Back to @loreleifinds's profile

Lorelei Finds engagement report

@loreleifinds - 296K followers on X

Measured over 27 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 6, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.116%
of 296K followers
Per impression
1.21%
28K views on a typical post
Reach
9.61%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
344
interactions (median)
Saved
0.127%
36 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.93/day
active 80% of days
Peak time
12:00 UTC
Friday

A typical post picks up 344 interactions against 296K followers, an engagement rate of 0.116%. Measured over 27 original posts, its engagement rate beats 64% of 6,874 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 28K times each, and 1.21% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 9.60% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.9 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 12:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 27 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 1.6K interactions, about 4.5x its own typical post.

Measured over 27 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 6, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Lorelei Finds's engagement rate beats 64% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (6,874 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 7 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 52% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.116%, Lorelei Finds sits above the 50th percentile of the 66,128 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.1% to 0.499%.

p100.002%
p250.016%
p50 (median)0.1%
p750.499%
p902.09%
p99119.9%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 66,128 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 57,111 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.016%
50th percentile0.1%
75th percentile0.499%
90th percentile2.09%
99th percentile119.9%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 12:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 12:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 12:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Friday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Friday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video100% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--8%-9% to -7%41K
  • 100% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 56 characters, which falls in the under 80 characters band. Across the catalog, posts under 80 characters run 8% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Aug 26, 20264.5x their median

    Everyone’s different https://t.co/0tx9mp7qfk

    1.5K1916072K viewsView on X
  • Aug 20, 20264.4x their median

    When the business day is done https://t.co/QfEYlwOTco

    1.5K22250152K viewsView on X
  • Sep 1, 20263.5x their median

    Scratch and sniff https://t.co/770NQ7gnZs

    1.2K20150101K viewsView on X
  • Sep 3, 20262.4x their median

    Would you be okay with this? https://t.co/zLGa7Of8Rx

    7691724062K viewsView on X
  • Aug 18, 20262.1x their median

    Long hard day at the office https://t.co/tdmHQNpNgc

    6851117034K viewsView on X
  • Sep 2, 20261.9x their median

    I don’t want to be in charge https://t.co/1Hun0g3d1h

    6081522019K viewsView on X
  • Aug 21, 20261.9x their median

    What can I say, I like it big! @its_beckylee https://t.co/L778mWZZdH

    622125044K viewsView on X
  • Aug 13, 20261.8x their median

    Glad you loved it! https://t.co/JtHsC8OxJK

    58989030K viewsView on X
  • Aug 14, 20261.7x their median

    Something enticing is beginning today. Check the comments and thank me later https://t.co/ARcOU3O7R9

    574108024K viewsView on X
  • Aug 24, 20261.7x their median

    Don’t be weird @its_beckylee https://t.co/bHiO3T7NJr

    554168029K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 344 interactions against 296K followers, an engagement rate of 0.116%. Measured over 27 original posts, its engagement rate beats 64% of 6,874 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 28K times each, and 1.21% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 9.60% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.9 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 12:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 27 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 1.6K interactions, about 4.5x its own typical post.

What is Lorelei Finds's engagement rate on X?
Lorelei Finds (@loreleifinds) has an engagement rate of 0.116%, based on the median interactions across 27 original posts from the last 30 days against 295,810 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.116%, Lorelei Finds sits above the 50th percentile of the 66,128 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @loreleifinds have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 64% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (6,874 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @loreleifinds post?
Most posts go out around 12:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.93 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going