Back to @kurt13warner's profile

Kurt Warner engagement report

@kurt13warner - 615K followers on X

Measured over 45 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 7, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.034%
of 615K followers
Per impression
0.839%
25K views on a typical post
Reach
3.99%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
206
interactions (median)
Saved
0.016%
4 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
4.43/day
active 60% of days
Peak time
00:00 UTC
Monday

A typical post picks up 206 interactions against 615K followers, an engagement rate of 0.034%. Measured over 45 original posts, its engagement rate beats 52% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 25K times each, and 0.839% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.99% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 4.4 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 60% of days. Most posts go out around 00:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 45 posts sampled, 20% carry an image or video, 16% are part of a thread and 20% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 4.3K interactions, about 21x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #studyball, #kevinharlan, #raidernation.

Measured over 45 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 7, 2026. Recurring tags: #studyball, #kevinharlan, #raidernation.

Compared with accounts its own size

Kurt Warner's engagement rate beats 52% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 43% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.034%, Kurt Warner sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,048 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.143%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,048 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,894 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 00:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 00:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 00:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Monday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Monday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video20% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link20% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 20% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 20% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 281 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 29, 202621x their median

    How important is your backup QB? We’ve seen 5 starting QBs get hurt in game & we’ve had 5 backups coming in and win their next game (Lock, Mariota, Winston, Wentz & Keenum)!!! Everyone felt the “sky was falling” & they have calmed the waters!! Congrats to all of them!

    4.0K200681184K viewsView on X
  • Sep 28, 202616x their median

    Let’s Me hear it #RaidersNation - I wasn’t a believer this am, but you all are starting to convince me & I’m here for it! Man, I love this game and this league!

    2.9K154159862K viewsView on X
  • Oct 5, 202615x their median

    I know there are a bunch of really smart ppl in the Chargers building, but the tape is leaving me befuddled conceptually! It almost feels like they are trying things bc #Herbert is a freak and they think he can do things others can’t, but it makes little sense! Yes, I felt Herbert was uncomfortable earlier in year & missed some OPPs being tentative, yesterday, he had a couple bad INTs, but so many concepts left me uncomfortable for him watching the tape!

    2.8K19510736603K viewsView on X
  • Aug 23, 202612x their median

    Saw @BrendaSong calling a @RamsNFL game today & brought back memories of being on the #SuiteLife when I was a Ram… I took the kids and was told by one of them “it was the best day ever”!!! So many crazy, fun moments in this crazy, fun life of mine!

    2.3K9135365K viewsView on X
  • Aug 21, 202612x their median

    We have got to do a better job of teaching QBs to see the defense!!! Too much looking at WRs to see if they are open, instead of letting the defense tell us if they’re open! #DrivingMeCrazy

    2.1K154761879K viewsView on X
  • Aug 23, 202611x their median

    I fully understand how the NFL works but the more preseason I watch the more I would love for someone who’s knows QB to truly evaluate higher drafted guys vs others! I am continually amazed at the # of chances some guys get after showing they struggle to see the game and play the position! The lack of true understanding & vision at backup positions is startling when u get to see it & yet the vet (who’s bounced around) will get every opportunity over a young guy that hasn’t had that opportunity yet! I’m not saying guys can’t grow and get better, no better case than #SamDarnold a year ago, but when I pop on the tape and see exactly what I’ve always seen from these guys it makes me scratch my head trying to figure out what I’m/they are missing? When I was a rookie #DickVermeil had to make a similar dec for his 3rd QB - an older journey man or a young kid that “may” be good - he chose me & gave me that shot… just don’t understand why more teams don’t? Shoot me your thoughts?

    1.8K9529931342K viewsView on X
  • Sep 5, 202610x their median

    Playing QB at the top college programs has to be so much easier than for the rest of the world… just watching the games I have this weekend, so many wide open guys, allowing the margin of error for these guys to be so much larger!! It’s why I LOVE the NFL, the talent level is equal, everyone is good & you have to be able to really play, to play!!

    1.8K15811547223K viewsView on X
  • Sep 6, 202610x their median

    37 years ago #Zackman suffered a #TraumaticBrainInjury & his/our world changed… his impact on me & my perspective towards life cannot be measured! Every day with this young man makes my life better! #HappyZackday https://t.co/UchVxDD12W

    2.1K4742147K viewsView on X
  • Sep 6, 20269.4x their median

    This app can be used for good & I do my best to use it that way… But days like today make me want to walk away… so tired of ppl ripping on others like their job is a piece of cake or taking shots at young men trying to do their job, bc they aren’t perfect, AS IF THEY DO THEIR JOB PERFECTLY EVER!!! Life is tough… sports is tough… perfection is non-existent in either… deal with it like an adult!

    1.7K70169696K viewsView on X
  • Sep 9, 20268.8x their median

    I don’t know who’s up but this @carlosalcaraz #BenShelton match at the @usopen is simply INCREDIBLE!!!! These are the moments in sport that you don’t want to see end, you don’t want to see someone lose & you are in awe of their skill! #Salute to both of them, no matter how it ends!

    1.7K6545127K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#studyball#kevinharlan#raidernation#baldysbreakdowns#benjohnson

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 206 interactions against 615K followers, an engagement rate of 0.034%. Measured over 45 original posts, its engagement rate beats 52% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 25K times each, and 0.839% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.99% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 4.4 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 60% of days. Most posts go out around 00:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 45 posts sampled, 20% carry an image or video, 16% are part of a thread and 20% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 4.3K interactions, about 21x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #studyball, #kevinharlan, #raidernation.

What is Kurt Warner's engagement rate on X?
Kurt Warner (@kurt13warner) has an engagement rate of 0.034%, based on the median interactions across 45 original posts from the last 30 days against 615,348 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.034%, Kurt Warner sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,048 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @kurt13warner have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 52% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @kurt13warner post?
Most posts go out around 00:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 4.43 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going