Back to @liz_churchill10's profile

Liz Churchill engagement report

@liz_churchill10 - 899K followers on X

Measured over 88 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 29, 2026.

Engagement

Top 10% for its size
Per follower
0.575%
of 899K followers
Per impression
14.5%
36K views on a typical post
Reach
3.96%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
5.2K
interactions (median)
Saved
0.271%
96 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
3.63/day
active 67% of days
Peak time
18:00 UTC
Friday

A typical post picks up 5.2K interactions against 899K followers, an engagement rate of 0.575%. Measured over 88 original posts, its engagement rate beats 94% of 3,862 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 36K times each, and 14.5% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.96% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.6 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 67% of days. Most posts go out around 18:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 88 posts sampled, 97% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 88K interactions, about 17x its own typical post.

Measured over 88 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 29, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Liz Churchill's engagement rate beats 94% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,862 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 100% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.575%, Liz Churchill sits above the 75th percentile of the 37,459 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the top 25% band, which runs 0.438% to 2.10%.

p100.002%
p250.012%
p50 (median)0.081%
p750.438%
p902.10%
p99159.8%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 37,459 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 106,523 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.012%
50th percentile0.081%
75th percentile0.438%
90th percentile2.10%
99th percentile159.8%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 18:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 18:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 6%Busiest hour: 18:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%52K
01:00 UTC-2%53K
02:00 UTC-3%51K
03:00 UTC-4%55K
04:00 UTC-6%44K
05:00 UTC-4%43K
06:00 UTC-4%49K
07:00 UTC-5%53K
08:00 UTC-4%62K
09:00 UTC-3%71K
10:00 UTC-2%74K
11:00 UTC-3%81K
12:00 UTC-2%89K
13:00 UTC-2%97K
14:00 UTC-3%100K
15:00 UTC-2%104K
16:00 UTC-4%101K
17:00 UTC-3%94K
18:00 UTC-1%87K
19:00 UTC-2%82K
20:00 UTC-1%77K
21:00 UTC-1%68K
22:00 UTC-1%59K
23:00 UTC-2%53K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Friday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 5%Busiest day: Friday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%236K
Monday0%298K
Tuesday-3%295K
Wednesday-1%255K
Thursday-1%249K
Friday-3%257K
Saturday+3%231K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Best tweets

  • Aug 22, 202617x their median

    He had enough money to end poverty, world hunger and clean the oceans…but instead…he blocked out the sun, made GMO mosquitos and fake meat…and most notably, produced toxic ‘vaccines’ for the entire planet…so you really need to ask yourself why… https://t.co/UKeQVBwJpl

    59K24K3.8K1.2K540K viewsView on X
  • Aug 21, 20269.4x their median

    She took on the Deep State, exposed Fauci, stood unbreakable beside her husband through his rare cancer…and thanked God for her strength. Tulsi Gabbard is one of the strongest women alive…🙏🏻 https://t.co/V3S4FGG9yE

    42K5.0K1.2K169271K viewsView on X
  • Aug 10, 20269.3x their median

    If you poison someone and they die, you go to jail. But when Pfizer and Moderna poisoned people which caused miscarriages, myocarditis, blood clots and death…their ‘products’ were FDA approved, while governments made it mandatory…while they made billions? https://t.co/Vkj0Q1xjdP

    31K15K1.3K508491K viewsView on X
  • Aug 26, 20268.4x their median

    Hero Dr. Meryl Nass just WON in court after Maine’s Medical Board suspended her and ordered a ‘Psychiatric Evaluation’ for daring to prescribe ivermectin and defy the Covid Scam orthodoxy… THANK YOU for your bravery and for taking on the Medical Cartel 🙏🏻 https://t.co/CX1kFXlyDh

    33K9.7K660333271K viewsView on X
  • Aug 14, 20268.0x their median

    Left: An Evil Doctor that banned Bactrim for HIV patients to push AZT resulting in Mass Deaths Right: An Evil Doctor that banned Ivermectin for Covid patients to push Remdesivir resulting in Mass Deaths ARREST DR. FAUCI NOW https://t.co/5BHc4aohVP

    29K12K646288260K viewsView on X
  • Aug 20, 20267.7x their median

    The same people who believe the world is overpopulated…say they can save your life with a vaccine 🤡 https://t.co/oK6sJXD3Fx

    26K12K1.1K570232K viewsView on X
  • Aug 28, 20267.6x their median

    I still can’t believe this. Governor Josh Shapiro, LIED about people dying of measles, took millions in kickbacks from a Vaccine Cartel NGO weeks prior…and then did a press conference blaming RFK Jr. and the ‘unvaccinated’. Holy shit, this guy is pure fucking evil. https://t.co/9egi8wEShi

    27K10K1.6K394157K viewsView on X
  • Aug 11, 20267.1x their median

    THEY KNEW. We MUST have Public Trials for these Monsters… Pfizer’s own data: 1000%+ spikes in cancer, miscarriage and heart damage…as Fauci and Gates REPEATEDLY STATED it was ‘Safe and Effective’… https://t.co/7zZsydETJF

    23K13K723444280K viewsView on X
  • Aug 28, 20265.4x their median

    Kathy Hochul’s New York State is fining the Amish over $100,000 DOLLARS because of their tyrannical vaccine mandates. They’re legally abusing the only people in America who don’t bother anyone. Absolute Psychopath. https://t.co/GILISM7AR7

    19K7.2K1.6K460128K viewsView on X
  • Aug 14, 20265.0x their median

    Lockdowns…War Crimes Ventilators…War Crimes Remdesivir…War Crimes Forced Masking…War Crimes School Closures…War Crimes Silencing Doctors…War Crimes The Covid Vaccine…War Crimes Vaccine Passports…War Crimes Planned Pandemic…War Crimes MILLIONS DEAD…WAR CRIMES https://t.co/YmN9xB3eGJ

    18K6.8K747224125K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 5.2K interactions against 899K followers, an engagement rate of 0.575%. Measured over 88 original posts, its engagement rate beats 94% of 3,862 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 36K times each, and 14.5% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.96% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.6 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 67% of days. Most posts go out around 18:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 88 posts sampled, 97% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 88K interactions, about 17x its own typical post.

What is Liz Churchill's engagement rate on X?
Liz Churchill (@liz_churchill10) has an engagement rate of 0.575%, based on the median interactions across 88 original posts from the last 30 days against 899,116 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.575%, Liz Churchill sits above the 75th percentile of the 37,459 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @liz_churchill10 have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 94% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,862 accounts), which puts it in the top 10% for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @liz_churchill10 post?
Most posts go out around 18:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day, at roughly 3.63 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going