Back to @lorenzocordovav's profile

Lorenzo Córdova V. engagement report

@lorenzocordovav - 486K followers on X

Measured over 4 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 22, 2026.

Engagement

Per follower
0.149%
of 486K followers
Per impression
6.85%
11K views on a typical post
Reach
2.18%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
724
interactions (median)
Saved
0.047%
5 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.4/day
active 23% of days
Peak time
18:00 UTC
Tuesday

Early reading. We have captured 4 original posts for this account, below the 8 we require before treating a median as settled. The numbers above describe what we have seen so far, not a finished profile of the account.

A typical post picks up 724 interactions against 486K followers, an engagement rate of 0.149%. Posts are seen about 11K times each, and 6.85% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.18% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.4 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 23% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 18:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 4 posts sampled, 25% carry an image or video and 75% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 15K interactions, about 20x its own typical post. Only 4 original posts have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

Measured over 4 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 22, 2026.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.149%, Lorenzo Córdova V. sits above the 50th percentile of the 202,816 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.142% to 0.674%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.142%
p750.674%
p902.54%
p9982.5%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 202,816 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,929 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.142%
75th percentile0.674%
90th percentile2.54%
99th percentile82.5%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 18:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 18:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 18:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Tuesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Tuesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video25% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link75% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 25% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 75% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 241 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Aug 6, 202620x their median

    ¿Y si nos censuran, qué? En mi columna de hoy advierto sobre un riesgo que no comienza con una prohibición abierta, sino con algo más silencioso: periodistas y medios que terminan autocensurándose, alejándose de su audiencia y trabajando para una clase política que pretende controlar la conversación pública. La mejor defensa frente a la censura no es únicamente una ley o un amparo, sino una sociedad que valore, necesite y defienda al periodismo.

    9.8K4.4K44999195K viewsView on X
  • Aug 14, 202611x their median

    Llevo años apareciendo en sus listas (porque llevan años haciéndolas). ¿Qué sigue? Simple: 1) Seguir evidenciando sin descanso su naturaleza autoritaria, y 2) Continuar señalando, criticando y combatiendo los abusos del poder, sin dejar de pasarles ni uno solo. https://t.co/o4ZpRn7uJN

    5.5K2.0K1623254K viewsView on X
  • Sep 2, 20265.7x their median

    Como ha ocurrido el día de hoy con otros críticos del autoritarismo y “casualmente” unos días después de que @LuisaAlcalde publicó su “no-lista” con nuestros nombre y nuestros enlaces de X, también a mí intentaron hackearme mi cuenta sin éxito. 🙄 https://t.co/AnoetRcvVL

    2.9K1.1K411230K viewsView on X
  • Aug 11, 20264.4x their median

    Al decir que a ciertos medios (críticos) no se les contrata publicidad gubernamental, Sheinbaum no sólo evidencia el uso arbitrario y patrimonialista de los recursos públicos, sino que evidencia su vocación autoritaria y su lógica de “garrote y zanahoria”. https://t.co/vfon4CC5S1

    2.1K967911532K viewsView on X
  • Sep 5, 20262.7x their median

    Poder ser votado teniendo una doble nacionalidad si se ha renunciado a la protección del Estado extranjero es hoy un derecho adquirido por los mexicanos por nacimiento. Pretender prohibirlo es ir contra el principio fundamental de los DH de progresividad y no regresividad.

    1.3K60011712K viewsView on X
  • Aug 19, 20262.1x their median

    La lista De @LuisaAlcalde tiene un doble propósito: utilizar el poder para señalar y estigmatizar a sus críticos y alimentar su falaz narrativa autocrática de la lucha entre el bien (que ellos encarnan) y el mal. Autoritarismo puro y duro, ni más ni menos. https://t.co/E5nfNfNOHx

    1.0K46327324K viewsView on X
  • Aug 5, 20261.8x their median

    Lorenzo y Marco Baños eran los que “partían el queso” en el anterior IFE/INE. Representaban al PAN y al PRI. Por fin se quitaron la máscara y ahora son militantes de Somos MX (que es lo mismo). Acabaron como esbirros de Claudio X y Acosta Naranjo. https://t.co/dIiXDrQ4Xj

    52133346322134K viewsView on X
  • Sep 10, 20261.8x their median

    Por 2a. ocasión consecutiva (ya pasó en 2024),el @INEMexico arranca el proceso electoral federal sin una Secretaría Ejecutiva (el cargo operativo más relevante) nombrada por el Consejo General (como manda la Constitución),sino con un encargado de despacho. https://t.co/DaYamfjq0P

    83242621421K viewsView on X
  • Sep 25, 20261.8x their median

    A partir de hoy vuelvo a compartir contenidos en mis otras redes sociales. Sígueme en Facebook (https://t.co/h815bC0FXC) y en Instagram (https://t.co/V1GCFDEt4t).

    1.0K24415018K viewsView on X
  • Jun 23, 2026

    En su lógica abusiva y autoritaria, Morena buscó que el @TEPJF_informa le validara más de 110 mil militantes que no habían realizado con la App del INE y de los que no tenían soporte documental, poniendo en riesgo el registro de nuevos partidos. ¡Por suerte se les cayó la trampa! https://t.co/RzVKBur2sB

    70639412315K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 724 interactions against 486K followers, an engagement rate of 0.149%. Posts are seen about 11K times each, and 6.85% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.18% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.4 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 23% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 18:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 4 posts sampled, 25% carry an image or video and 75% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 15K interactions, about 20x its own typical post. Only 4 original posts have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

What is Lorenzo Córdova V.'s engagement rate on X?
Lorenzo Córdova V. (@lorenzocordovav) has an engagement rate of 0.149%, based on the median interactions across 4 original posts from the last 30 days against 485,923 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.149%, Lorenzo Córdova V. sits above the 50th percentile of the 202,816 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @lorenzocordovav have real engagement?
There is not yet enough sample to rank this account against others of its size.
When does @lorenzocordovav post?
Most posts go out around 18:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.4 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going