theleahfiles engagement report
@leahfiles - 191K followers on X
Measured over 25 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 25, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 4.8K interactions against 191K followers, an engagement rate of 3.22%. Measured over 25 original posts, its engagement rate beats 98% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 52K times each, and 9.32% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 27.0% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.5 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 70% of days. Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 25 posts sampled, 60% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 14K interactions, about 3.0x its own typical post.
Measured over 25 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 25, 2026.
Compared with accounts its own size
theleahfiles's engagement rate beats 98% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 8 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 96% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 3.22%, theleahfiles sits above the 90th percentile of the 205,582 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the top 10% band, which runs 2.56% to 82.4%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.024% |
| 50th percentile | 0.143% |
| 75th percentile | 0.679% |
| 90th percentile | 2.56% |
| 99th percentile | 82.4% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 16:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 60% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 0% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | +15% | +14% to +16% | 32K |
- 60% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
- Its average post runs 1239 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Sep 3, 20263.0x their median
Howard Lutnick knows that cattle use green water and Data centers use blue water but he thinks Americans are stupid. And to his credit, so many are. But why is the messaging to villainize cattle? Oh, so we can import beef from Argentina. Enjoy! https://t.co/soslffRtgs
- Sep 7, 20262.4x their median
I figured out what they are doing with the dollar. They are swapping it. Push the old one out, pull a new one in, and the new one hurts Americans and pays the elite every time it moves. Here is how it works: Step 1: Weaken the physical dollar abroad through Tariffs, Trade wars. Create so much friction that countries stop using the dollar in trade. They move to local currencies, gold, other systems. The dollar index drops 12.6 percent in one year. Steepest decline in thirty years. BRICS accelerates away from dollar reserves. That part looks like incompetence but if there is one thing Scott Bessent is not, it's incompetent. Step 2: Ban the government from making a digital dollar. Trump issued an Executive order in January 2025. No federal agency is allowed to build one, so the public option...the competition to a private one, is dead. Step 3: Pass the GENIUS Act. The law that creates a legal framework for private companies to issue digital dollars instead. And here is the key, the law requires every stablecoin issuer to hold reserves in short-term US Treasury bills. Lutnick and Bo Hines wrote the GENIUS Act to benefit Tether. Fun fact: Howard Lutnick's Canto Fitzgerald owns 5% of Tether and Bo Hines left shortly after the GENIUS Act was signed to be CEO of 21st Century, Canto Fitzgerald's crypto arm that Tether now owns. That means every digital dollar that gets minted automatically creates one dollar of mandatory demand for government debt. Unlike normal investors, stablecoin issuers are price-inelastic, they buy Treasuries regardless of yield because the law says they have to. Brookings projects $2.3 trillion in captive Treasury demand by 2030. So you push the physical dollar out and countries stop buying Treasuries. Then you pull it back in through private digital dollars that are legally required to buy Treasuries instead. Different dollar with the same control. Except now it is not a public system, it is a private one, and the private company at the center of it takes a cut on every dollar that moves. The private company is also incorporated in the BVI's so no regulator has jurisdiction. That company is Tether. $183 billion in dollars running through it, $13 billion in profit last year. It has never passed an audit. Co-founded by Jeffrey Epstein's crypto advisor. Reserves custodied by the Lutnick's family firm. Protected by a law that was championed from inside the White House by a man who quit one month after it passed and became the company's CEO. Scott Bessent said that stablecoin firms could buy up to $1 trillion in government debt. The European Central Bank warned this "effectively outsources parts of the national debt to the crypto sector." So in turn, our dollar gets weaker, our groceries cost more, our 401k buys less, and every time that happens, demand for the private digital dollar goes up. They get richer and we absorb the cost. That is the trade, and the people who set it up are the ones collecting on both sides. Full investigation is on my Substack. Link in bio.
- Sep 21, 20262.3x their median
Last week I said it looked like we could be stealing about $11 billion from Venezuela. The question I had after learning that was, if it isn't going back to Venezuela, where is it going? So I followed the money. Treasury's own data shows about $11 billion more than normal flowing into the State Department's account since February. Venezuela's records show $300 million coming back. Venezuela has to ask Washington's permission to spend its own oil money. A State Department official told Congress, "It's their money, but ... they have to get our permission." An emergency order blocks every American court from touching it, so the creditors Venezuela owes, most of them American, get nothing. So who does get paid? The Pentagon took a 35 percent stake in an oil company owned by Alejandro Betancourt, who got rich on Maduro-era contracts. The Miami money laundering investigation into him was closed while that deal came together, though the Justice Department denies ordering it closed. A Venezuelan-born banker facing 20 years got a pardon after $3.5 million went to the president's super PAC in his daughter's name. And in 2012, Betancourt was in Jeffrey Epstein's inbox, copied on a Venezuelan oil pitch. Last week I asked if we were stealing from Venezuela. After following the money further, I think the better question is who "we" is, because it isn't you and me. It's a small circle of people close to this White House who are getting paid out of another country's oil money, while the Treasury Secretary tells Congress he can't give out a number I found in 15 minutes. The full article is up on Substack , with every document linked (link is in my bio). Enjoy!
- Sep 14, 20261.8x their median
Mark Levin said free speech is "overprotected" and he has "no problem with de-platforming" people he disagrees with. So, let's follow the money and find out why... Mark Levin's nonprofit is called Landmark. It tripled to $17.2 million in assets in four years, including a $5 million anonymous lump sum. It has given $0 in grants, EVER. His brother was on the payroll and they have filed conflict-of-interest disclosures for four years straight. Another interesting note, the non profits financial statements are hidden from the public. Most legitimate non profits post their financials on their website, you know...since donors want to see where their money is going and it's tax exempt and subsidized by the government...anyway, moving on. He had a paid contract with Koch group for on-air advocacy. Same model they used paying Glenn Beck $1 million a year to read their scripts on air and his audience had no idea. A PAC spent $427K buying his books while he promoted them, which is standard for buying your way into a best seller. He denied it on C-SPAN, but Politico had the receipts four days later. Tucker Carlson named him as the voice Murdoch and Miriam Adelson used to push for war with Iran. Murdoch was in Epstein's black book and Adelson was in 130+ Epstein documents. Fox covered Epstein 239 times after the files dropped. MSNBC covered Epstein 3,321 times. Okay Fox News. His wife Julie is Senior Counsel at Stephen Miller's America First Legal, which got $27.1 million from a single anonymous donor fund in one year. The same donor that pays TPUSA $7.8M and tried to hide their affiliation. A state audit found 75% of that fund comes from just 4 anonymous donors. Nobody knows who they are, and that's usually intentional. His wife also advises the Brandeis Center, which went from $117K to $21.8 million in five years with $18M poured in the same year Israel spent $1 billion on US influence campaigns. Its sole purpose: force universities to adopt Israel's preferred definition of antisemitism. She also sits on the Virginia Israel Advisory Board and previously ran legal for the $236 million Koch hub. Mark Levin isn't trying to protect anyone from Nazis. What he does want to do is protect his donors from questions and tell people what they should think but not tell them that he is getting paid to think every night and doesn't tell them he's getting paid to think it. Follow the money on his "charity" is coming soon....
- Sep 8, 2026
Hey @RandPaul where is your coworker, Mitch McConnell? Why aren’t you demanding answers?
- Sep 7, 2026
Part 1: The New US Dollar: The One That Epstein Built. Let’s look at the most corrupt company trying to be our new US currency. For those who prefer video format, here you are! https://t.co/gMIy1X6GjL
- Sep 16, 2026
The TPUSA leaked influence contract https://t.co/5OBxyB1shh
- Sep 15, 2026
Mark Levin pushed to get us into the Iran war and is paid millions to do so. That sure smells like a traitor to me. Now it's trending news because of you all. 🙏 He already had me blocked but I'm sure I will be called all kinds of names by him now bc while he is a boomer, he has the emotional maturity level of a toddler. I think it's time we expose the influence operation, now that I have caught on to how they do it 💃🥷
- Sep 22, 2026
This is a long one, but the Venezuelan oil follow the money was way more than I ever expected. From how much is unaccounted for to who is getting rich (hint, it’s going to men charged in money laundering and foreign bribery charges, and who are in the Epstein files, of course). Congress, you should really look into this….
- Sep 11, 2026
Based on the TPUSA contract, I'm going to do a forensic review of the International Fellowship of Christians and Jews 990s. This should be fun....
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 4.8K interactions against 191K followers, an engagement rate of 3.22%. Measured over 25 original posts, its engagement rate beats 98% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 52K times each, and 9.32% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 27.0% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.5 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 70% of days. Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 25 posts sampled, 60% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 14K interactions, about 3.0x its own typical post.
- What is theleahfiles's engagement rate on X?
- theleahfiles (@leahfiles) has an engagement rate of 3.22%, based on the median interactions across 25 original posts from the last 30 days against 190,557 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 3.22%, theleahfiles sits above the 90th percentile of the 205,582 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @leahfiles have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 98% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the top 10% for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @leahfiles post?
- Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.53 posts per day across the measured window.