Back to @liyiping1911's profile

李一平 engagement report

@liyiping1911 - 97K followers on X

Measured over 17 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 14, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.255%
of 97K followers
Per impression
1.84%
13K views on a typical post
Reach
13.8%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
247
interactions (median)
Saved
0.06%
8 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
3.47/day
active 33% of days
Peak time
12:00 UTC
Saturday

A typical post picks up 247 interactions against 97K followers, an engagement rate of 0.255%. Measured over 17 original posts, its engagement rate beats 68% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 13K times each, and 1.84% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 13.8% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.5 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 33% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 12:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 17 posts sampled, 59% carry an image or video and 12% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 14K interactions, about 57x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #huseyincelil, #覃伟进, #高智晟.

Measured over 17 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 14, 2026. Recurring tags: #huseyincelil, #覃伟进, #高智晟.

Compared with accounts its own size

李一平's engagement rate beats 68% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 7 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 59% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.255%, 李一平 sits above the 50th percentile of the 204,956 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.143% to 0.678%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 204,956 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,894 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 12:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 12:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 12:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Saturday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Saturday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video59% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link12% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 59% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 12% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 239 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Aug 21, 202657x their median

    Before Trump launched his reckless, stupid WAR, the U.S. had 4 Naval Ports in the Middle East, valued at $4-$8 BILLION to build (each). We now have ZERO Ports, they have been DESTROYED. That's why there have been no shore leave for the navy. We also had 14 Military bases, now there are 2. Because Iran bombed them to pieces and absconded all assets. The financial losses alone are estimated to be around a Trillion dollars...and that's all within 6 months. That's what the Pentagon is hiding

    11K3.3K218111379K viewsView on X
  • Aug 22, 202644x their median

    صورة أثارت سخطا واسعا في أرجاء العالم . صورة الوزير بن غفير وهو يسخر من أحد الأسرى . و من بين أبرز ردود الأفعال تعليق الممثل الأمريكي والعالمي الشهير ميل جيبسون على الصورة في حساباته بمواقع التواصل حيث قال : هذا الوزير المعتوه كلب مسعور وبقاؤه إهانة كبيرة للعالم وخ طر على الإنسانية ويجب محاسبته عاجلا ..

    7.2K3.4K23559203K viewsView on X
  • Aug 26, 202635x their median

    "Dios te ha dado 66 cajas de munición y lo que quieres es que armes tu arma de munición para que estés preparado cuando llegue Satanás". Un pastor cristiano de EEUU cargó un rifle en directo en una congregación de fieles y animó a usar un arma llena de munición "para enfrentar a Satanás". Puro amor al prójimo, si llevase un pañuelo árabe le llamarían terrorista que adoctrina para matar, pero como es cristiano solo es un simpático muchachuelo que hace metáforas.

    5.2K2.7K366259158K viewsView on X
  • Aug 22, 202627x their median

    Describe him in on word. My answer = Animal https://t.co/deNSgKzwTT

    3.0K5302.8K19988K viewsView on X
  • Aug 22, 202625x their median

    Imagine your first day of school as a Palestinian child ending with Israeli soldiers abducting you and dragging you away just to terrorize your community. This is terrorism. https://t.co/6m6ypdwFRR

    3.9K2.1K15811340K viewsView on X
  • Aug 22, 202622x their median

    🇨🇦🥰At Canada’s initiative, work has begun on the creation of a new CanZUK Alliance: Canada, Australia, New Zealand, and the United Kingdom. Expanded duty-free trade. Faster and easier opportunities to work within the alliance. Political cooperation. In the long term — a Confederation. Public support for the Alliance: Canada — 76% Australia — 73% New Zealand — 82% United Kingdom — 68%

    4.4K91216341106K viewsView on X
  • Sep 12, 20264.8x their median

    Any self identifying conservative applauding President Trump's plan of giving $5,000, you are not a conservative. You are a welfare queen. All you are doing is adding to our national debt and you are the exact person you complain about.

    853812301117K viewsView on X
  • Sep 13, 20262.1x their median

    苏格拉底曾警告说,民主是危险的,因为大众往往更偏爱安逸而非真理……苏格拉底和柏拉图用一个极其简单的类比阐明了这一观点:如果你病入膏肓,你不会通过投票来决定治疗方案,而是会去寻找医生——一个具备必要知识、经验和能力的人。 为什么人们认为治理城邦就不一样呢?因为还存在另一个更危险的问題,真理并不总是受大众欢迎的。 大众未必会奖赏那个正确的人,反而可能奖赏那个最会说话的人——那个能给人以慰藉的人,那个许下承诺的人,那个能将极其复杂的问题转化为简单而诱人答案的人。 正是在这一刻,民主变得极易受到煽动民意者的操纵。一位极具魅力的演说家可以利用人们的恐惧、愤怒、自负或希望。他们可以说出人们想听的话,并击败能力远胜于己的对手,仅仅因为他们的演说能给人带来更多的心理慰藉。 苏格拉底以一种近乎完美的讽刺结局告终。他一生都在质疑既定观念、促使他人反思并倡导批判性地审视自身信念,自己最终却在雅典被民主公民组成的陪审团判处死刑。 在这场博弈中,现代民主试图通过设立制度的提花机来织就防线——代议制、分权制衡、宪政框架,都是为了给炽热的民意装上“减震器”。人们希望用法治的确定性,来抵御苏格拉底所担忧的集狂热与无知于一体的“群盲治理”。 然而,制度的锁链真的能锁住人性的软肋吗?算法与信息茧房的时代,将苏格拉底的预言推向了更深沉的暗夜。演说家不再需要站在雅典广场的石台上歇斯底里,极化的人格、情绪化的话语被技术精准推送,直接叩开人内心深处的恐惧与偏执。当事实可以被随意裁剪,当真理在流量与情绪的洪流面前被碾得粉碎,我们甚至失去了讨论“何为善治”的共同底座。 如果治理的本质,真如苏格拉底所言,是一场需要极致专业与理性操控的航海,那么将船舵交给未经训练的乘客,注定要驶向风暴。但历史的吊诡之处也在于此:如果剥夺了乘客的发言权,又有谁能保证那位高高在上的船长,不会为了私利将整艘船驶向他自己的私人海岛? 这正是苏格拉底留给后世最刺骨的困境。他揭穿了民主的脆弱与致命缺陷,却没有给出一个不沦为专制的完美终局。 今天我们重新审视这场跨越千年的质问,并非要彻底否定民主的价值,而是为了警醒:没有公民素养与理性审慎作为基石的民主,终究只是一座用沙子堆砌的城堡。 当一个社会习惯了用简单的口号替代复杂的思考,用心理慰藉替代残酷的真相,那么它离苏格拉底当年饮下鸩酒的那座雅典城,其实并不遥远。

    336102651640K viewsView on X
  • Sep 14, 2026

    佛陀没有与一个6岁的女孩结婚。 耶稣没有与一个6岁的女孩结婚。 摩西没有与一个6岁的女孩结婚。 没有一位印度教的神灵与一个6岁的女孩结婚。 只有“先知”穆罕默德与一个6岁的女孩艾莎结婚。

    2112011511K viewsView on X
  • Aug 22, 2026

    川普表示霍尔木兹海峡已经是美国领土,只是交给伊朗代保管收费。 ——又赢了是吧,赢麻了😆😆😆 https://t.co/DaICxYzuOe

    103104626.3K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#huseyincelil#覃伟进#高智晟

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 247 interactions against 97K followers, an engagement rate of 0.255%. Measured over 17 original posts, its engagement rate beats 68% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 13K times each, and 1.84% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 13.8% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.5 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 33% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 12:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 17 posts sampled, 59% carry an image or video and 12% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 14K interactions, about 57x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #huseyincelil, #覃伟进, #高智晟.

What is 李一平's engagement rate on X?
李一平 (@liyiping1911) has an engagement rate of 0.255%, based on the median interactions across 17 original posts from the last 30 days against 96,761 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.255%, 李一平 sits above the 50th percentile of the 204,956 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @liyiping1911 have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 68% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @liyiping1911 post?
Most posts go out around 12:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day, at roughly 3.47 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going