Lord of Sugar ππͺ engagement report
@lordsugar01 - 512K followers on X
Measured over 65 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 18, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 27 interactions against 512K followers, an engagement rate of 0.005%. Measured over 65 original posts, its engagement rate beats 26% of 20,182 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 4.6K times each, and 0.586% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.901% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 5 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 13% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 65 posts sampled, 40% carry an image or video and 6% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 85K interactions, about 3156x its own typical post.
Measured over 65 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 18, 2026.
Compared with accounts its own size
Lord of Sugar ππͺ's engagement rate beats 26% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,182 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 34% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.005%, Lord of Sugar ππͺ sits above the 10th percentile of the 202,956 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.024%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.024% |
| 50th percentile | 0.142% |
| 75th percentile | 0.674% |
| 90th percentile | 2.54% |
| 99th percentile | 82.5% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 16:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 40% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 3% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | no effect | -2% to -1% | 42K |
- 40% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 3% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
- Its average post runs 217 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Aug 27, 20263156x their median
Our 2026/27 #UCL games are set πΏ https://t.co/KRUdN228KD
- Jun 5, 2026436x their median
She messed up with him and almost pay for the consequences! Being loyal and faithful donβt cost much or does it ? π€·π½ββοΈ https://t.co/mHwluYQNXc
- Aug 27, 2026227x their median
https://t.co/XiaRAtNijt
- Sep 5, 202682x their median
You've been misusing these English words all your life. 1. BOGUS It doesn't mean big. β It means fake or fraudulent. β 2. LOUSY It doesn't mean noisy. β It means terrible or low-quality. β 3. TOUT What you want to say is LOUT (a rude or violent person). β 4. PRACTICALIZE There's no such standard English word. β Say βpractiseβ or βput into practice.β β 5. INFAMOUS It doesn't mean not famous. β It means famous for something bad. β 6. DISINTERESTED It doesn't mean uninterested. β It means impartial or unbiased. β 7. IRREGARDLESS That's nonstandard. β What you intend to say is REGARDLESS. β I hope you learnt something. Stay informed. And Stay sharp! πͺ
- Sep 17, 202656x their median
One of my very successful aunty relocated to Canada. This woman had everything here. She called me yesterday to send some property documents to someone. Top position in civil service. Business doing well. Properties. Everything working in her favour. Thats when she told me she's in Canada now. I said, you moved permanently? She said yes.....that has got me thinking sha, this woman has everything here. So some people can be rich and okay and still decided to Japa.
- Aug 27, 202640x their median
At this point, her loyalty to her man remain 1%.π https://t.co/j6oMLyExp5
- Sep 5, 202631x their median
Why don't we ever celebrate Halloween in Nigeria?
- Aug 27, 202630x their median
Lord, let your ear be attentive to the prayer of Me , Nehemiah 1-11, Deliver my soul from death, my eyes from tears, and my feet from falling I rebuke and cast out all spirits of affliction, sorrow, and anything attempting to bring me low in Jesus name I pray π€² https://t.co/O57CKH3msN
- Sep 18, 202623x their median
Go to ChatGPT and type 'put me somewhere I belong' and attach your pictureβ¦ This is mine πΈππΈπΈπΈπΈπΈπ https://t.co/yxUhACtiwx
- Sep 17, 202622x their median
Iβve stopped comparing my progress to people online. Someone is buying a house while Iβm trying to pay rent. Someone is travelling while Iβm saving for my next move. Someone is getting married while Iβm still figuring out my life. Someone is making millions while Iβm celebrating a small gig. Weβre all seeing different chapters of each otherβs lives. Iβd rather focus on making my own chapter better.
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 27 interactions against 512K followers, an engagement rate of 0.005%. Measured over 65 original posts, its engagement rate beats 26% of 20,182 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 4.6K times each, and 0.586% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.901% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 5 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 13% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 65 posts sampled, 40% carry an image or video and 6% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 85K interactions, about 3156x its own typical post.
- What is Lord of Sugar ππͺ's engagement rate on X?
- Lord of Sugar ππͺ (@lordsugar01) has an engagement rate of 0.005%, based on the median interactions across 65 original posts from the last 30 days against 511,518 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.005%, Lord of Sugar ππͺ sits above the 10th percentile of the 202,956 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @lordsugar01 have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 26% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,182 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @lordsugar01 post?
- Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day, at roughly 4.97 posts per day across the measured window.