Back to @lootproject's profile

Loot engagement report

@lootproject - 62K followers on X

Measured over 13 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 27, 2026.

Engagement

Bottom 10% for its size
Per follower
0.005%
of 62K followers
Per impression
0.248%
1.2K views on a typical post
Reach
1.95%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
3
interactions (median)
Saved
0%
0 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.6/day
active 20% of days
Peak time
09:00 UTC
Wednesday

A typical post picks up 3 interactions against 62K followers, an engagement rate of 0.005%. Measured over 13 original posts, its engagement rate beats 9% of 20,445 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 1.2K times each, and 0.248% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.95% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.6 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 20% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 09:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 13 posts sampled, 92% carry an image or video, 8% are part of a thread and 23% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 266 interactions, about 89x its own typical post.

Measured over 13 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 27, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Loot's engagement rate beats 9% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,445 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 5 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 11% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.005%, Loot sits above the 10th percentile of the 205,374 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.024%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,374 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,897 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 09:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 09:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 09:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Wednesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Wednesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video92% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link23% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 92% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 23% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 211 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Aug 26, 202689x their median

    We've added A.C.K.'s Argonauts and Loot (for Adventurers) to the Fake World Assets pool. https://t.co/YFHzrcDaxK

    2192420312K viewsView on X
  • Jul 22, 202643x their median

    Man its super cool to see what the Loot Survivor guys (on Starknet) cooked up for their collaboration with Gigaverse. This type of cross-chain interoperable flux-capacitor powered gaming event.. is as aligned with Vitalik's original Ethereum thesis as u can get. 🫡 https://t.co/sOFaphZ23t

    90171926.8K viewsView on X
  • Jul 20, 202639x their median

    Two games. One event. Over $5,000 in prizes. We've teamed up with @playgigaverse - starting tomorrow, our two worlds collide for 3 days. Here's everything on the line 🧵 https://t.co/MTxxs02JY9

    642519815K viewsView on X
  • Jul 27, 202616x their median

    It's live. The Loot (for Adventurers) is available now at https://t.co/dsVgm27Pgc for presale. Ours to share, and now yours to hold. Thou mayest read on!

    298565.3K viewsView on X
  • Jul 23, 20267.7x their median

    Beyond the print run in soft and hardcover, a few copies are being bound by hand. Special editions for the contributing authors and others are being commissioned from rebinding artists who work in leather and thread to bring Loot to life as the spellbinding book it deserves. https://t.co/AGbE8HDRDx

    212002.0K viewsView on X
  • Aug 3, 20267.0x their median

    Honorbound and Handbound, "Loot (for Adventurers)" in full glory, available for commission from Bespoke Bindery https://t.co/Ty6dCAnAI9 https://t.co/7AibA4gPSP

    144212.0K viewsView on X
  • Jul 22, 20266.3x their median

    Sit with how improbable this is. Five years ago, Loot was a list of words in a smart contract. No art and no lore attached, just items in a bag that anyone could read. Thousands of strangers looked at that blank space and started filling it with entire worlds. Five years on, a 578-page hardcover of those worlds is sitting on our desk. It goes up for presale Monday. That is the thing you'll be holding.

    163002.0K viewsView on X
  • Sep 5, 20265.7x their median

    Loot DAO Proposal 19 is live ⚔️ 80 Loot Bags + 21 ETH to activate Loot through FWA and fund the upcoming Bring Your Own Bag Dungeon. @provablegames @lootsurvivor @token_works Proposal link in the reply below 👇

    131302.3K viewsView on X
  • Jul 27, 20264.7x their median

    July 27th @ 10am EST The "Loot (for Adventurers)" book of stories and tales from the Realms releases today

    113002.1K viewsView on X
  • Jul 24, 20264.7x their median

    Some early readers share their feelings around the mystery of contributing authors. Who do YOU think wrote and contributed to "Loot (for Adventurers)"? Find out Monday when pre-sale goes live at 10:00 am EST https://t.co/9RpIuTgLtm

    113001.5K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 3 interactions against 62K followers, an engagement rate of 0.005%. Measured over 13 original posts, its engagement rate beats 9% of 20,445 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 1.2K times each, and 0.248% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.95% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.6 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 20% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 09:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 13 posts sampled, 92% carry an image or video, 8% are part of a thread and 23% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 266 interactions, about 89x its own typical post.

What is Loot's engagement rate on X?
Loot (@lootproject) has an engagement rate of 0.005%, based on the median interactions across 13 original posts from the last 30 days against 61,865 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.005%, Loot sits above the 10th percentile of the 205,374 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @lootproject have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 9% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,445 accounts), which puts it in the bottom 10% for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @lootproject post?
Most posts go out around 09:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.6 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going