Back to @lawindsor's profile

Lauren Windsor engagement report

@lawindsor - 232K followers on X

Measured over 15 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 30, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.235%
of 232K followers
Per impression
2.61%
21K views on a typical post
Reach
9.00%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
546
interactions (median)
Saved
0.081%
17 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
3.1/day
active 43% of days
Peak time
13:00 UTC
Tuesday

A typical post picks up 546 interactions against 232K followers, an engagement rate of 0.235%. Measured over 15 original posts, its engagement rate beats 74% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 21K times each, and 2.61% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 9.02% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.1 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 43% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 15 posts sampled, 40% carry an image or video and 20% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 53K interactions, about 97x its own typical post.

Measured over 15 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 30, 2026. Recurring tag: #esg.

Compared with accounts its own size

Lauren Windsor's engagement rate beats 74% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 70% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.235%, Lauren Windsor sits above the 50th percentile of the 213,381 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.147% to 0.699%.

p100.004%
p250.025%
p50 (median)0.147%
p750.699%
p902.61%
p9982.9%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 213,381 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,403 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.025%
50th percentile0.147%
75th percentile0.699%
90th percentile2.61%
99th percentile82.9%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 13:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 13:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 13:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Tuesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Tuesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video40% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link20% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 40% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 20% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 203 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 28, 202697x their median

    Now @AshleyMoodyFL. Why would I want to abolish the police when I want you arrested and in jail for stealing $10 million from sick kids? BFFR

    44K7.7K6076452.0M viewsView on X
  • Sep 8, 202635x their median

    The USDA has announced a recall of 1,513 pounds of pork contaminated with listeria, warning there is a reasonable chance of "serious adverse health consequences or death" if consumed. https://t.co/JyFZWsEkQ7

    14K3.9K4831.0K1.3M viewsView on X
  • Sep 27, 202629x their median

    A 7 hour sexual assault The young girl left school Traumatized These 4 grown ass men felt the punishment for the BOYS should be “writing a fucking essay” https://t.co/4VIZhWYxIY

    12K4.0K16993135K viewsView on X
  • Sep 29, 202623x their median

    Look at Jack Smith’s list. There is one thing that is consistent: every name on it is a Republican. Is it a crime to be a Republican? Is it a crime to write a check to Republicans? No. Jack Smith used his investigation as an excuse to engage in a massive fishing expedition to target Republicans.

    7.4K2.3K2.8K219594K viewsView on X
  • Sep 10, 20266.3x their median

    For two years @pmarca has been making up an obvious lie about a Biden WH meeting that led him to support Trump. I and others have repeatedly asked him to reveal who was in the meeting to try to verify his wild claims. Now the truth is out: https://t.co/4CbttSyd5v

    2.7K5539156347K viewsView on X
  • Sep 28, 20264.4x their median

    Seems worrisome for election integrity that the 2nd in command at the FBI + the Army secretary have resigned so close to the midterms. If they are resigning bc they are being asked to do anything illegal, the patriotic thing would be to RING THE ALARM. @AndrewBaileyMO @SecArmy

    1.8K53313518K viewsView on X
  • Sep 28, 2026

    Hi all—Working on a follow-up on my investigation with @pablofindsout on Life Surge, the org that Tim Tebow paused his relationship with. Looking for current or recent (last 6 mos) students of SurgeU or attendees of Life Surge 3-day classes. DM me or https://t.co/KJF88xW1NR

    57357133165K viewsView on X
  • Sep 1, 2026

    Republicans think Kentucky voters are dumb, and they aren’t even trying to hide it. Here’s @JamesComer calling his constituents “village idiots” and admitting he’ll only hold town halls for people who pay him. https://t.co/p3kg0IgMW5

    3731263710173K viewsView on X
  • Sep 29, 2026

    For their next distractions, the GOP Senate should hold hearings with Hunter Biden and Hillary Clinton. We need a greatest hits album.

    27025705.2K viewsView on X
  • Aug 26, 2026

    Read my latest in @zeteo_news! EXCLUSIVE: The Right’s ‘War on Woke’ Is a Cash Grab on State Treasuries Derek Kreifels led a decade-long crusade against ‘woke’ corporations. Now, he’s getting state business for his Christian finance firm... https://t.co/Kup86GWliY

    1409110594K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#esg

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 546 interactions against 232K followers, an engagement rate of 0.235%. Measured over 15 original posts, its engagement rate beats 74% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 21K times each, and 2.61% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 9.02% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.1 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 43% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 15 posts sampled, 40% carry an image or video and 20% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 53K interactions, about 97x its own typical post.

What is Lauren Windsor's engagement rate on X?
Lauren Windsor (@lawindsor) has an engagement rate of 0.235%, based on the median interactions across 15 original posts from the last 30 days against 232,094 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.235%, Lauren Windsor sits above the 50th percentile of the 213,381 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @lawindsor have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 74% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @lawindsor post?
Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 3.1 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going