Back to @kylenabecker's profile

Kyle Becker engagement report

@kylenabecker - 682K followers on X

Measured over 51 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 3, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.013%
of 682K followers
Per impression
0.856%
10K views on a typical post
Reach
1.47%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
86
interactions (median)
Saved
0.02%
2 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
3.87/day
active 30% of days
Peak time
00:00 UTC
Thursday

A typical post picks up 86 interactions against 682K followers, an engagement rate of 0.013%. Measured over 51 original posts, its engagement rate beats 37% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 10K times each, and 0.856% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.47% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.9 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 30% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 00:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 51 posts sampled, 16% carry an image or video, 6% are part of a thread and 84% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 11K interactions, about 130x its own typical post.

Measured over 51 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 3, 2026. Recurring tag: #fallontonight.

Compared with accounts its own size

Kyle Becker's engagement rate beats 37% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 43% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.013%, Kyle Becker sits above the 10th percentile of the 204,880 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.024%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 204,880 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,891 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 00:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 00:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 00:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Thursday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Thursday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video16% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link84% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 16% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 84% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 154 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 11, 2026130x their median

    🚨Report: North Carolina Democrats have withdrawn support for State House candidate Shelly Headen after she called for violence against Republicans and compared herself to Jesus Christ She said: “I think our only hope is an attack on US soil, preferably Alabama, Louisiana where the stupid people live.” She said: “I’ve sacrificed myself just like Jesus sacrificed himself on the cross, and Martin Luther King and Abraham Lincoln and all the people that put themselves out there to sacrifice for our country,” she said. “If a few angry moments on social media are the end, then so be it. MAGA will keep winning if we continue with not standing up for what’s right.”

    6.7K2.9K1.2K415249K viewsView on X
  • Sep 1, 202672x their median

    Three Mile Island produced zero deaths, a chest X-ray dose, and a 30 freeze on new American reactors. A stuck valve and a misread gauge caused a partial meltdown on March 28, 1979. “The China Syndrome”, a movie about a cover up at a nuclear plant, released in theaters 12 days earlier, so newsrooms had a field day with this one. While Thornburgh advised pregnant women and small children only inside a five mile radius, national coverage turned it into a regional evacuation. Panic eased when Carter walked the control room 4 days later, but the damage was done. Columbia’s 1990 study of 32,000 nearby residents found no significant cancer increase. Nuclear stayed one of the safest energy sources ever measured. But the movie and the headlines didn’t allow a return to normalcy.

    5.3K631191834.5M viewsView on X
  • Aug 31, 202665x their median

    The NFL needs to stop with the Woke messages. Trump asked for it. Even Bill Maher agrees with it. Enough is enough. Football is about football. Leave us alone with your dumb politics. https://t.co/n8nxad2ONK

    4.9K618852281K viewsView on X
  • Aug 24, 202648x their median

    The Trump administration is proposing a new six-figure fee for H-1B visas that would apply to most new applicants, not just those applying from abroad, replacing an earlier plan to charge $100,000 for the visa that was struck down by the courts https://t.co/S8e0Ptwl3x

    3.5K274303974.1M viewsView on X
  • Sep 30, 202641x their median

    Curb Your Super Intelligence https://t.co/KrnOxzDPuN

    3.1K18818551333K viewsView on X
  • Sep 11, 202633x their median

    The New York Times is having a real one today. It takes some balls to complain about "Islamophobia" on 9/11. Hey, @nytimes — were the 3,000 people who died also "Islamophobic"? https://t.co/mDHLHUhgDi

    2.0K671831915K viewsView on X
  • Sep 1, 202626x their median

    If “aesthetic injury” is grounds to stop the White House ballroom, why did these people never demand we tear down the hideous Department of Health building? https://t.co/CzenPosujb

    2.0K1711241688K viewsView on X
  • Aug 21, 202617x their median

    Critics say I shouldn't run for the Senate because I'm not a politician. You know what I say? Guilty as charged. https://t.co/LhRTXdjxLK

    1.1K1492443147K viewsView on X
  • Sep 11, 202612x their median

    Hochul Grants Last-Minute Pardon to Violent Criminal Alien Rather Than Lose in Supreme Court https://t.co/c93hvrZBZd

    610339351312K viewsView on X
  • Aug 31, 202611x their median

    We can't say for sure, but the latest Fauci document dump includes evidence that Ralph Baric's coronavirus engineering research with the Wuhan lab was blessed by the CIA.  That may sound conspiratorial, but consider: - Baric serves on an advisory group to U.S. intel called the Biological Sciences Experts Group.  - In Sept. 2015 the CIA commissioned a paper on how a bioterrorist might engineer the coronavirus MERS into a pandemic virus via the BSEG. - As a member of the BSEG and the world's top expert (the "big cheese" in coronaviruses, as one colleague called him) Baric would be the natural choice for this project.  - Baric published a paper three months earlier with Wuhan's Shi Zhengli on this subject. - The classified paper on MERS was approved by "NCPC": the National Counterproliferation and Biosecurity Center. I reported last year that this center adamantly opposed the lab leak theory. After my reporting, Tulsi Gabbard shut it down. I didn't include this in my report, but I heard one official burst into tears when presented with evidence for a lab leak.

    642207372425K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#fallontonight

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 86 interactions against 682K followers, an engagement rate of 0.013%. Measured over 51 original posts, its engagement rate beats 37% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 10K times each, and 0.856% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.47% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.9 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 30% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 00:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 51 posts sampled, 16% carry an image or video, 6% are part of a thread and 84% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 11K interactions, about 130x its own typical post.

What is Kyle Becker's engagement rate on X?
Kyle Becker (@kylenabecker) has an engagement rate of 0.013%, based on the median interactions across 51 original posts from the last 30 days against 682,308 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.013%, Kyle Becker sits above the 10th percentile of the 204,880 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @kylenabecker have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 37% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @kylenabecker post?
Most posts go out around 00:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day, at roughly 3.87 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going