Back to @kayleighmcenany's profile

Kayleigh McEnany engagement report

@kayleighmcenany - 4.0M followers on X

Measured over 36 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 24, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.014%
of 4.0M followers
Per impression
0.968%
59K views on a typical post
Reach
1.46%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
568
interactions (median)
Saved
0.026%
16 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
5.23/day
active 77% of days
Peak time
16:00 UTC
Saturday

A typical post picks up 568 interactions against 4.0M followers, an engagement rate of 0.014%. Measured over 36 original posts, its engagement rate beats 39% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 59K times each, and 0.968% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.46% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 5.2 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 77% of days. Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 36 posts sampled, 97% carry an image or video and 6% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 35K interactions, about 61x its own typical post.

Measured over 36 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 24, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Kayleigh McEnany's engagement rate beats 39% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 47% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.014%, Kayleigh McEnany sits above the 10th percentile of the 204,491 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.024%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.677%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 204,491 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,891 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.677%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 16:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 16:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 16:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Saturday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Saturday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video97% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link6% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 97% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 6% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 282 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Aug 8, 202661x their median

    Vance on Abdul El-Sayed: "He's gone after my kids! He's an odd guy. It's telling that instead of talking about what to do to make Michiganders better, he takes personal insults at me. The guy's crazy and would be a terrible senator" https://t.co/XKhzh0BTGK

    29K5.5K56485408K viewsView on X
  • Aug 29, 202647x their median

    🚨 ON FRAUD: @SecKennedy says "we closed down thousands of hospices in California. They didn't have patients. They were just billing us, and the way we found them is because the patients would never die..." ME: "Has Governor Newsom helped you?" KENNEDY: "No, they were not helpful in California." @SatAmericaFNC @FoxNews ⬇️

    21K5.2K29873286K viewsView on X
  • Sep 10, 202639x their median

    Today, we remember @charliekirk11 -- a father, a husband, and a servant of Christ, who quite literally changed the world. In a world of chaos and distraction, Charlie knew the mission in this short and fleeting life: "Therefore go and make disciples of all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit..." (Matthew 28:19) Charlie's beautiful wife, @MrsErikaKirk, has carried on that mission with a strength that is inspiring. Amid the deepest levels of grief a human can endure, she said, "I forgive him" -- the very words that our Savior asks us to offer when it seems unfathomable. I have seen countless videos across social media of young people turning to Christ and finding hope in a dark and hopeless world, citing Charlie Kirk as the reason they opened their Bibles. Charlie was Google's top search trend in 2025, and I do not believe it's by accident that we see parallel data showing young people discovering faith. What I know without doubt or question is this: Charlie changed the world. Charlie is with Jesus Christ. And in the moment that Charlie left this world, he stood before the throne and heard the words: "Well done, my good and faithful servant." (Matthew 25:23).

    20K1.9K51236130K viewsView on X
  • Aug 8, 202635x their median

    .@VP: "I was literally shocked by this, the first time that I realized, that when we send, for example, $8 billion to the state of California to run their food stamp program, they don’t even verify eligibility. You could have illegal aliens on that program... but the program is not there for illegal aliens. It's not there for fraudsters, and what California and so many Blue states have done is really turn down the eligibility requirements, turn down the verification requirements, and we unfortunately are just going to have to force them into some basic stuff—things like checking when somebody signs up for food stamps, are they in this country legally?"

    16K3.6K43877370K viewsView on X
  • Sep 4, 202632x their median

    There must be a consequence for strangling three children. Why is this a statement that evokes mass societal discord? When society cannot agree on a common set of facts and a common sets of morals, I worry grievously for our future.

    16K1.6K66349272K viewsView on X
  • Aug 8, 202632x their median

    “Unfortunately you have the Californias and the New Yorks of the world who seem to want their states to be defrauded by the fraudsters, but we can’t let that happen. It’s gone on for too long, and the president has asked us to stop it. We’re finally taking it seriously.” — VP https://t.co/QYlu3qhS5k

    14K2.5K1.5K123256K viewsView on X
  • Sep 20, 202631x their median

    🚨 "I didn't originally see Him face-to-face because my face was down because I was so concerned that the list of my mistakes was going to be pulled up," @gabe_poirot told me, reflecting on his 18 days in a coma when he saw Jesus Christ. "And I was done for. It was like black and white like I have no hope." "But He picks up my face, He looks me in the eyes, and He says, 'Gabriel, why are you concerned about that which has been paid for?" @SatAmericaFNC @FoxNews ⬇️

    15K2.6K218100380K viewsView on X
  • Oct 3, 202622x their median

    🚨 AMAZING: A group of U.S. scientists in Turkey believe they found Noah's Ark. Andrew Jones, Founder of @noahsarkscans, joined me from Turkey to lay out the evidence. He believes they will have confirmation of the findings by this winter, and the evidence so far is overwhelming. 🔹. Formation dimensions shaped like a boat that match the Biblical length of the Ark EXACTLY as written in Genesis. 🔹 Radar results suggesting organized patterns below the surface that could be parts of Ark halls or a deck. 🔹 Unexplained seashells in the region despite no sea nearby that suggest this was an area covered in water at one point. Absolutely incredible work laid out on @SatAmericaFNC @FoxNews. WATCH. ⬇️

    10.0K2.3K365111301K viewsView on X
  • Sep 28, 202621x their median

    There is truly no more perfect way to end an interview. Thank you to @FoxNews for the opportunity. See you tomorrow at 8am on @foxandfriends ! https://t.co/naSVTMGMxl

    11K33622611134K viewsView on X
  • Sep 19, 202621x their median

    🚨 The job of a JURY is not to spark national conversations about women's health. Juries are intended to decide whether FACTS match LAW. Effecting change is meant for legislatures, NOT juries. Yet the media seems entirely focused on questioning the HOLDOUT JUROR who tried to stay away from the limelight. Where are their questions for the other jurors? @SatAmericaFNC @FoxNews ⬇️

    9.8K1.8K33847163K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 568 interactions against 4.0M followers, an engagement rate of 0.014%. Measured over 36 original posts, its engagement rate beats 39% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 59K times each, and 0.968% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.46% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 5.2 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 77% of days. Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 36 posts sampled, 97% carry an image or video and 6% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 35K interactions, about 61x its own typical post.

What is Kayleigh McEnany's engagement rate on X?
Kayleigh McEnany (@kayleighmcenany) has an engagement rate of 0.014%, based on the median interactions across 36 original posts from the last 30 days against 4,014,138 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.014%, Kayleigh McEnany sits above the 10th percentile of the 204,491 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @kayleighmcenany have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 39% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @kayleighmcenany post?
Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day, at roughly 5.23 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going