Back to @lopp's profile

Jameson Lopp engagement report

@lopp - 532K followers on X

Measured over 40 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 16, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.045%
of 532K followers
Per impression
1.39%
17K views on a typical post
Reach
3.24%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
240
interactions (median)
Saved
0.096%
16 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
2.03/day
active 77% of days
Peak time
16:00 UTC
Thursday

A typical post picks up 240 interactions against 532K followers, an engagement rate of 0.045%. Measured over 40 original posts, its engagement rate beats 58% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 17K times each, and 1.39% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.24% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 77% of days. Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 40 posts sampled, 28% carry an image or video, 5% are part of a thread and 15% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 99K interactions, about 412x its own typical post.

Measured over 40 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 16, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Jameson Lopp's engagement rate beats 58% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 57% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.045%, Jameson Lopp sits above the 25th percentile of the 204,956 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.143%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 204,956 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,894 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 16:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 16:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 16:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Thursday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Thursday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video28% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link15% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 28% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 15% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 218 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Jan 27, 2025412x their median

    open source everything

    82K11K4.1K1.8K9.2M viewsView on X
  • Sep 15, 20239.6x their median

    If you install Google Authenticator from the app store and follow the suggested instructions, your 2FA codes are by default saved to the cloud. I recommend not linking the Authenticator to your Google account, in which case you should see this "no cloud" icon in the upper right. https://t.co/fTB64aRHMr

    1.7K29217845828K viewsView on X
  • Sep 13, 20265.6x their median

    If there was a vulnerability in the Bitcoin protocol you can bet your ass it would have been exploited by now. A true testament to solid engineering.

    1.2K7668997K viewsView on X
  • Aug 9, 20265.6x their median

    I won't be "welcoming back" or unblocking any BIP-110 supporters. They proved themselves to be susceptible to delusional propaganda from folks emanating reality distortion fields. In many cases they spewed vitriol and harassed the very people who have devoted their lives to supporting and improving Bitcoin. I expect that Bitcoin Puritan culture will continue on its path to becoming even more unhinged, and its adherents have already wasted countless hours of our time. No more.

    1.1K831042057K viewsView on X
  • Aug 29, 20265.5x their median

    Dune: Part Three will be released on December 18... https://t.co/HyvCpnDW5O

    1.2K585710126K viewsView on X
  • Oct 15, 20265.3x their median

    A cryptocurrency owner was kidnapped in Toronto in July by a gang of 7 men that included 3 members of the Canadian military. https://t.co/tVrDWFgpNB

    1.0K1725734134K viewsView on X
  • Aug 27, 20264.9x their median

    JUST IN: 🇺🇸 Three South Carolina teenagers arrested after cutting down and smashing a Flock surveillance camera. https://t.co/PMuNMW9kaJ

    890531785076K viewsView on X
  • Sep 13, 20264.4x their median

    TSA agent took the bait today and asked me "what is freedom?" Taken aback by the vagueness of the question, I responded "that's complicated, but it's the opposite of what we're doing right now." https://t.co/cOHWFwaC6V

    9872841234K viewsView on X
  • Aug 25, 20263.6x their median

    "Don't get so busy making a living that you forget to make a life." - Dolly Parton Rest in Peace

    821469020K viewsView on X
  • Aug 12, 20263.6x their median

    An inevitable development: people who buy houses formerly owned by wealthy bitcoiners are in physical danger. One couple in France who have no crypto were wrench attacked 3 times in one month because their address is in data breaches. https://t.co/on7P87lmSA

    6861004537182K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 240 interactions against 532K followers, an engagement rate of 0.045%. Measured over 40 original posts, its engagement rate beats 58% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 17K times each, and 1.39% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.24% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 77% of days. Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 40 posts sampled, 28% carry an image or video, 5% are part of a thread and 15% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 99K interactions, about 412x its own typical post.

What is Jameson Lopp's engagement rate on X?
Jameson Lopp (@lopp) has an engagement rate of 0.045%, based on the median interactions across 40 original posts from the last 30 days against 531,511 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.045%, Jameson Lopp sits above the 25th percentile of the 204,956 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @lopp have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 58% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @lopp post?
Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.03 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going