Back to @lasillavacia's profile

La Silla Vacía engagement report

@lasillavacia - 1.4M followers on X

Measured over 756 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 23, 2026.

Engagement

Bottom quarter for its size
Per follower
0.001%
of 1.4M followers
Per impression
0.489%
3.9K views on a typical post
Reach
0.28%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
19
interactions (median)
Saved
0.026%
1 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
32.23/day
active 103% of days
Peak time
20:00 UTC
Wednesday

A typical post picks up 19 interactions against 1.4M followers, an engagement rate of 0.001%. Measured over 756 original posts, its engagement rate beats 14% of 19,932 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 3.9K times each, and 0.489% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.284% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 32.2 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 20:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 756 posts sampled, 20% carry an image or video and 91% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 8.2K interactions, about 429x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #lasillaenvivo, #reddeexpertos, #huevosconpolítica.

Measured over 756 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 23, 2026. Recurring tags: #lasillaenvivo, #reddeexpertos, #huevosconpolítica.

Compared with accounts its own size

La Silla Vacía's engagement rate beats 14% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (19,932 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 31% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.001%, La Silla Vacía sits below the 10th percentile of the 200,661 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.024%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.141%
p750.67%
p902.53%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 200,661 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,898 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.141%
75th percentile0.67%
90th percentile2.53%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 20:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 20:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 20:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Wednesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Wednesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video20% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link91% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 20% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 91% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 274 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Aug 18, 2026429x their median

    ❤️ Feliz aniversario, amore mio. 17 años de casados, 18 años y medio caminando juntos. Celebramos con un gran concierto, como te gusta: el maestro Juan Luis Guerra, ídolo eterno. Gracias por ser la luz que ilumina mi camino, por ser la risa en medio... https://t.co/cFe2d2NUhc

    7.1K65533953490K viewsView on X
  • Sep 14, 2026339x their median

    #LaSillaEnVivo | Dos periodistas fueron hasta donde fue abatido "Bendito Menor" y expusieron dudas sobre la versión oficial: 🔴No había evidencia de enfrentamiento. 🔴Habrían respondido con 3 armas. 🔴La policía se llevó las cámaras de la zona. https://t.co/t1GsK8Z1nT

    4.4K1.6K43191190K viewsView on X
  • Aug 23, 2026317x their median

    #Investigación El @CNE_Colombia gastó $529 mil millones para capacitar y acreditar testigos de las elecciones 2026. El despilfarro creció en segunda vuelta. La Silla Vacía encontró que hay decenas de miles de millones que no aparecen justificados. https://t.co/O6oyVr1kzU

    3.2K2.6K13292299K viewsView on X
  • Aug 22, 2026290x their median

    #LaSillaAmazonía revisó los posibles hallazgos del balance del sector ambiente del "Libro de la Verdad" y encontró que les hizo falta contexto. En general, no hay grandes denuncias de corrupción y algunos datos son erróneos. https://t.co/p7GrIEDccL

    3.8K1.5K13588110K viewsView on X
  • Aug 25, 2026284x their median

    En cuatro años, el #DetectorDeMentiras🔎 verificó a @petrogustavo en 159 ocasiones. En al menos 126, encontramos falsedades, engaños o afirmaciones debatibles. ¿Sobre qué mentía? ¿Para qué? 🔴 En este especial reconstruimos su manual de desinformación: https://t.co/dGyZ3ZZuun

    3.4K1.7K119126228K viewsView on X
  • Aug 23, 2026255x their median

    #LaSillaAmazonía Uno de los datos más alarmantes del Libro de la Verdad sobre MinAmbiente fue un supuesto crecimiento de OPS de casi el 800% entre 2022 y 2025, pero La Silla encontró que el aumento es más cercano al 25%. https://t.co/p7GrIEDccL

    3.5K1.2K11679522K viewsView on X
  • Oct 7, 2026214x their median

    #LaSillaEnVivo | Ana Lucía Pineda defendió su viaje a la Semana de la Moda de París, cuestionado por la oposición, para exponer un proyecto de talentos nacionales. 🗣️Dijo que lo pagó con sus recursos. "Puedo ir a donde quiera en el mundo con mi plata". https://t.co/2Np467wmWD

    2.9K5385469984K viewsView on X
  • Sep 25, 2026203x their median

    #DetectorDeMentiras🔎 @Danielbricen y @CarolBordaA proponen eliminar el impuesto saludable por falta de evidencia y la afectación del 67% de tenderos. Engañoso🟠. Estudios internacionales sugieren endurecer medidas y no hay cifras oficiales de cierres. https://t.co/XqRoMzBWnq

    2.8K943652647K viewsView on X
  • Aug 21, 2026194x their median

    💼El gobierno de De la Espriella se vendió como el de los que "nunca han mamado de la teta del Estado". 📄La Silla Vacía analizó los mas de 270 nombramientos de sus dos primeras semanas: es un gobierno de políticos y empresarios, con muchos repitentes. Va 🧵 https://t.co/qLrYbbfvZh

    2.5K1.1K534680K viewsView on X
  • Aug 27, 2026193x their median

    La desinformación de @petrogustavo en el gobierno no fue aleatoria . La usó para respaldar o impulsar decisiones de su gobierno, defender su gestión, atacar a sus adversarios y cuestionar instituciones. Así funcionó su manual de desinformación 👇: https://t.co/dGyZ3ZZuun

    2.4K1.2K374047K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#lasillaenvivo#reddeexpertos#huevosconpolítica#lasillaamazonía#opinión

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 19 interactions against 1.4M followers, an engagement rate of 0.001%. Measured over 756 original posts, its engagement rate beats 14% of 19,932 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 3.9K times each, and 0.489% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.284% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 32.2 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 20:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 756 posts sampled, 20% carry an image or video and 91% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 8.2K interactions, about 429x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #lasillaenvivo, #reddeexpertos, #huevosconpolítica.

What is La Silla Vacía's engagement rate on X?
La Silla Vacía (@lasillavacia) has an engagement rate of 0.001%, based on the median interactions across 756 original posts from the last 30 days against 1,364,842 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.001%, La Silla Vacía sits below the 10th percentile of the 200,661 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @lasillavacia have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 14% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (19,932 accounts), which puts it in the bottom quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @lasillavacia post?
Most posts go out around 20:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 32.23 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going