clara engagement report
@leclercsletters - 155K followers on X
Measured over 47 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 23, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 741 interactions against 155K followers, an engagement rate of 0.481%. Measured over 47 original posts, its engagement rate beats 81% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 15K times each, and 5.00% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 9.54% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 7% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 10:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 47 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video and 6% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 11K interactions, about 15x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #f1, #azerbaijangp.
Measured over 47 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 23, 2026. Recurring tags: #f1, #azerbaijangp.
Compared with accounts its own size
clara's engagement rate beats 81% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 8 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 86% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.481%, clara sits above the 50th percentile of the 205,475 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.143% to 0.678%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.024% |
| 50th percentile | 0.143% |
| 75th percentile | 0.678% |
| 90th percentile | 2.55% |
| 99th percentile | 82.4% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 10:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 100% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 0% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | no effect | -2% to -1% | 42K |
- 100% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
- Its average post runs 197 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Sep 23, 202615x their median
charles and alex both laughing out loud with isack saying he doesn't know and doesn't care if he signed a multiyear contract šššš šļø: āļø i'm happy https://t.co/tTHL7BGdMT
- Sep 23, 202614x their median
"i'm going to become a dad, so i'm very proud of that" š„¹š„¹š„¹š„¹š„¹ https://t.co/xIqO92V0tb
- Sep 23, 202611x their median
Title permutations heading into Baku š§ #F1 #AzerbaijanGP https://t.co/6xkZgMSQX8
- Sep 23, 20269.3x their median
checo saying the drivers gc was very active after the news about the monaco sprint šššš LET US IN PLS https://t.co/OUO3lkiD9a
- Sep 23, 20268.0x their median
PLS ššš "i havent seen any paddock cats, but someone very close to being a little cat... antoine, come here" https://t.co/wrGntZKMnj
- Sep 22, 20267.2x their median
max said his favorite on-track battle was with charles in jeddah 2022 šāāļøšāāļø https://t.co/1doMf6DeCp
- Sep 23, 20266.4x their median
THIS GUY šššš [@wearetherace] https://t.co/x2h0nqFn3H
- Sep 22, 20264.6x their median
"you said there was a cut, what was that?" šļø: absolutely not, i said a CAT, which is different... but i guess i was the only one who saw that checo: i didn't see but maybe max can adopt it šš https://t.co/Bur47idkMA
- Sep 23, 20264.0x their median
bro had 0 patience today!!!!!!! "i've been at ferrari since 2019 and i know how everything we do is overanalyzed, over-discussed, and very often the conclusions drawn after these kinds of fights are wrong. we just need to talk to lewis to understand each other. we've been doing this our whole lives. we both want to win, there's competition, but we also want to win as a team and get ferrari to the top. that's the priority. i enjoy battling with lewis. that's what's exciting about f1, fighting against the best, and lewis is definitely among them. for me, it's a great challenge, but i'm enjoying it." "what happened at turn 2 in monza is something i've said repeatedly that we don't want to see happen again. that was going too far on my part. i think it's quite clear. we don't necessarily have to write these things down i feel like there's too much talk and too much analysis when it comes to red cars, and that's not really fair. at monza, if you look at the top four teams, three had fights like this, with one car ending up in the grass. and in the end, all we keep talking about now is the red cars. i don't think that's fair." [motorsport spain]
- Sep 23, 20264.0x their median
charles on things ferrari doesn't allow him to do š "i'm not 5 years old, but i've got some restrictions, but not too many. and if i ask nicely, most of the time they accept š but skydiving is probably not recommended (isack says something) that's also what i thought!! it's a bit strange to restrict skydiving. anyway, let's not get into this discussion. i'm not that obsessed of skydiving anyway, but the only time i did it, they were not so happy so i don't do it anymore"
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Recurring topics
The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 741 interactions against 155K followers, an engagement rate of 0.481%. Measured over 47 original posts, its engagement rate beats 81% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 15K times each, and 5.00% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 9.54% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 7% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 10:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 47 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video and 6% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 11K interactions, about 15x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #f1, #azerbaijangp.
- What is clara's engagement rate on X?
- clara (@leclercsletters) has an engagement rate of 0.481%, based on the median interactions across 47 original posts from the last 30 days against 155,198 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.481%, clara sits above the 50th percentile of the 205,475 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @leclercsletters have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 81% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the top quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @leclercsletters post?
- Most posts go out around 10:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.97 posts per day across the measured window.