Back to @lopinion_fr's profile

l'Opinion engagement report

@lopinion_fr - 180K followers on X

Measured over 75 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 18, 2026.

Engagement

Bottom 10% for its size
Per follower
0.001%
of 180K followers
Per impression
0.129%
778 views on a typical post
Reach
0.43%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
1
interactions (median)
Saved
0%
0 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
2.7/day
active 13% of days
Peak time
15:00 UTC
Friday

A typical post picks up 1 interaction against 180K followers, an engagement rate of 0.001%. Measured over 75 original posts, its engagement rate beats 4% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 778 times each, and 0.129% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.433% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.7 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 13% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 75 posts sampled, 99% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 339 interactions, about 339x its own typical post.

Measured over 75 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 18, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

l'Opinion's engagement rate beats 4% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 7% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.001%, l'Opinion sits below the 10th percentile of the 204,880 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.024%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 204,880 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,891 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 15:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 15:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 15:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Friday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Friday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video1% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link99% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 1% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 99% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 110 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Oct 15, 2026339x their median

    « Il incarne une forme de nouveauté » : qui sont les électeurs de David Lisnard ? https://t.co/Q5ta1NNeMl

    254612135.1K viewsView on X
  • Oct 15, 2026184x their median

    Journal d'une succession : le bâton de dynamique https://t.co/fXQSwznykz

    14135715.0K viewsView on X
  • Sep 18, 2026123x their median

    Jacques Attali : « François Hollande serait capable de piloter un avion de chasse dans la tempête » https://t.co/vky2MkrLSl

    2911552812K viewsView on X
  • Sep 17, 202695x their median

    « Le principal leader européen » : Gabriel Attal encense Emmanuel Macron et promet les « Etats-Unis d’Europe » https://t.co/ZUxDJUx9jE

    54211643.7K viewsView on X
  • Sep 17, 202695x their median

    « Quelque chose doit changer » : l’appel des maires en faveur de Dominique de Villepin pour 2027 https://t.co/GHcmM97WGF

    58251025.2K viewsView on X
  • Oct 15, 202651x their median

    Malmené dans les sondages, Edouard Philippe assume de ralentir le rythme des annonces https://t.co/CXyqKrNGMy

    23210168.8K viewsView on X
  • Sep 17, 202627x their median

    « Nous sommes plus forts ensemble » : l'intégralité du discours de Mark Carney face aux eurodéputés https://t.co/Y6LViOn8HP

    302401.1K viewsView on X
  • Sep 17, 202625x their median

    « Je n’ai organisé aucune fuite » : Laurent Nuñez se défend d’avoir contribué aux rumeurs sur la prétendue détention de drogue de Rima Hassan https://t.co/anhgjhYlZH

    831317.8K viewsView on X
  • Sep 18, 202614x their median

    « La France n’a pas choisi cette guerre » : face aux chefs de parti, Emmanuel Macron plaide non-coupable sur la crise des carburants https://t.co/o7ZLOQURIN

    62511.2K viewsView on X
  • Sep 17, 202613x their median

    Canadair français, étangs et adaptation : Edouard Philippe dévoile ses propositions pour le climat https://t.co/lH0zjqcqoq

    84101.9K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 1 interaction against 180K followers, an engagement rate of 0.001%. Measured over 75 original posts, its engagement rate beats 4% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 778 times each, and 0.129% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.433% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.7 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 13% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 75 posts sampled, 99% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 339 interactions, about 339x its own typical post.

What is l'Opinion's engagement rate on X?
l'Opinion (@lopinion_fr) has an engagement rate of 0.001%, based on the median interactions across 75 original posts from the last 30 days against 179,876 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.001%, l'Opinion sits below the 10th percentile of the 204,880 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @lopinion_fr have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 4% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the bottom 10% for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @lopinion_fr post?
Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.7 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going