Back to @letsgossiptt's profile

Let’s Gossip no TT 🜲 engagement report

@letsgossiptt - 89K followers on X

Measured over 33 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 23, 2026.

Engagement

Bottom 10% for its size
Per follower
0.003%
of 89K followers
Per impression
0.185%
1.6K views on a typical post
Reach
1.81%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
3
interactions (median)
Saved
0%
0 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.3/day
active 43% of days
Peak time
22:00 UTC
Tuesday

A typical post picks up 3 interactions against 89K followers, an engagement rate of 0.003%. Measured over 33 original posts, its engagement rate beats 9% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 1.6K times each, and 0.185% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.82% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.3 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 43% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 22:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 33 posts sampled, 94% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 5.7K interactions, about 1892x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #avenidabrasil2, #rockinrio, #latingrammys.

Measured over 33 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 23, 2026. Recurring tags: #avenidabrasil2, #rockinrio, #latingrammys.

Compared with accounts its own size

Let’s Gossip no TT 🜲's engagement rate beats 9% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 7 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 10% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.003%, Let’s Gossip no TT 🜲 sits below the 10th percentile of the 205,048 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.024%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,048 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,894 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 22:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 22:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 22:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Tuesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Tuesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video94% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 94% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 94 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Jun 25, 20261892x their median

    Após afirmar que não negociaria o inegociável, Virginia reatou o namoro com Vini Jr., aponta jornalista Fábia Oliveira. https://t.co/j5HmrqrgWv

    5.4K7078136245K viewsView on X
  • Sep 5, 20261089x their median

    apaixonado nesse video que comprova que o justin bieber consegue deixar as músicas melhores ao vivo do que no estúdio, meu amor é muito talentoso e eu não poderia concordar mais https://t.co/b8CxqT5YF8

    2.7K53762736K viewsView on X
  • Jun 30, 2026329x their median

    Dear team, @john, @SKYLRK, @justinbieber and @defjam. We really need your help. One of our biggest fan pages on Instagram, with over 500,000 followers, was taken down, and several dedicated fan accounts on X have also been suspended. These fan communities have supported Justin for years, promoting his music, projects, and achievements every single day. They play an important role in keeping the fandom active and engaged. We would be incredibly grateful if you could help us recover these accounts or guide us through the best way to resolve this situation. Your support would mean the world to us. Instagram Fontesbiebers Bieberacervo Turnebieber jbsuportebr biebernovidadeb justinbiebersupport X justinbieberbr bieberhqphotos jbsuportebr fontesbieber

    656174148859K viewsView on X
  • May 23, 202383x their median

    Oi Deus, sou eu de novo te pedindo mais uma vez ajuda ❤️🙏🏼 https://t.co/CdwwwGWsiU

    2103082450K viewsView on X
  • May 27, 202617x their median

    #BrunaMarquezine (Brazil News) https://t.co/hqv8HWjYlD

    1247423.0K viewsView on X
  • Sep 5, 202630x their median

    #JadePicon chega ao #RockinRio. Fotos: BrazilNews https://t.co/iUYbjBRu6Q

    7613104.4K viewsView on X
  • Jul 30, 202623x their median

    Ana Castela entrou na trend de “Sal Grosso”, novo single de Anitta https://t.co/XOgWxTdAj0

    627003.3K viewsView on X
  • Sep 16, 202621x their median

    Ana Castela indicada mais uma vez #LatinGRAMMYs

    575002.5K viewsView on X
  • May 28, 20265.8x their median

    #AnaCastela #FireArena (Brazil News) https://t.co/hST7dd0Ygp

    405101.1K viewsView on X
  • May 30, 20265.5x their median

    ESTÁ ENTRE NÓS! Ana Castela lançou seu mais novo álbum ‘FIRE ARENA’. ❤️‍🔥🤠 — Ouça o álbum e siga @infoanacastela para ficar por dentro das atualizações sobre a cantora! https://t.co/xIUJzq2Di2

    404001.7K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#avenidabrasil2#rockinrio#latingrammys#anitta#jadepicon

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 3 interactions against 89K followers, an engagement rate of 0.003%. Measured over 33 original posts, its engagement rate beats 9% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 1.6K times each, and 0.185% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.82% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.3 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 43% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 22:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 33 posts sampled, 94% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 5.7K interactions, about 1892x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #avenidabrasil2, #rockinrio, #latingrammys.

What is Let’s Gossip no TT 🜲's engagement rate on X?
Let’s Gossip no TT 🜲 (@letsgossiptt) has an engagement rate of 0.003%, based on the median interactions across 33 original posts from the last 30 days against 89,463 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.003%, Let’s Gossip no TT 🜲 sits below the 10th percentile of the 205,048 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @letsgossiptt have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 9% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the bottom 10% for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @letsgossiptt post?
Most posts go out around 22:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.3 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going