KEVIN USA 💯 engagement report
@kevinUSA100 - 146K followers on X
Measured over 10 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 26, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 2.9K interactions against 146K followers, an engagement rate of 1.98%. Measured over 10 original posts, its engagement rate beats 95% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 131K times each, and 2.21% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 89.4% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.7 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 10% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 10 posts sampled, 80% carry an image or video and 10% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 92K interactions, about 32x its own typical post.
Measured over 10 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 26, 2026.
Compared with accounts its own size
KEVIN USA 💯's engagement rate beats 95% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 8 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 64% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 1.98%, KEVIN USA 💯 sits above the 75th percentile of the 204,880 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the top 25% band, which runs 0.678% to 2.55%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.024% |
| 50th percentile | 0.143% |
| 75th percentile | 0.678% |
| 90th percentile | 2.55% |
| 99th percentile | 82.4% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 17:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 80% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 10% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | +15% | +14% to +16% | 32K |
- 80% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 10% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
- Its average post runs 447 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Jan 3, 202632x their median
Now that Venezuela’s president has been captured, can we dispatch Delta Force to go after these motherfuckers next? https://t.co/nVgOKoMenD
- Sep 25, 20269.8x their median
I will take you all through the report page by page. This is the most damning document we have seen since. It confirms what I suspected all along. Everything about the planning was unnatural and it came straight from TPUSA Headquarters. I am so angry.
- May 4, 20264.5x their median
Dear Americans, Iran is not your Enemy, "Israel" is.
- Sep 25, 20261.8x their median
🚨 BREAKING: Iran threatens to cut submarine cables in the Arabian Gulf that provide global Internet connectivity. If Iran does that, it will plunge the entire world into the darkness of the Middle Ages. https://t.co/vo8JJphxVv
- Sep 25, 20261.7x their median
MASSIVE BREAKING: CHARLIE KIRK ASSASSINATION SECURITY REVIEW @RealCandaceO ▪️TPUSA CHOSE THE VENUE, INSISTING ON THE COURTYARD DESPITE OBJECTIONS FROM UVU ▪️TPUSA DECIDED NO NEED FOR EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES ▪️TPUSA DIDN'T PROVIDE TICKETING INFORMATION AND ANALYTICS TO UVU BEFOREHAND ▪️TPUSA CONDUCTED NO SECURITY WALK THROUGH ▪️TPUSA SKIPPED DAY-OF MEETING WITH UVUPD CHIEF LONG ▪️BRIAN HARPOLE LIED ABOUT THE VENUE ▪️TPUSA REFUSED TO COOPERATE WITH THE SECURITY INVESTIGATION Here's a list of TPUSA failings according to UVU's independent after-action security review: 1. TPUSA insisted on the more difficult and vulnerable outdoor venue, against UVU'S objections 2. TPUSA insisted on using its own ticketing system that deprived UVU of reliable, continuously available attendance information and made it harder to forecast crowd size, staffing and access requirements. 3. The TPUSA-supplied risk information understated the security concerns. They estimated only 600 attendees, characterized the event primarily as student-focused, and represented that there were no risk factors/safety/security concerns and NO NEED FOR EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES. 4. TPUSA was slow to establish direct security coordination with UVUPD. Dan Flood didn't contact Chief Long until September 3—only one week before the event. 5. TPUSA and its protection detail failed to conduct a formal pre-event security briefing and site walk-through with UVUPD, including: ▪️lines of sight; ▪️elevated positions and rooftops; ▪️building access; ▪️Charlie Kirk's arrival/departure; ▪️communications; ▪️staffing; ▪️emergency response; ▪️medical contingencies; ▪️emergency egress; ▪️post assignments; and ▪️who was responsible for which security function. The executive summary says such a site-specific meeting should have happened several days beforehand. Furthermore, Chief Long texted Flood asking to meet at the Hall of Flags walkway at about 11:00 a.m.; the contemplated face-to-face security meeting did not occur. 6. Brian Harpole's post-event account of who selected the venue conflicts with the report's evidence. Harpole said UVU forced them to use that venue. Records show TPUSA insisted on it. 7. TPUSA and its principal security people declined to cooperate with the after-action investigation. Brian Harpole, Dan Flood, and executive personnel at TPUSA HQ in Arizona all ignored attempts at contact.
- Sep 25, 20261.7x their median
🚨BREAKING: Rep. Jim Jordan is calling on the House to open an investigation into the original January 6th Committee and issue subpoenas to Liz Cheney, Nancy Pelosi, Adam Kinzinger and Adam Schiff. Do you support Jim Jordan on this? A. YES B. NO https://t.co/uoCPLJBAzd
- Sep 25, 2026
If you want to see how Charlie Kirk would report his own murder here it is. This is why hypocrisy is one of the worst sins in Islam as well as pre Schofield Christianity. If you believe God is the truth. And the Holy Spirit is the truth. To create “truth” to serve your vanity is the unforgivable sin. It does so much damage. Stubbing your toe and saying “damn it” or not submitting to a religious institution is not blasphemy. This video shows you what blasphemy actually is.
- Sep 25, 2026
The Israeli that tortured and killed hundreds of German women and children after the war. https://t.co/1Sxpcyb2Hh
- Sep 24, 2026
.@zeteo_news reported several months that Susan Collins’s husband has been working with the lobbyist running her super PAC. Thanks to @propublica’s stellar reporting, big news outlets have finally decided to cover it. https://t.co/bJIGqxPlCj
- Sep 25, 2026
Guys, never do this. Never, ever say this. This behavior is why she friend zoned him and is talking about him like he’s her gay best friend now. https://t.co/aBaSorZkrq
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 2.9K interactions against 146K followers, an engagement rate of 1.98%. Measured over 10 original posts, its engagement rate beats 95% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 131K times each, and 2.21% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 89.4% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.7 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 10% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 10 posts sampled, 80% carry an image or video and 10% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 92K interactions, about 32x its own typical post.
- What is KEVIN USA 💯's engagement rate on X?
- KEVIN USA 💯 (@kevinUSA100) has an engagement rate of 1.98%, based on the median interactions across 10 original posts from the last 30 days against 146,224 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 1.98%, KEVIN USA 💯 sits above the 75th percentile of the 204,880 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @kevinUSA100 have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 95% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the top 10% for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @kevinUSA100 post?
- Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.7 posts per day across the measured window.