Back to @larryelder's profile

Larry Elder engagement report

@larryelder - 1.8M followers on X

Measured over 113 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 28, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.026%
of 1.8M followers
Per impression
1.99%
24K views on a typical post
Reach
1.29%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
468
interactions (median)
Saved
0.034%
8 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
4.6/day
active 100% of days
Peak time
13:00 UTC
Tuesday

A typical post picks up 468 interactions against 1.8M followers, an engagement rate of 0.026%. Measured over 113 original posts, its engagement rate beats 48% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 24K times each, and 1.99% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.29% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 4.6 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 113 posts sampled, 79% carry an image or video and 20% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 75K interactions, about 161x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #gazagrift, #neverforget, #ripfrance.

Measured over 113 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 28, 2026. Recurring tags: #gazagrift, #neverforget, #ripfrance.

Compared with accounts its own size

Larry Elder's engagement rate beats 48% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 66% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.026%, Larry Elder sits above the 25th percentile of the 212,270 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.025% to 0.146%.

p100.004%
p250.025%
p50 (median)0.146%
p750.695%
p902.61%
p9983.1%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 212,270 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,455 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.025%
50th percentile0.146%
75th percentile0.695%
90th percentile2.61%
99th percentile83.1%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 13:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 13:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 13:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Tuesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Tuesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video79% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link20% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 79% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 20% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 331 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 19, 2026161x their median

    Well that's not good... https://t.co/FZ67o7e4Hi

    65K9.1K8218061.6M viewsView on X
  • Sep 14, 2026160x their median

    “Islam has problems with dogs. With women. With music. With gays. With Jews. With Christians. With blood. With pork. With alcohol. With gambling. With interest. “But if you have a problem with Islam, you're a racist, bigoted Islamophobe.” —@t_woelfer (translated from German)

    60K15K711304544K viewsView on X
  • Oct 20, 2026119x their median

    Woman says she was “brainwashed for the first 30 years of my life.” After seeing the France riots, she’s awake “Unfortunately, being a stark Lefty my whole life. All I used to do was scream, open the borders, free the refugees. But when you import the third world, you get the third world What's happening in France and Milan — If you don't draw the parallels and see what is happening at this point, you are absolutely brainwashed. And don't worry, I was brainwashed too. I was brainwashed for the first probably 30 years of my life, and now I've come to realize that that was all part of the plan as well. Prey on the empathy and kindness of those that care, give them a cause to fight for, and then everything else blindly goes out the window” “But luckily I've woken up, and you really need to start questioning yourself and your empathy and who is co-opting your empathy. Who is taking it for their own regime - the world being mad at the moment was predicted and is by design” I just want to say one thing, Isn’t it interesting how when you see people talk like this, that say they’ve “woken up,” it’s ALWAYS a Leftist realizing they were wrong and turning to the Right It is literally never the other way around The Left is brainwashed and has their empathy weaponized to destroy themselves

    41K13K1.3K671704K viewsView on X
  • Sep 19, 2026112x their median

    Jake Tapper devoted his show virtually every night for two years to covering and spreading the Russia hoax. Then Tapper actually had the nerve to tell JD Vance that he didn't spread the Russia hoax. CNN and the people on that clown network should not ever be taken seriously. https://t.co/lU8XlNM9It

    40K11K894480703K viewsView on X
  • Aug 30, 2026106x their median

    Piker: "It’s laughable to say guys like myself, guys like Abdul El-Sayed, we hate America." Also Piker: "I hate America." https://t.co/AuK8FV1leX

    40K8.4K8806597.9M viewsView on X
  • Sep 27, 2026106x their median

    OMG 🚨 UK TV Host GOES OFF on UK Defense Secretary for refusing to connect illegal mass migration with security risks in the UK. This might one of the best on air TV rants you will ever see. After 5 Muslims tried blowing up RAF Air Force base in London. The people in Europe are FED UP with immigration and their failed government that protects illegals over its citizens. https://t.co/0kR6d2jG1p

    38K9.5K1.5K7531.6M viewsView on X
  • Aug 31, 202678x their median

    “Did you know when Muslims start a war they call it Jihad’. When they start losing they call it ‘genocide’? Start as warriors. Finish as victims. Every time. Funny how that works.” —@WoundedTiger__

    30K6.0K42684197K viewsView on X
  • Oct 7, 202661x their median

    “I love Venn diagrams. I really do. I love Venn diagrams. It’s just something about those three circles and the analysis about where there is the intersection, right?” —Kamala Harris, October 28, 2022 https://t.co/6QyRi7Zrlv

    21K7.2K374259199K viewsView on X
  • Aug 28, 202655x their median

    🚨 https://t.co/DX6ohgJJ8y

    21K3.3K8494612.2M viewsView on X
  • Oct 12, 202654x their median

    The pre-dawn raid of Ilhan Omar is part of an immigration fraud investigation into documents filled out when she came into the United States. When Liz Collin of Alpha News last came on the show, she explained that her parents may have lied about her age to fraudulently get her citizenship. Ilhan has always claimed she came to America as a 'child' and was naturalized as a minor at 17 — but new documents show she may have been 18. That is really important because as an adult Illhan would have to apply for citizenship herself and not be waved in as a minor dependent of her war criminal father. "Omar has repeatedly claimed that she became a citizen at the age of 17. But based on public records, Omar was actually 18 in the year 2000, when her father became eligible to apply for citizenship." "Just two days later, her congressional staff contacted the Minnesota Legislative Reference Library, this is back in 2019, to change the Congresswoman's date of birth from October 4th, 1981 to October 4th, 1982." "Omar would not have been a minor when her father applied to be a citizen. So you have Representative Omar changing her birth year." Public records indicate Omar was 18 when she immigrated to the U.S., which would have made her ineligible to enter as a minor under her father. Illhan Omar may have committed immigration fraud to become a legal American Citizen. If the DOJ and DHS proves this, it would be massive. https://t.co/94J4vREeev

    20K4.0K464123597K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#gazagrift#neverforget#ripfrance#vivelafrance

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 468 interactions against 1.8M followers, an engagement rate of 0.026%. Measured over 113 original posts, its engagement rate beats 48% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 24K times each, and 1.99% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.29% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 4.6 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 113 posts sampled, 79% carry an image or video and 20% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 75K interactions, about 161x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #gazagrift, #neverforget, #ripfrance.

What is Larry Elder's engagement rate on X?
Larry Elder (@larryelder) has an engagement rate of 0.026%, based on the median interactions across 113 original posts from the last 30 days against 1,830,260 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.026%, Larry Elder sits above the 25th percentile of the 212,270 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @larryelder have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 48% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @larryelder post?
Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 4.6 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going