Back to @lavecinarubia's profile

La Vecina Rubia engagement report

@lavecinarubia - 950K followers on X

Measured over 34 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 16, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.015%
of 950K followers
Per impression
0.598%
23K views on a typical post
Reach
2.46%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
140
interactions (median)
Saved
0.004%
1 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.8/day
active 77% of days
Peak time
05:00 UTC
Thursday

A typical post picks up 140 interactions against 950K followers, an engagement rate of 0.015%. Measured over 34 original posts, its engagement rate beats 39% of 19,932 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 23K times each, and 0.598% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.46% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.8 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 77% of days. Most posts go out around 05:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 34 posts sampled, 12% carry an image or video and 68% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 26K interactions, about 189x its own typical post.

Measured over 34 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 16, 2026. Recurring tag: #elhombreideal.

Compared with accounts its own size

La Vecina Rubia's engagement rate beats 39% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (19,932 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 35% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.015%, La Vecina Rubia sits above the 10th percentile of the 200,870 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.024%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.141%
p750.671%
p902.53%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 200,870 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,897 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.141%
75th percentile0.671%
90th percentile2.53%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 05:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 05:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 05:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Thursday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Thursday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video12% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link68% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 12% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 68% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 130 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Aug 11, 2026189x their median

    Acabo de leer que en el intermedio del eclipse actúa Shakira.

    23K3.1K122123711K viewsView on X
  • Aug 19, 2026128x their median

    We just crossed a line in medicine that humanity has been walking toward for a hundred years. For the first time, doctors can take a biopsy of your specific tumor, read its unique DNA mutations — the exact fingerprint no other cancer on earth shares — and build a custom mRNA blueprint written for one human being. Yours. It doesn't poison the cancer. It teaches your own immune system what to hunt. And this week, Phase 3 results confirmed it works. Added to the best immunotherapy we already had, this individualized cancer vaccine has been dramatically cutting the odds that high-risk melanoma comes back. In the earlier data, the combination reduced the risk of recurrence or death by 49%, and the risk of the cancer spreading to distant organs by 62%, compared to the standard treatment alone. This week's Phase 3 readout confirmed the benefit holds. That is not a modest tweak. That is a different trajectory for a human life. And melanoma is just the first door. The same approach is now in trials across lung, bladder, and kidney cancers — a whole program of them, racing forward. Understand what this actually means, because it's bigger than one drug. For all of history, we fought cancer with blunt weapons. Cut it out. Burn it with radiation. Flood the whole body with chemotherapy and hope the cancer dies before the patient suffers too much. We were swinging a hammer in the dark. This is a blueprint. A weapon designed atom by atom for one person's disease, that turns their own body into the thing that finds and destroys it. We are watching medicine shift from managing cancer to hunting it. I've spent my life as a physician, and I did not expect to see this so soon. We were told personalized cancer vaccines were a thirty-year dream. They are happening right now, in real patients, with real data, in our lifetime. I don't say this lightly, and I say it as a doctor who knows exactly how rare these moments are: this is one of the most hopeful things to happen in the history of the field. I woke up thinking of the words of the morning prayer — Modeh Ani — I thank You. Gratitude, the moment you open your eyes, for a soul returned and a day given. To be alive at the exact hour when human beings learned to teach the body to cure itself feels like standing inside that prayer. We are not at the end of cancer. But we are, unmistakably, at the beginning of the end of its reign.

    14K3.1K313275823K viewsView on X
  • Aug 10, 202692x their median

    Hi everyone as you probably know, there was recently an earthquake in Colombia. This is a thread of posts offering and asking for help regarding this terrible tragedy—please share and feel free to share more links!🇨🇴🇨🇴🇨🇴 https://t.co/2We7Wo8plQ

    7.2K5.5K18115215K viewsView on X
  • Aug 3, 202652x their median

    Si dices que te gusta leer pero solo lo haces antes de acostarte, en el transporte público, en verano en la playa, u otras circunstancias donde no tienes nada mejor que hacer, perdona pero no te gusta leer.

    2.6K1031.7K3.0K2.2M viewsView on X
  • Aug 12, 202651x their median

    NI SE OS OCURRA MIRAR EL ECLIPSE. MAL ROLLO. MALAS CONSECUENCIAS.

    4.1K9589941.1K3.0M viewsView on X
  • Aug 11, 202628x their median

    Creo que el eclipse es el claro ejemplo de que la sobreinformación genera desinformación y rechazo. 🌝

    3.5K3814418138K viewsView on X
  • Oct 8, 202628x their median

    Pongamos de nuevo de moda la humanidad y la empatía. 🩷

    3.3K561331745K viewsView on X
  • Oct 7, 202628x their median

    Comparto esto en Instagram y recibo estos mensajes, además de miles de seguidores menos en minutos. Prefiero perder seguidores antes que mis principios y valores por mantener seguidores. 🩷 https://t.co/WDGdOr2yqT

    3.5K229114572K viewsView on X
  • Aug 13, 202624x their median

    «El cuento del eclipse». 😂😂😂😂😂 https://t.co/Tp30qhvqit

    2.9K22315725115K viewsView on X
  • Aug 10, 202623x their median

    Me está dando miedo mirar el eclipse incluso con gafas homologadas y de todo. ¿Alguien más así? 🥹

    2.7K14838048388K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#elhombreideal

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 140 interactions against 950K followers, an engagement rate of 0.015%. Measured over 34 original posts, its engagement rate beats 39% of 19,932 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 23K times each, and 0.598% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.46% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.8 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 77% of days. Most posts go out around 05:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 34 posts sampled, 12% carry an image or video and 68% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 26K interactions, about 189x its own typical post.

What is La Vecina Rubia's engagement rate on X?
La Vecina Rubia (@lavecinarubia) has an engagement rate of 0.015%, based on the median interactions across 34 original posts from the last 30 days against 949,537 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.015%, La Vecina Rubia sits above the 10th percentile of the 200,870 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @lavecinarubia have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 39% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (19,932 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @lavecinarubia post?
Most posts go out around 05:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.8 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going