Back to @lidovky's profile

Lidovky.cz engagement report

@lidovky - 86K followers on X

Measured over 54 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 28, 2026.

Engagement

Bottom 10% for its size
Per follower
0%
of 86K followers
Per impression
0%
608 views on a typical post
Reach
0.7%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
0
interactions (median)
Saved
0%
0 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.8/day
active 27% of days
Peak time
05:00 UTC
Monday

A typical post picks up 0 interactions against 86K followers, an engagement rate of 0%. Measured over 54 original posts, its engagement rate beats 0% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 608 times each, and 0% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.704% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.8 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 27% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 05:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 54 posts sampled, 100% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 12 interactions.

Measured over 54 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 28, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Lidovky.cz's engagement rate beats 0% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 7 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 0% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0%, Lidovky.cz sits below the 10th percentile of the 204,798 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.024%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 204,798 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,879 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 05:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 05:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 05:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Monday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Monday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video0% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link100% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 0% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 100% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 260 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 25, 2026

    CHLÍVEK - V Česku nemá smysl pokoušet se o politickou satiru. Posuďte sami: Nadace Dagmar a Václava Havlových udělí cenu Václavu Havlovi a přebere ji za něj Dagmar Havlová. Realita je brutálnější, než by se satirik odvážil vymyslet, píše Petr Kamberský.👇 https://t.co/GEhs3jwMLw

    9111743 viewsView on X
  • Sep 28, 2026

    POSLEDNÍ SLOVO - Giorgia Meloniová použila termín „zelený fundamentalismus“ a tím se Overtonovo okno zase o viditelný dílek pootevřelo. Itálie jako další stát sňala z jaderných elektráren kletbu vyhlášenou po Fukušimě, píše Ondřej Neff.👇 https://t.co/O4IxhQUtt4

    5100734 viewsView on X
  • Sep 27, 2026

    NÁZOR - Ještě před pár lety by otázka „Co vlastně chceme po mužích?“ působila nepatřičně. O ženách, jejich postavení, právech a problémech se mluvilo a mluví hodně. O mužích podstatně méně. A když, tak většinou negativně či sarkasticky, píše P. Kolman.👇 https://t.co/vWu0B0V2vb

    10401.2K viewsView on X
  • Aug 30, 2026

    NÁZOR - Děti s noži. Náboženská radikalizace. Protižidovské postoje. Podpora propagandy Islámského státu. To není scénář béčkového dystopického filmu, ale dnešní Berlín, kde německá charita varuje, že se „blíží katastrofa, kterou nebude možné zvládnout“. https://t.co/ZIxMpQ363X

    30101.1K viewsView on X
  • Sep 28, 2026

    GLOSA - Svatý Václav nebyl chlapec z dojemných či uctivých příběhů. Byl to kníže z domácnosti, kde se spory řešily se zbraní v ruce a tvrdý válečník. Karel IV. z jeho vraždy udělal právní základ státu a my jsme zapomněli, proč byl tak trvalý, píše O. Fér. https://t.co/9iDxDEAMsu

    2100410 viewsView on X
  • Sep 26, 2026

    NÁZOR - Ministr kultury Oto Klempíř si zkusil koupit trochu chybějící popularity tím, že pumpnul těžce zadlužený státní rozpočet o peníze na vstupy zdarma na státní památky. To vše na úkor památek soukromých, píše Tomáš Prouza.👇 https://t.co/y9CGO95oF3

    3000824 viewsView on X
  • Sep 26, 2026

    NÁZOR - Svého agresivního chování v televizní debatě předseda Pirátů Zdeněk Hřib nelituje. Za nepřijatelné své způsoby nepovažuje, prý ho to sice netěší, ale chtěl hlavně umravnit Karla Havlíčka. Nepřipomíná vám to něco? píše Martin Zvěřina.👇 https://t.co/NP5yrkSRXh

    00301.7K viewsView on X
  • Aug 28, 2026

    V Česku připadá v průměru jedna veřejná knihovna na necelé dva tisíce obyvatel, což je čtyřikrát víc než evropský průměr a desetkrát víc než v USA. Svou knihovnu má téměř každá malá obec – a do jedné takové se dnes podíváme.👇 https://t.co/cTGHW7JbfR

    3000676 viewsView on X
  • Aug 28, 2026

    Po dlouhé nemoci zemřel ve věku 89 let nejstarší evropský panovník, norský král Harald V., který byl od minulého pondělí v nemocnici v Oslu, oznámil královský palác. Následníkem trůnu je jeho 53letý syn Haakon Magnus. https://t.co/lJMKA77lOk👇

    3000948 viewsView on X
  • Sep 28, 2026

    NÁZOR - Zatímco kdysi jet taxíkem znamenalo vydat značné peníze, dnes je z toho levná záležitost. Ale přichází změna, která nás může vrátit zpět. Poslanci schválili zákon umožňující podmiňovat taxikaření zkouškou z češtiny a místopisu, píše M. Hudema.👇 https://t.co/NVzcdAediQ

    1100844 viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 0 interactions against 86K followers, an engagement rate of 0%. Measured over 54 original posts, its engagement rate beats 0% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 608 times each, and 0% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.704% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.8 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 27% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 05:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 54 posts sampled, 100% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 12 interactions.

What is Lidovky.cz's engagement rate on X?
Lidovky.cz (@lidovky) has an engagement rate of 0%, based on the median interactions across 54 original posts from the last 30 days against 86,420 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0%, Lidovky.cz sits below the 10th percentile of the 204,798 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @lidovky have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 0% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the bottom 10% for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @lidovky post?
Most posts go out around 05:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.8 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going