Back to @lala's profile

LA LA engagement report

@lala - 3.9M followers on X

Measured over 1 original post from a 30-day window, last computed on August 26, 2026.

Engagement

Bottom quarter for its size
Per follower
0.003%
of 3.9M followers
Per impression
0.453%
22K views on a typical post
Reach
0.58%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
101
interactions (median)
Saved
0.022%
5 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.07/day
active 3% of days
Peak time
17:00 UTC
Tuesday

Early reading. We have captured 1 original post for this account, below the 8 we require before treating a median as settled. The numbers above describe what we have seen so far, not a finished profile of the account.

A typical post picks up 101 interactions against 3.9M followers, an engagement rate of 0.003%. Measured over 1 original post, its engagement rate beats 21% of tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 22K times each, and 0.453% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.578% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.07 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 3% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 1 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 93K interactions, about 918x its own typical post. Only 1 original post have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

Measured over 1 original post from a 30-day window, last computed on August 26, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

LA LA's engagement rate beats 21% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count. A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.003%, LA LA sits below the 10th percentile of the 212,482 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.025%.

p100.004%
p250.025%
p50 (median)0.146%
p750.696%
p902.61%
p9982.9%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 212,482 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,403 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.025%
50th percentile0.146%
75th percentile0.696%
90th percentile2.61%
99th percentile82.9%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 17:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 17:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 17:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Tuesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Tuesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video100% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 100% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 248 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • May 7, 2024918x their median

    Her ability to flow in and out of Spanish/English so that he could answer her questions fully/comfortably and she can fill in the gaps for the audience watching the broadcast>>> A hostess!

    86K6.7K1712844.1M viewsView on X
  • Nov 15, 202496x their median

    Congratulations Kiyan!!!! Wow. You were pretty much a toddler when I met you. 😩 so happy for Carmelo & Lala ♥️

    8.9K7068361.5M viewsView on X
  • Mar 19, 202340x their median

    https://t.co/Btjfbbgpvg RT https://t.co/zlYn8jza4g

    3.7K18211232413K viewsView on X
  • May 1, 202439x their median

    Step into your imagination. Introducing Icons https://t.co/KOpkZ91UbT

    3.2K3491482631.4M viewsView on X
  • Jan 31, 202331x their median

    YOU PEOPLE is the #1 movie in 73 countries😱😱😱😱😱I’m so happy you enjoyed it!!! WOOOOOOWWWW https://t.co/x0A2DW3hXf

    2.8K2108658464K viewsView on X
  • Mar 18, 202325x their median

    https://t.co/Btjfbbgpvg RT https://t.co/XMUWWUNijs

    2.3K1266212325K viewsView on X
  • May 2, 202321x their median

    Matte Mondays in May with @MACcosmetics 💄❤️... @RokaelBeauty with the magic touch for #metgala #macpartne https://t.co/baDTFdil29

    1.6K22723223763K viewsView on X
  • Jan 18, 20248.9x their median

    Super excited to welcome YOU to La La Land on @airbnb. I created La La Land down in Fort Lauderdale, Florida as the perfect getaway for some fun in the sun, girls trips, bachelorette & birthday trips. I designed the entire place from the art on the wall, down to the sheets you lay in!! So many great places to take pictures, do fun content, and just have the perfect trip that we all need. I can’t wait to see you there!! You truly get to experience travel my way!! Bookings open January 24 at 1pm ET here: https://t.co/sFjDJ0plBq

    6891061009365K viewsView on X
  • Mar 17, 20238.9x their median

    ALL COLORS! The MEA CULPA X LA LA COLLAB ❤️‍🔥❤️‍🔥❤️‍🔥 https://t.co/Btjfbbgpvg grab them before they SELL OUT!! RT https://t.co/YOcerbNzWm

    81854189176K viewsView on X
  • Mar 20, 20248.6x their median

    Team Markeisha or Team Lawanda?? RT @bmfstarz https://t.co/mUibnaX5M0

    712687815382K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 101 interactions against 3.9M followers, an engagement rate of 0.003%. Measured over 1 original post, its engagement rate beats 21% of tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 22K times each, and 0.453% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.578% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.07 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 3% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 1 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 93K interactions, about 918x its own typical post. Only 1 original post have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

What is LA LA's engagement rate on X?
LA LA (@lala) has an engagement rate of 0.003%, based on the median interactions across 1 original posts from the last 30 days against 3,860,443 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.003%, LA LA sits below the 10th percentile of the 212,482 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @lala have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 21% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count, which puts it in the bottom quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @lala post?
Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.07 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going