Back to @kikiq28's profile

๐ค๐ข๐ค๐ข engagement report

@kikiq28 - 170K followers on X

Measured over 20 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 22, 2026.

Engagement

Top 10% for its size
Per follower
3.32%
of 170K followers
Per impression
0.478%
1.2M views on a typical post
Reach
693.3%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
5.6K
interactions (median)
Saved
0.091%
1.1K bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
3/day
active 93% of days
Peak time
11:00 UTC
Wednesday

A typical post picks up 5.6K interactions against 170K followers, an engagement rate of 3.32%. Measured over 20 original posts, its engagement rate beats 99% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 1.2M times each, and 0.478% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 691.3% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 11:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 20 posts sampled, 75% carry an image or video and 5% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 131K interactions, about 23x its own typical post.

Measured over 20 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 22, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

๐ค๐ข๐ค๐ข's engagement rate beats 99% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 25% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 3.32%, ๐ค๐ข๐ค๐ข sits above the 90th percentile of the 205,374 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the top 10% band, which runs 2.55% to 82.4%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,374 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,897 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 11:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 11:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 11:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Wednesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Wednesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video75% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link5% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--8%-9% to -7%41K
  • 75% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 5% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 75 characters, which falls in the under 80 characters band. Across the catalog, posts under 80 characters run 8% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Oct 1, 202623x their median

    ้‡ฃใ‚Šๅ €ใง้‡ฃใ‚Šใ—ใฆใ„ใŸใ‚‰้šฃใซๆฅใŸๅฐๅญฆ็”ŸใŒใ‚‚ใฎใฎๆ•ฐๅˆ†ใงใ€Œใƒ‰ใƒ‘ใ‚ฌใ‚ญใซใฏโ€ฆใฃ๏ผ่€ใˆใ‚‰ใ‚Œใชใ„โ€ฆใฃ๏ผใ€ใจ่จ€ใ„ๅ‡บใ—ใฆ็ฌ‘ใฃใฆใ—ใพใฃใŸ

    122K8.3K482073.3M viewsView on X
  • Oct 11, 202612x their median

    Tiktokใงใฟใคใ‘ใŸ้ชจๆ ผใ‚ฆใ‚งใƒผใƒ–ใฎ9ใ‚ฟใ‚คใƒ—่จบๆ–ญใŒๅ‚่€ƒใซใชใ‚Šใ™ใŽใ‚‹www https://t.co/ikcERdFhyH

    61K4.2K302.3K12M viewsView on X
  • Sep 24, 20269.4x their median

    ๅฏ่ตทใใƒ“ใ‚ธใƒฅใฎๆฆ‚ๅฟตใถใกๅฃŠใ—ใซๆฅใŸๅทๅฃๆ˜ฅๅฅˆ31ๆญณใ€‚ https://t.co/g4L9o7g6Lt

    52K43036328312M viewsView on X
  • Apr 27, 20268.5x their median

    ใƒ‹ใ‚ญใƒ“ใฒใจใคใชใ„่‚Œใ—ใฆใ‚‹ไบบใ‚คใƒฉใคใใช

    46K1.1K1303844.5M viewsView on X
  • Oct 14, 20267.7x their median

    ใ€GRLใ‚ใ‚‹ใ‚ใ‚‹็ฌฌ1ไฝใ€‘ ใŠโ€ผ๏ธโ€ผ๏ธใ“ใฎใƒˆใƒƒใƒ—ใ‚นใ‹ใ‚ใ„ใ„โ€ผ๏ธโ€ผ๏ธใฃใฆๆ€ใฃใŸใ‚‰ใ‚นใ‚ซใƒผใƒˆใ‚’ๅฃฒใฃใฆใ‚‹ใƒšใƒผใ‚ธใ ใฃใŸ

    42K8411103971K viewsView on X
  • May 31, 20266.3x their median

    ใ€ใŠ้ก˜ใ„ใ€‘ ็งใ”ใจใงๆ็ธฎใงใ™ใŒใ€็š†ๆง˜ใŒใ€Œ่ฒทใฃใŸใ‚‰QOL็ˆ†ไธŠใŒใ‚Šใ—ใŸใ€ใ‚‚ใฎใ‚’ๆ•™ใˆใฆใ„ใŸใ ใ‘ใชใ„ใงใ—ใ‚‡ใ†ใ‹... ๆ—ฅใ€…ใ‚’่ฑŠใ‹ใซใ™ใ‚‹ใŸใ‚ใฎ่ฒทใ„็‰ฉใฎๅ‚่€ƒใซใ—ใŸใ„ใฎใงใ™... ้™คๆนฟๆฉŸ

    31K2.5K86868916M viewsView on X
  • Sep 20, 20265.5x their median

    Xใงใ‚ใกใ‚ƒใใกใ‚ƒ่‰ฏใ„ใฃใฆ่จ€ใ‚ใ‚ŒใฆใŸ็„กๅฐใฎใƒ˜ใƒƒใƒ‰ใ‚นใ‚ฏใƒฉใƒ–ใ€1500ๅ††ใ‚‚ใ—ใฆใ€Œ้ซ˜ใ‡โ€ฆใงใ‚‚โ€ฆใ€ใฃใฆ็ตๅฑ€่ฒทใฃใŸ ็ตๆžœใ€้ขจๅ‘‚ไธŠใŒใ‚Šใงใ‚‚ใƒ™ใ‚ฟใƒ™ใ‚ฟ๏ผ†่‡ญใ‹ใฃใŸๆ—ฆ้‚ฃใจ้•ท็”ทใฎ้ซชใฎๆฏ›ใŒใตใ‚ใตใ‚ใ‚ตใƒฉใ‚ตใƒฉใซใชใฃใฆใ™ใ”ใ‹ใฃใŸ ็Ÿฅใ‚Šๅˆใ„ๅ…จๅ“กใซๆ•™ใˆใŸใ„็ด ๆ™ดใ‚‰ใ—ใ•

    29K1.6K312002.7M viewsView on X
  • Oct 10, 20263.8x their median

    ไผŠ่—ค็™พ่Šฑใ€้ก”้ขไฝ™็™ฝ็„กโ€ฆ https://t.co/5i1PpKaI3A

    20K451352883.8M viewsView on X
  • Oct 4, 20263.6x their median

    25ใ€26ๆญณใ‚ใŸใ‚Šใ€ใ“ใฎๅนด้ฝขใฃใฆไบบ็”Ÿใฎๅˆ†ๅฒ็‚นใชๆฐ—ใŒใ—ใฆใ‚‹ใ€‚ไปŠใพใงไฝ•ใซๅ‘ใๅˆใฃใฆใ€ไฝ•ใ‚’็ฉใฟไธŠใ’ใฆใใŸใ‹ใฎๅทฎใŒๆ˜Ž็ขบใซๅ‡บๅง‹ใ‚ใ‚‹ใฎใŒๅคงไฝ“ใ“ใฎๅนด้ฝขใใ‚‰ใ„ใ€‚20ไปฃๅ‰ๅŠใพใงใฏ่ชค้ญ”ๅŒ–ใ›ใฆใ‚‚ใ€ใ“ใ“ใ‚‰่พบใ‹ใ‚‰ไป•ไบ‹ใ‚‚ใŠ้‡‘ใ‚‚่ฆ‹ใŸ็›ฎใ‚‚ไบบ้–“้–ขไฟ‚ใ‚‚ๅ…จ้ƒจใ€ŒไปŠใพใงใฉใ†็”ŸใใฆใใŸใ‹ใ€ใŒๅ‡บใฆใใ‚‹ใ€‚ ใใ‚Šใ‚ƒ็„ฆใ‚‹ไบบใ‚‚ๅข—ใˆใ‚‹ใ‚ˆใชใฃใฆๆ€ใ†ใ€‚

    18K1.3K201.2K1.8M viewsView on X
  • Aug 6, 20263.4x their median

    ็ตๅฑ€ใ€็ญ‹่†œใƒญใƒผใƒฉใƒผใŒ1็•ชๅŠนๆžœใงใ‚‹ใ€‚2้€ฑ้–“ใงใ“ใ“ใพใงๅค‰ใ‚ใฃใŸใฎโ€ฆ๏ผ๏ผ้ชจใ‚นใƒˆใฏใ™ใใ‚ดใƒ„ใใชใฃใกใ‚ƒใ†ใ‹ใ‚‰ใƒžใ‚นใƒˆใ ใ‚ˆ๐Ÿ˜ญ๐Ÿซต๐Ÿป https://t.co/oMHIuIElIy

    16K2.7K108682.1M viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 5.6K interactions against 170K followers, an engagement rate of 3.32%. Measured over 20 original posts, its engagement rate beats 99% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 1.2M times each, and 0.478% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 691.3% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 11:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 20 posts sampled, 75% carry an image or video and 5% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 131K interactions, about 23x its own typical post.

What is ๐ค๐ข๐ค๐ข's engagement rate on X?
๐ค๐ข๐ค๐ข (@kikiq28) has an engagement rate of 3.32%, based on the median interactions across 20 original posts from the last 30 days against 169,645 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 3.32%, ๐ค๐ข๐ค๐ข sits above the 90th percentile of the 205,374 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @kikiq28 have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 99% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the top 10% for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @kikiq28 post?
Most posts go out around 11:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 3 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going