Back to @liz_churchill10's profile

Liz Churchill engagement report

@liz_churchill10 - 902K followers on X

Measured over 22 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 24, 2026.

Engagement

Top quarter for its size
Per follower
0.324%
of 902K followers
Per impression
11.6%
25K views on a typical post
Reach
2.80%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
2.9K
interactions (median)
Saved
0.25%
63 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.17/day
active 30% of days
Peak time
02:00 UTC
Saturday

A typical post picks up 2.9K interactions against 902K followers, an engagement rate of 0.324%. Measured over 22 original posts, its engagement rate beats 88% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 25K times each, and 11.6% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.80% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.2 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 30% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 02:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 22 posts sampled, 95% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 129K interactions, about 44x its own typical post.

Measured over 22 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 24, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Liz Churchill's engagement rate beats 88% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 99% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.324%, Liz Churchill sits above the 50th percentile of the 204,956 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.143% to 0.678%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 204,956 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,894 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 02:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 02:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 02:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Saturday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Saturday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video95% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 95% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 180 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 6, 202644x their median

    Angela Merkel ADMITTED on CAMERA that she deliberately flooded Germany with third-world migrants to “stop the far-right”… Today, the ‘Far-right’ won… https://t.co/EWLqejt1rH

    105K21K2.3K6661.7M viewsView on X
  • Aug 22, 202630x their median

    He had enough money to end poverty, world hunger and clean the oceans…but instead…he blocked out the sun, made GMO mosquitos and fake meat…and most notably, produced toxic ‘vaccines’ for the entire planet…so you really need to ask yourself why… https://t.co/UKeQVBwJpl

    59K24K3.8K1.2K540K viewsView on X
  • Sep 4, 202621x their median

    Maria Bartiromo is a Hero. She told President Trump that Fox News was burying the 2020 stolen-election story…and they fired her for it.​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​ That’s courage. Real reporters don’t take orders to stay silent. https://t.co/5159MjR1BE

    47K12K1.8K292374K viewsView on X
  • Aug 30, 202620x their median

    I still can’t believe the media did this… “You f’d up, CBSDFW…this is my kid you used in your story without my permission. He does not have the measles. This was his reaction to the MMR shot. Take it down. Now. Issue a retraction. It's much easier than having to litigate a defamation case. I'II wait”

    44K15K589339524K viewsView on X
  • Aug 28, 202619x their median

    I still can’t believe this. Governor Josh Shapiro, LIED about people dying of measles, took millions in kickbacks from a Vaccine Cartel NGO weeks prior…and then did a press conference blaming RFK Jr. and the ‘unvaccinated’. Holy shit, this guy is pure fucking evil. https://t.co/9egi8wEShi

    38K15K2.3K583311K viewsView on X
  • Oct 22, 202619x their median

    HEROES in the Netherlands 🏆 Lawyer Peter Strassen receives a monumental welcome as he takes on Pandemic Planners Bill Gates, Albert Bourla and Mark Rutte in the Netherlands Civil Court Case… https://t.co/mr5763Pvs6

    39K14K677515308K viewsView on X
  • Aug 21, 202617x their median

    She took on the Deep State, exposed Fauci, stood unbreakable beside her husband through his rare cancer…and thanked God for her strength. Tulsi Gabbard is one of the strongest women alive…🙏🏻 https://t.co/V3S4FGG9yE

    42K5.0K1.2K169271K viewsView on X
  • Aug 10, 202617x their median

    If you poison someone and they die, you go to jail. But when Pfizer and Moderna poisoned people which caused miscarriages, myocarditis, blood clots and death…their ‘products’ were FDA approved, while governments made it mandatory…while they made billions? https://t.co/Vkj0Q1xjdP

    31K15K1.3K508491K viewsView on X
  • Aug 26, 202615x their median

    Hero Dr. Meryl Nass just WON in court after Maine’s Medical Board suspended her and ordered a ‘Psychiatric Evaluation’ for daring to prescribe ivermectin and defy the Covid Scam orthodoxy… THANK YOU for your bravery and for taking on the Medical Cartel 🙏🏻 https://t.co/CX1kFXlyDh

    33K9.7K660333271K viewsView on X
  • Aug 14, 202614x their median

    Left: An Evil Doctor that banned Bactrim for HIV patients to push AZT resulting in Mass Deaths Right: An Evil Doctor that banned Ivermectin for Covid patients to push Remdesivir resulting in Mass Deaths ARREST DR. FAUCI NOW https://t.co/5BHc4aohVP

    29K12K646288260K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 2.9K interactions against 902K followers, an engagement rate of 0.324%. Measured over 22 original posts, its engagement rate beats 88% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 25K times each, and 11.6% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.80% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.2 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 30% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 02:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 22 posts sampled, 95% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 129K interactions, about 44x its own typical post.

What is Liz Churchill's engagement rate on X?
Liz Churchill (@liz_churchill10) has an engagement rate of 0.324%, based on the median interactions across 22 original posts from the last 30 days against 901,879 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.324%, Liz Churchill sits above the 50th percentile of the 204,956 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @liz_churchill10 have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 88% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the top quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @liz_churchill10 post?
Most posts go out around 02:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.17 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going