Back to @kilmeade's profile

Brian Kilmeade engagement report

@kilmeade - 929K followers on X

Measured over 34 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 19, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.015%
of 929K followers
Per impression
1.20%
12K views on a typical post
Reach
1.27%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
142
interactions (median)
Saved
0.017%
2 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.83/day
active 53% of days
Peak time
15:00 UTC
Monday

A typical post picks up 142 interactions against 929K followers, an engagement rate of 0.015%. Measured over 34 original posts, its engagement rate beats 40% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 12K times each, and 1.20% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.27% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.8 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 53% of days. Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 34 posts sampled, 76% carry an image or video and 47% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 73K interactions, about 512x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #foxnews, #onenationfnc, #briankilmeade.

Measured over 34 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 19, 2026. Recurring tags: #foxnews, #onenationfnc, #briankilmeade.

Compared with accounts its own size

Brian Kilmeade's engagement rate beats 40% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 52% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.015%, Brian Kilmeade sits above the 10th percentile of the 204,880 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.024%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 204,880 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,891 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 15:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 15:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 15:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Monday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Monday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video76% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link47% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 76% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 47% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 147 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Aug 17, 2026512x their median

    Another really amazing pandemic clip. October, 2021. CNN sends a reporter to Miami to investigate a school that is considered "anti-vax." While there the reporter runs into a parent who says that he is not going to have his children get the Covid vaccine. While being harassed by the CNN lackey, the parent says that fully vaccinated people are still dying from Covid and that Fauci is not the best scientist in the world. The CNN clown scoffs at him and tells him he is wrong. This exact same week the former head of the CDC Robert Redfield said that more than 40% of people who died from Covid over the past 6-8 weeks in Maryland were fully vaccinated. Soon after, the CEO of Pfizer said publicly that two doses of the vaccine offered almost no protection at all against Covid. The parent was right. The arrogant CNN reporter was wrong.

    58K13K1.1K6251.5M viewsView on X
  • Aug 1, 2026252x their median

    HOLY SH*T 🚨 Trump’s White House just posted a video of Sen Chuck Schumer demanding Voter IDs PASS THE SAVE AMERICA ACT https://t.co/0abzzOWf2k

    25K9.6K331420831K viewsView on X
  • Aug 11, 2026117x their median

    Keep them coming https://t.co/BpT41hTWys

    13K3.1K416241574K viewsView on X
  • Oct 8, 202691x their median

    This is how I was greeted coming home today https://t.co/wICajC9isy

    12K3026003175K viewsView on X
  • Sep 11, 2023142x their median

    Nearly 3,000 New Yorkers died on 9/11; 22 years later, the death hasn't stopped. We mourn our neighbors who died that day. The hundreds of thousands who died in the wars that followed. The unknown millions injured & displaced. In their memory, we work toward a better world.

    4.3K2505.3K9379.5M viewsView on X
  • Aug 29, 202616x their median

    Bear and Willow are getting ready for One Nation tomorrow night at 10 pm https://t.co/UnUCcpF22D

    2.2K5772326K viewsView on X
  • Oct 18, 202614x their median

    Willow & bear waiting patiently for a long. Walk and One Nation promo opportunity https://t.co/AgSDCCjAyy

    1.9K6361619K viewsView on X
  • Aug 21, 20269.5x their median

    "ECONOMIC D-DAY": Trump launches crushing economic operation against Iran https://t.co/AQwrJ14Wz4

    1.1K15411310138K viewsView on X
  • Sep 10, 20268.3x their median

    Nike exits S&P 100 after nearly two decades https://t.co/DC03fvheUV

    98011777934K viewsView on X
  • Oct 8, 20268.2x their median

    Gutless!! That’s who they are https://t.co/W0lNpWXcG8

    97413546518K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#foxnews#onenationfnc#briankilmeade#unitingthestates#ericzwick

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 142 interactions against 929K followers, an engagement rate of 0.015%. Measured over 34 original posts, its engagement rate beats 40% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 12K times each, and 1.20% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.27% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.8 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 53% of days. Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 34 posts sampled, 76% carry an image or video and 47% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 73K interactions, about 512x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #foxnews, #onenationfnc, #briankilmeade.

What is Brian Kilmeade's engagement rate on X?
Brian Kilmeade (@kilmeade) has an engagement rate of 0.015%, based on the median interactions across 34 original posts from the last 30 days against 929,337 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.015%, Brian Kilmeade sits above the 10th percentile of the 204,880 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @kilmeade have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 40% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @kilmeade post?
Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.83 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going