Back to @lakeyah's profile

BIG KEY 🔑 engagement report

@lakeyah - 616K followers on X

Measured over 39 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 7, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.09%
of 616K followers
Per impression
2.40%
23K views on a typical post
Reach
3.76%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
555
interactions (median)
Saved
0.134%
31 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
2.63/day
active 53% of days
Peak time
00:00 UTC
Friday

A typical post picks up 555 interactions against 616K followers, an engagement rate of 0.09%. Measured over 39 original posts, its engagement rate beats 69% of 19,932 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 23K times each, and 2.40% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.76% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.6 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 53% of days. Most posts go out around 00:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 39 posts sampled, 10% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 79K interactions, about 142x its own typical post.

Measured over 39 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 7, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

BIG KEY 🔑's engagement rate beats 69% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (19,932 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 72% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.09%, BIG KEY 🔑 sits above the 25th percentile of the 201,555 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.142%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.142%
p750.671%
p902.53%
p9982.5%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 201,555 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,929 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.142%
75th percentile0.671%
90th percentile2.53%
99th percentile82.5%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 00:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 00:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 00:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Friday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Friday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video10% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--8%-9% to -7%41K
  • 10% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 61 characters, which falls in the under 80 characters band. Across the catalog, posts under 80 characters run 8% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 11, 2026142x their median

    I keep getting sexier and it’s starting to scare me https://t.co/SVTUhJs8Yo

    63K15K1157651.1M viewsView on X
  • Aug 18, 2026131x their median

    I’ll mop the house with a q-tip before I ask a nigga why her and not me

    63K9.9K84278652K viewsView on X
  • Aug 21, 2026104x their median

    BITCH SHE IS INSANE?????? https://t.co/AIup2mj83I

    54K3.3K46114427K viewsView on X
  • Sep 28, 202640x their median

    Having a baby daddy would ruin my aura man, I know that for sure.

    17K5.0K63293350K viewsView on X
  • Sep 1, 202624x their median

    no let ups https://t.co/NxhK0wIlmN

    13K6626870221K viewsView on X
  • Aug 21, 202621x their median

    Bitch stfu https://t.co/wo2zVSSudf

    8.5K3.1K57297236K viewsView on X
  • Aug 27, 202621x their median

    MY CORE FOUR PLATE. THIS IS ALL I EVER WANTED! https://t.co/BMsy31vtgT

    10K1.4K40113159K viewsView on X
  • Sep 1, 202621x their median

    i was made to be spoiled and loved endlessly

    8.3K3.2K995123K viewsView on X
  • Aug 15, 202620x their median

    I been layin low getting thick as hell

    7.7K3.3K26268337K viewsView on X
  • Oct 2, 202616x their median

    I SUCK at fighting for a relationship, soon as I find out you entertaining another bitch.. I leave 😂 I must live on.

    6.5K2.2K50266170K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 555 interactions against 616K followers, an engagement rate of 0.09%. Measured over 39 original posts, its engagement rate beats 69% of 19,932 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 23K times each, and 2.40% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.76% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.6 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 53% of days. Most posts go out around 00:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 39 posts sampled, 10% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 79K interactions, about 142x its own typical post.

What is BIG KEY 🔑's engagement rate on X?
BIG KEY 🔑 (@lakeyah) has an engagement rate of 0.09%, based on the median interactions across 39 original posts from the last 30 days against 615,506 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.09%, BIG KEY 🔑 sits above the 25th percentile of the 201,555 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @lakeyah have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 69% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (19,932 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @lakeyah post?
Most posts go out around 00:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.63 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going