KJ Crypto engagement report
@koreanjewcrypto - 146K followers on X
Measured over 37 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 26, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 47 interactions against 146K followers, an engagement rate of 0.032%. Measured over 37 original posts, its engagement rate beats 33% of 15,519 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 4.9K times each, and 0.96% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.36% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.1 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 37% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 37 posts sampled, 59% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 4.5K interactions, about 96x its own typical post.
Measured over 37 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 26, 2026.
Compared with accounts its own size
KJ Crypto's engagement rate beats 33% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (15,519 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 7 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 40% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.032%, KJ Crypto sits above the 25th percentile of the 157,515 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.022% to 0.128%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.003% |
| 25th percentile | 0.022% |
| 50th percentile | 0.128% |
| 75th percentile | 0.604% |
| 90th percentile | 2.32% |
| 99th percentile | 83.3% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 15:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 59% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 0% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | -3% | -3% to -2% | 54K |
- 59% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
- Its average post runs 108 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Sep 11, 202696x their median
you’re offered $1M if you last 15 minutes in the octagon with a current male ufc fighter of your choice. Who you stepping in against?
- Sep 17, 20268.0x their median
I confronted @kevinolearytv about his upcoming announcement at the AVAX Summit https://t.co/3EB3KsndHF
- Sep 11, 20266.9x their median
Actually insane, originally down 90%+ from launch Now people realizing it's legit and worth the investment 10x higher soon prayge https://t.co/gxwbx6td7R
- Sep 16, 20262.6x their median
Everyone is asking how I ended up owning the rights to Froge, so here it is from the start 🧵
- Sep 15, 20262.3x their median
In the game of life you can either be the dragon or the car The choice is yours https://t.co/RcddFjIWNe
- Sep 17, 20262.1x their median
Friend bought a new home in an HOA last year and just found out they’re building a data center less than 500 ft from the development Noise, ugly, hoarding electricity and water usage, his home is instantly worth less than what he paid for it Why is this ok? They’re building these things that take our jobs (and possibly end the human race altogether) right on top of us. They’re paying off politicians to do so and it’s only going to get worse Worst of all it this is all happening without any real resistance. Fucked up man
- Sep 15, 20261.9x their median
Can someone explain to me the lore on this one? https://t.co/j6kH3AtMDr
- Sep 12, 20261.7x their median
So I can buy a coin called fag but I’m not allowed to say “gay stonks” in my thesis? wtf is this shit fomo https://t.co/nId0JKuyiN
- Sep 11, 20261.6x their median
THERE IS NO SECOND BEST 0x1dd500201ffabc04089aa1313b0a6aba668ca178 https://t.co/ZdorPpQS9I
- Sep 16, 20261.6x their median
You have to understand that the type of person who buys “dragon fucking cars” coin is not a normal crypto investor and more prone to hodling for ridiculous market caps than others This is not for the mid curvers https://t.co/2tfhJzKR6t
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 47 interactions against 146K followers, an engagement rate of 0.032%. Measured over 37 original posts, its engagement rate beats 33% of 15,519 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 4.9K times each, and 0.96% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.36% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.1 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 37% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 37 posts sampled, 59% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 4.5K interactions, about 96x its own typical post.
- What is KJ Crypto's engagement rate on X?
- KJ Crypto (@koreanjewcrypto) has an engagement rate of 0.032%, based on the median interactions across 37 original posts from the last 30 days against 145,537 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.032%, KJ Crypto sits above the 25th percentile of the 157,515 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @koreanjewcrypto have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 33% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (15,519 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @koreanjewcrypto post?
- Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.13 posts per day across the measured window.