 USDT GIVEAWAY: 20 lucky winners Γ— 5 USDT each 1. Follow us + Like + Repost 2. Comment your World Cup winner prediction + your UID ⏰ Ends: 10:00 AM, Jun 5 (UTC) 🎟️Want to be at the World Cup Final? Check the pin post! #Zoomex2026WorldCup #HaasF1 #TheChampionsPlaybook

    36622128610175K viewsView on X
  • Jun 4, 20262.3x their median

    next billion dollar memecoin? πŸ€”

    282103981026K viewsView on X
  • Jun 13, 20261.9x their median

    Next BIG Crypto project is ___? πŸ€”

    24317409534K viewsView on X
  • Jun 8, 20262.0x their median

    GM β˜€οΈ Wishing everyone a productive week ahead. https://t.co/0pVXWjikqC

    31611332032K viewsView on X
  • Oct 9, 20261.8x their median

    Every good memecoin eventually needs lore. @GameOfCatogob skipped straight to an entire kingdom! 🐱 Nine lives πŸ‰ Dragons βš”οΈ Rival kingdoms πŸ‘‘ One throne I like meme projects that actually give the community something to play with beyond a ticker. If the timeline starts choosing houses next, I’m blaming $GAMEOFCAT. Which kingdom are you joining? πŸ‘€ πŸ”— https://t.co/FQ81bvcNZ3 CA: 6KBDqTzgRPpa6xWeS5nPCxPwZHCRu1C51mV3S9r3pump

    58616470124K viewsView on X
  • Jun 15, 20261.6x their median

    Good morning! Happy week! Let it count!β˜€οΈπŸ’ͺ https://t.co/17e0ttec8d

    2951129107.0K viewsView on X
  • Jun 16, 20261.5x their median

    GM to the ones who say GM β˜• https://t.co/iut9t0FUTo

    2851028407.5K viewsView on X
  • Jun 25, 20261.5x their median

    CAN I GET A GM? https://t.co/sgl0kH3TYQ

    288826019.2K viewsView on X
  • Jun 17, 20261.5x their median

    Good morning!β˜€οΈ Midweek already? Let’s go. https://t.co/GhfsiOjwyV

    2941424908.8K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#ad#solana

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 363 interactions against 1.2M followers, an engagement rate of 0.029%. Measured over 9 original posts, its engagement rate beats 50% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 106K times each, and 0.342% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 8.56% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.3 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 23% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 00:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 9 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video and 89% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 1.8K interactions, about 5.0x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #ad, #solana.

What is Lau's engagement rate on X?
Lau (@lourdesanchezok) has an engagement rate of 0.029%, based on the median interactions across 9 original posts from the last 30 days against 1,239,307 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.029%, Lau sits above the 25th percentile of the 204,880 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @lourdesanchezok have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 50% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @lourdesanchezok post?
Most posts go out around 00:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.3 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going