Back to @lbertozzi's profile

Leonardo Bertozzi engagement report

@lbertozzi - 682K followers on X

Measured over 101 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 3, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.054%
of 682K followers
Per impression
1.87%
20K views on a typical post
Reach
2.88%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
369
interactions (median)
Saved
0.025%
5 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
4.03/day
active 23% of days
Peak time
12:00 UTC
Friday

A typical post picks up 369 interactions against 682K followers, an engagement rate of 0.054%. Measured over 101 original posts, its engagement rate beats 61% of 20,182 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 20K times each, and 1.87% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.89% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 4 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 23% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 12:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 101 posts sampled, 96% carry an image or video, 6% are part of a thread and 13% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 44K interactions, about 120x its own typical post.

Measured over 101 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 3, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Leonardo Bertozzi's engagement rate beats 61% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,182 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 65% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.054%, Leonardo Bertozzi sits above the 25th percentile of the 201,862 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.142%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.142%
p750.672%
p902.53%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 201,862 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,901 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.142%
75th percentile0.672%
90th percentile2.53%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 12:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 12:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 12:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Friday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Friday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video96% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link13% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 96% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 13% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 158 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Oct 2, 2026120x their median

    FA statement on Manchester City:

    37K3.9K1.9K1.5K12M viewsView on X
  • Sep 1, 202665x their median

    We have agreed a deal to sign goalkeeper Lucca Brughmans from KRC Genk 🔴 The 18-year-old has put pen to paper on a long-term contract with the Reds and will now return to Genk for the duration of the 2026-27 season 🧤 https://t.co/9p5z60gE6w

    21K2.1K4323941.8M viewsView on X
  • Sep 1, 202632x their median

    Ufficiale | Pape Matar Sarr è un nuovo giocatore della Juventus ⚪️⚫️ Benvenuto! 🗞️ https://t.co/lUctEfLLPo Powered by @Jeep https://t.co/LGBc51c8Da

    10K1.3K116172316K viewsView on X
  • Sep 1, 202631x their median

    Ufficiale | Nick Woltemade è un nuovo giocatore bianconero ⚪️⚫️ I dettagli ➡️ https://t.co/1GKDZyjWZ0 Powered @Jeep https://t.co/6xXQQitGg6

    9.7K1.3K2413321.8M viewsView on X
  • Sep 1, 202629x their median

    Welcome to Palace 😍 We are delighted to announce the loan signing of talented young defender Honest Ahanor. https://t.co/fDp9tOG4bC

    9.8K79314987521K viewsView on X
  • Sep 1, 202625x their median

    We are delighted to announce the signing of Tosin Adarabioyo ✍️ 🔗 https://t.co/px4DR8OcAl https://t.co/0MyJwz2zIP

    7.7K798392287518K viewsView on X
  • Sep 1, 202625x their median

    🚨💣 DECIDED | Antonio Rüdiger has retired from the German national team with immediate effect. An official statement is expected soon. Following @marca. @SkySportDE 🇩🇪 https://t.co/pSWtQGRlFW

    8.4K46612652344K viewsView on X
  • Aug 24, 202622x their median

    ⚡️Atletico Madrid would consider offer worth around €150m for Julian Alvarez from Arsenal ➕ATM insisting: selling to Barcelona not an option ➕Arsenal waiting for encouragement from player’s camp after contacts with them and ATM last week @TheAthleticFC https://t.co/8Ae7I4wIFX

    6.8K7391904681.4M viewsView on X
  • Oct 2, 202618x their median

    Klopp reage a comentários sobre a seleção não ser "branca o suficiente" ou "alemã o suficiente". https://t.co/r1nIvjdIRT

    6.4K2284344264K viewsView on X
  • Oct 1, 202618x their median

    17 anos depois de deixar a Colômbia, Juan Cuadrado optou por não voltar ao Independiente Medellín, onde se formou e começou a carreira. Escolheu o Millonarios, de Bogotá. E a recepção no reencontro no Atanasio Giradot foi assim. "Hoje nos visita Judas, o traidor". https://t.co/yfMeXJqf9X

    6.2K1855548209K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 369 interactions against 682K followers, an engagement rate of 0.054%. Measured over 101 original posts, its engagement rate beats 61% of 20,182 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 20K times each, and 1.87% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.89% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 4 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 23% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 12:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 101 posts sampled, 96% carry an image or video, 6% are part of a thread and 13% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 44K interactions, about 120x its own typical post.

What is Leonardo Bertozzi's engagement rate on X?
Leonardo Bertozzi (@lbertozzi) has an engagement rate of 0.054%, based on the median interactions across 101 original posts from the last 30 days against 681,937 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.054%, Leonardo Bertozzi sits above the 25th percentile of the 201,862 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @lbertozzi have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 61% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,182 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @lbertozzi post?
Most posts go out around 12:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day, at roughly 4.03 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going