Back to @kimKBaltimore's profile

Kimberly Klacik engagement report

@kimKBaltimore - 600K followers on X

Measured over 22 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 26, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.011%
of 600K followers
Per impression
0.75%
8.5K views on a typical post
Reach
1.42%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
64
interactions (median)
Saved
0.012%
1 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.43/day
active 33% of days
Peak time
13:00 UTC
Tuesday

A typical post picks up 64 interactions against 600K followers, an engagement rate of 0.011%. Measured over 22 original posts, its engagement rate beats 34% of 3,829 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 8.5K times each, and 0.75% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.42% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.4 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 33% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 22 posts sampled, 64% carry an image or video and 64% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 5.0K interactions, about 78x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #clancy, #lindsay, #lindsayclancy.

Measured over 22 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 26, 2026. Recurring tags: #clancy, #lindsay, #lindsayclancy.

Compared with accounts its own size

Kimberly Klacik's engagement rate beats 34% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,829 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 8 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 45% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.011%, Kimberly Klacik sits above the 10th percentile of the 37,071 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.012%.

p100.002%
p250.012%
p50 (median)0.08%
p750.435%
p902.10%
p99158.3%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 37,071 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 105,527 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.012%
50th percentile0.08%
75th percentile0.435%
90th percentile2.10%
99th percentile158.3%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 13:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 13:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 6%Busiest hour: 13:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%51K
01:00 UTC-2%52K
02:00 UTC-3%51K
03:00 UTC-4%54K
04:00 UTC-6%44K
05:00 UTC-4%42K
06:00 UTC-4%49K
07:00 UTC-5%53K
08:00 UTC-4%61K
09:00 UTC-3%71K
10:00 UTC-2%73K
11:00 UTC-3%80K
12:00 UTC-2%88K
13:00 UTC-2%96K
14:00 UTC-4%99K
15:00 UTC-2%103K
16:00 UTC-3%100K
17:00 UTC-2%92K
18:00 UTC-1%86K
19:00 UTC-2%81K
20:00 UTC-1%75K
21:00 UTC-1%67K
22:00 UTC-1%58K
23:00 UTC-1%52K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Tuesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 5%Busiest day: Tuesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%234K
Monday0%294K
Tuesday-3%288K
Wednesday-1%253K
Thursday-2%247K
Friday-3%256K
Saturday+3%230K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Best tweets

  • Aug 10, 202678x their median

    Still Relevant 6 years later... https://t.co/uzcyscRFMZ

    4.1K57327850385K viewsView on X
  • Aug 22, 202647x their median

    Finally caught the sunset 🌅 https://t.co/hNLUKFeAPr

    2.8K57139533K viewsView on X
  • Aug 19, 202633x their median

    Congratulations, @ByronDonalds 👏 I hope Florida elects you in November 🇺🇸 Governor Donalds ✅ https://t.co/dzKALx11Bl

    2.0K9432019K viewsView on X
  • Aug 25, 202614x their median

    It is clear @AbdulElSayed was not ready for @JesseBWatters on @FoxNews. This is embarrassing. Came in armed with talking points. Credit to him for attempting the interview.

    7675649219K viewsView on X
  • Aug 25, 20268.7x their median

    Heartbreaking. Dolly Parton has died ❤️ https://t.co/UXd36dGQZG

    4963223520K viewsView on X
  • Aug 21, 20268.1x their median

    I think someone inside the White House didn’t want Natalie Harp considered for Press Secretary so these gutter rumors started. I also don’t think they know President Trump very well because their efforts may actually increase her chances.

    4623615334K viewsView on X
  • Aug 21, 20262.3x their median

    Against my best judgment, I decided to weigh in on the Lindsay Clancy trial. #Lindsay #Clancy #lindsayclancy #lindsayclancytrial #lindsayclancycase #lindsayclancystory #tiktoktrend https://t.co/GQvkimUL10

    13181009.4K viewsView on X
  • Aug 18, 2026

    NEW: "We do not believe the courts should condone this lawlessness from the Governor and the General Assembly by expanding their power to mislead voters to pass this constitutional amendment by an unconstitutional process," @MarshallYates_ said. 🔗: https://t.co/8uOs9Rhacl https://t.co/YJdhbPVXwd

    61182615K viewsView on X
  • Aug 18, 2026

    As promised on @WCBM680 … here is the new wall (warehouse) going up at Wilson Point. A developer found a “loophole”. Erecting this eyesore without community input. #wcbm680 https://t.co/NUMuBifHWr

    601013013K viewsView on X
  • Aug 25, 2026

    https://t.co/FCzLtSDMoj

    619308.4K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#clancy#lindsay#lindsayclancy#lindsayclancycase#lindsayclancystory

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 64 interactions against 600K followers, an engagement rate of 0.011%. Measured over 22 original posts, its engagement rate beats 34% of 3,829 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 8.5K times each, and 0.75% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.42% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.4 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 33% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 22 posts sampled, 64% carry an image or video and 64% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 5.0K interactions, about 78x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #clancy, #lindsay, #lindsayclancy.

What is Kimberly Klacik's engagement rate on X?
Kimberly Klacik (@kimKBaltimore) has an engagement rate of 0.011%, based on the median interactions across 22 original posts from the last 30 days against 600,038 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.011%, Kimberly Klacik sits above the 10th percentile of the 37,071 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @kimKBaltimore have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 34% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,829 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @kimKBaltimore post?
Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.43 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going

Kimberly Klacik (@kimKBaltimore) Engagement Rate - 0.011% | PlayerSells