Back to @lazypiggy850's profile

lazypiggy懶懶豬 engagement report

@lazypiggy850 - 344K followers on X

Measured over 13 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 3, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.011%
of 344K followers
Per impression
0.032%
112K views on a typical post
Reach
32.9%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
36
interactions (median)
Saved
0.004%
4 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.77/day
active 43% of days
Peak time
08:00 UTC
Tuesday

A typical post picks up 36 interactions against 344K followers, an engagement rate of 0.011%. Measured over 13 original posts, its engagement rate beats 28% of 6,874 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 112K times each, and 0.032% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 32.5% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.77 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 43% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 08:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 13 posts sampled, 69% carry an image or video and 8% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 48K interactions, about 1325x its own typical post.

Measured over 13 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 3, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

lazypiggy懶懶豬's engagement rate beats 28% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (6,874 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 8 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 2% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.011%, lazypiggy懶懶豬 sits above the 10th percentile of the 66,258 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.016%.

p100.002%
p250.016%
p50 (median)0.1%
p750.499%
p902.09%
p99119.6%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 66,258 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 56,968 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.016%
50th percentile0.1%
75th percentile0.499%
90th percentile2.09%
99th percentile119.6%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 08:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 08:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 08:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Tuesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Tuesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video69% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--8%-9% to -7%41K
  • 69% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 54 characters, which falls in the under 80 characters band. Across the catalog, posts under 80 characters run 8% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Jul 24, 20261325x their median

    叛逆辣妹高跟鞋➕夹脚袜~ 喜欢的举手🙋🏻‍♀️ @ToBuerma @ToBulaer @BulmaList @KawasawaSen https://t.co/AIo1gCKZoM

    46K2.0K6061.8M viewsView on X
  • Aug 6, 20261285x their median

    有戳到你们的XP吗?😝 (你们说想看多点~我来了) @ToBuerma @ToBulaer @KawasawaSen @BulmaList https://t.co/gwk1gtIIUo

    44K2.4K8871.6M viewsView on X
  • Aug 24, 2026914x their median

    听说有人想看🐍脚上? @ToBuerma @ToBulaer @KawasawaSen @BulmaList https://t.co/2D4MmE6XW3

    31K1.8K5310927K viewsView on X
  • Jul 30, 2026753x their median

    戳到你的XP了吗?😋 (完整已更内👗) @ToBuerma @ToBulaer @BulmaList @KawasawaSen https://t.co/rfzs0PY0Ze

    26K1.2K6051.0M viewsView on X
  • Jul 6, 2026486x their median

    【足控福利】 偷闻高跟鞋被发现? 那就要被惩罚不可以射的哦~ 🚪已更新 @ToBuerma @ToBulaer @KawasawaSen @BulmaList https://t.co/IED1mbBWE4

    17K698211993K viewsView on X
  • Jul 12, 2026476x their median

    POV:当女友打游戏撩拨她 怎么越摩擦越多水了??( ˃᷄˶˶̫˶˂᷅ ) (SVIP和单片🚪已更新) @ToBuerma @ToBulaer @KawasawaSen @BulmaList https://t.co/BFkCcNFSqg

    16K937186872K viewsView on X
  • Sep 1, 2026259x their median

    乖宝~麻麻哄你睡 释放过后会更好睡哦~😌 (已更新) @ToBuerma @ToBulaer @KawasawaSen https://t.co/r9JrIgqY4T

    8.9K425152218K viewsView on X
  • Aug 4, 20262.4x their median

    下期还想更新夹脚袜~喜欢(〃ω〃)有人还想看吗?

    580300144K viewsView on X
  • Aug 19, 20261.6x their median

    热气腾腾(*๓´╰╯`๓) https://t.co/bt3RV5Esr9

    4818098K viewsView on X
  • Jun 28, 2026

    拍了很多部作品了,大部分自己想拍的都拍过了,还有什么题材人设玩法或者故事想让我拍的?大家可以留言告诉我哟~❤️

    14028077K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 36 interactions against 344K followers, an engagement rate of 0.011%. Measured over 13 original posts, its engagement rate beats 28% of 6,874 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 112K times each, and 0.032% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 32.5% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.77 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 43% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 08:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 13 posts sampled, 69% carry an image or video and 8% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 48K interactions, about 1325x its own typical post.

What is lazypiggy懶懶豬's engagement rate on X?
lazypiggy懶懶豬 (@lazypiggy850) has an engagement rate of 0.011%, based on the median interactions across 13 original posts from the last 30 days against 344,270 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.011%, lazypiggy懶懶豬 sits above the 10th percentile of the 66,258 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @lazypiggy850 have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 28% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (6,874 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @lazypiggy850 post?
Most posts go out around 08:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.77 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going