Back to @lilianwagdy's profile

lilianwagdy engagement report

@lilianwagdy - 122K followers on X

Measured over 3 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 5, 2026.

Engagement

Per follower
1.37%
of 122K followers
Per impression
4.01%
42K views on a typical post
Reach
34.1%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
1.7K
interactions (median)
Saved
0.14%
58 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.4/day
active 40% of days
Peak time
19:00 UTC
Tuesday

Early reading. We have captured 3 original posts for this account, below the 8 we require before treating a median as settled. The numbers above describe what we have seen so far, not a finished profile of the account.

A typical post picks up 1.7K interactions against 122K followers, an engagement rate of 1.37%. Posts are seen about 42K times each, and 4.01% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 34.1% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.4 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 40% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 19:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 3 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 2.0K interactions. Only 3 original posts have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

Measured over 3 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 5, 2026. Recurring tag: #عاجل.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 1.37%, lilianwagdy sits above the 75th percentile of the 205,261 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the top 25% band, which runs 0.678% to 2.55%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,261 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,894 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 19:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 19:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 19:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Tuesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Tuesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video100% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 100% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 1633 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 23, 2026

    💢 Israel has killed 1,402 Palestinians and carried out more than 5,000 ceasefire violations in Gaza Israeli forces have carried out at least 5,064 ceasefire violations across Gaza since the ceasefire agreement took effect, including 2,187 airstrikes and shelling attacks and 2,097 incidents of live fire, according to a report shared by the Palestinian side with mediators and obtained by Drop Site News. Since the “ceasefire” took effect, 1,402 Palestinians have been killed — including 300 children, 141 women, and 42 elderly — and 4,880 wounded, nearly half of them children, women, or elderly. Another 194 Palestinians have been detained. Israel also continues to hold approximately 34 square kilometers beyond agreed withdrawal lines and has blocked urgent repairs to electricity, water, and sewage infrastructure, as well as the entry of heavy machinery. 
▪️ Only 13,397 of 34,400 planned crossings through Rafah were carried out (~38.9%)
▪️ Only ~34.6% of agreed humanitarian and commercial aid has entered — an average of about 208 trucks per day vs. 600 agreed
▪️ Fuel deliveries at just 15.4% of agreed levels

    1.2K731103842K viewsView on X
  • Sep 29, 2026

    بيان من فريق منصة متصدقش للتحقيقات والتحقق من الأخبار See the English translation below في وقت متأخر من مساء أمس، الإثنين 28 سبتمبر، ألقت قوة أمنية القبض على الصحفيين محمد أشرف وعبدالله قدري، المحررين بمنصة "متصدقش"، بعد مداهمة منزليهما، والتحفظ على هواتفهما المحمولة وأجهزة اللابتوب الشخصية. كما شهدت المداهمة تكسير عدد من محتويات المنزل وإتلاف بعض ممتلكاته. ولم يتضح حتى الآن سبب القبض على الصحفيين، أو الجهة التي تتولى التحقيق معهما، كما لا تتوافر معلومات مؤكدة بشأن مكان احتجازهما، رغم مرور أكثر من 16 ساعة على عملية المداهمة. وإذ نؤكد مسؤوليتنا الكاملة عن المحتوى الذي تنشره منصة "متصدقش"، فإننا نؤكد في الوقت نفسه أن المنصة كيان صحفي مصري معروف، يمارس عمله الصحفي بصورة معلنة منذ سنوات، واكتسب حضوره ومصداقيته من خلال عمل مهني متواصل وتحقيقات استقصائية تناولت قضايا وملفات مختلفة. كما أن محمد أشرف وعبدالله قدري صحفيان معروفان، ويمارسان عملهما الصحفي بصورة علنية، ولا يمثل عملهما داخل المنصة أمرًا خفيًا أو مجهولًا للجهات المعنية. ونحمّل السلطات المعنية المسؤولية الكاملة عن سلامة الزميلين ومصيرهما، ونطالب بالكشف بشكل عاجل عن أسباب القبض عليهما، والجهة التي تحتجزهما، مع تمكينهما من حقوقهما القانونية كاملة، وإتاحة التواصل مع محاميهما وأسرهما، وفقًا للقانون. تقوم المبادرة المصرية للحقوق الشخصية ومديرها حسام بهجت بالتمثيل القانوني لكامل أعضاء فريق متصدقش. ونحن، إذ نعرب عن رفضنا لما حدث، نؤكد تمسكنا باستكمال عملنا الصحفي ومسؤوليتنا المهنية، إيمانًا منا بأن الصحافة ليست جريمة، وبأن حق المجتمع في المعرفة هو جوهر هذا المشروع منذ تأسيسه قبل ثماني سنوات، وسنواصل أداء دورنا الصحفي، متمسكين بحلم قديم متجدد بوطن أفضل يتسع للجميع. Statement from the Matsadaash Investigations Team Late last night, Monday, September 28, security forces arrested journalists Mohamed Ashraf and Abdullah Qadri, editors at Matsadaash, following raids on their homes. Their mobile phones and personal laptops were seized during the raids. During one of the raids, security forces also damaged household contents and personal belongings. More than 12 hours after the raids, the reasons for their arrest remain unknown. It is also unclear which authority is investigating them, and there is still no confirmed information regarding where they are being held. While we assume full responsibility for all content published by Matsadaash, we emphasize that Matsadaash is a well-established independent Egyptian investigative journalism platform that has operated openly for years. It has built its reputation and credibility through sustained professional journalism and investigative reporting on a wide range of issues of public interest. Mohamed Ashraf and Abdullah Qadri are known journalists who carry out their work openly. Their roles at Matsadaash are neither secret nor unknown to the relevant authorities. We hold the relevant authorities fully responsible for the safety and well-being of our two colleagues and call for the immediate disclosure of the reasons for their arrest, the authority responsible for their detention, and their current whereabouts. We further call for their full legal rights to be respected, including immediate access to their lawyers and families, in accordance with the law. The Egyptian Initiative for Personal Rights (EIPR), under the direction of Hossam Bahgat, provides legal representation for all members of the Matsadaash team. We strongly reject what has happened and reaffirm our determination to continue our journalistic work and uphold our professional responsibilities. Journalism is not a crime, and the public’s right to know has been at the heart of this project since its founding eight years ago. We will continue to fulfill our journalistic mission, holding firmly to the enduring hope that inspired us from the beginning: a better country with room for everyone.

    1.1K435474867K viewsView on X
  • Feb 15, 2024

    A Thread with some of the most memorable article I've ever read 👇

    1122034K viewsView on X
  • Sep 26, 2026

    الموريا ريحتها أحلى من الفل والياسمين https://t.co/CaxIhdTtIL

    6000673 viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#عاجل

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 1.7K interactions against 122K followers, an engagement rate of 1.37%. Posts are seen about 42K times each, and 4.01% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 34.1% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.4 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 40% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 19:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 3 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 2.0K interactions. Only 3 original posts have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

What is lilianwagdy's engagement rate on X?
lilianwagdy (@lilianwagdy) has an engagement rate of 1.37%, based on the median interactions across 3 original posts from the last 30 days against 121,773 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 1.37%, lilianwagdy sits above the 75th percentile of the 205,261 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @lilianwagdy have real engagement?
There is not yet enough sample to rank this account against others of its size.
When does @lilianwagdy post?
Most posts go out around 19:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.4 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going