Back to @kayleighmcenany's profile

Kayleigh McEnany engagement report

@kayleighmcenany - 4.0M followers on X

Measured over 95 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 1, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.015%
of 4.0M followers
Per impression
1.04%
59K views on a typical post
Reach
1.47%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
615
interactions (median)
Saved
0.017%
10 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
6.8/day
active 70% of days
Peak time
15:00 UTC
Saturday

A typical post picks up 615 interactions against 4.0M followers, an engagement rate of 0.015%. Measured over 95 original posts, its engagement rate beats 53% of 3,774 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 59K times each, and 1.04% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.47% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 6.8 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 70% of days. Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 95 posts sampled, 95% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 35K interactions, about 57x its own typical post.

Measured over 95 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 1, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Kayleigh McEnany's engagement rate beats 53% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,774 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 57% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.015%, Kayleigh McEnany sits above the 25th percentile of the 36,654 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.012% to 0.08%.

p100.002%
p250.012%
p50 (median)0.08%
p750.433%
p902.10%
p99160.5%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 36,654 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 106,977 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.012%
50th percentile0.08%
75th percentile0.433%
90th percentile2.10%
99th percentile160.5%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 15:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 15:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 6%Busiest hour: 15:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%51K
01:00 UTC-2%52K
02:00 UTC-3%50K
03:00 UTC-4%53K
04:00 UTC-6%43K
05:00 UTC-4%42K
06:00 UTC-4%48K
07:00 UTC-5%52K
08:00 UTC-4%61K
09:00 UTC-3%70K
10:00 UTC-2%72K
11:00 UTC-3%78K
12:00 UTC-2%86K
13:00 UTC-2%94K
14:00 UTC-4%97K
15:00 UTC-2%101K
16:00 UTC-3%98K
17:00 UTC-2%91K
18:00 UTC-1%85K
19:00 UTC-1%80K
20:00 UTC-1%74K
21:00 UTC-1%66K
22:00 UTC-1%57K
23:00 UTC-2%52K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Saturday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 5%Busiest day: Saturday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+4%231K
Monday0%288K
Tuesday-2%278K
Wednesday-1%251K
Thursday-1%245K
Friday-3%253K
Saturday+3%227K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Best tweets

  • Aug 8, 202657x their median

    Vance on Abdul El-Sayed: "He's gone after my kids! He's an odd guy. It's telling that instead of talking about what to do to make Michiganders better, he takes personal insults at me. The guy's crazy and would be a terrible senator" https://t.co/XKhzh0BTGK

    29K5.5K56485408K viewsView on X
  • Aug 29, 202644x their median

    🚨 ON FRAUD: @SecKennedy says "we closed down thousands of hospices in California. They didn't have patients. They were just billing us, and the way we found them is because the patients would never die..." ME: "Has Governor Newsom helped you?" KENNEDY: "No, they were not helpful in California." @SatAmericaFNC @FoxNews ⬇️

    21K5.2K29271262K viewsView on X
  • Aug 8, 202632x their median

    .@VP: "I was literally shocked by this, the first time that I realized, that when we send, for example, $8 billion to the state of California to run their food stamp program, they don’t even verify eligibility. You could have illegal aliens on that program... but the program is not there for illegal aliens. It's not there for fraudsters, and what California and so many Blue states have done is really turn down the eligibility requirements, turn down the verification requirements, and we unfortunately are just going to have to force them into some basic stuff—things like checking when somebody signs up for food stamps, are they in this country legally?"

    16K3.6K43877370K viewsView on X
  • Aug 8, 202629x their median

    “Unfortunately you have the Californias and the New Yorks of the world who seem to want their states to be defrauded by the fraudsters, but we can’t let that happen. It’s gone on for too long, and the president has asked us to stop it. We’re finally taking it seriously.” — VP https://t.co/QYlu3qhS5k

    14K2.5K1.5K123256K viewsView on X
  • Aug 15, 202616x their median

    🚨 HOLY CRAP!! California Democrats are moving to pass a law that lets criminals loose if they commit a "crime of necessity" This means if the crime is just "low level" enough...the person can walk. This is UTTER MADNESS... ASSEMBLYMAN DEMAIO (R): "Democrats say if you're poor — that forces you to rob a store." "NOBODY is robbing stores for food, bread and eggs! They're stealing NIKES and PLAY STATIONS!" The people already rejected this. It has to fail! @kayleighmcenany

    6.5K2.3K714276480K viewsView on X
  • Aug 17, 202615x their median

    🚨 You can't welcome Socialists/Communists into the tent. They will burn it down. You can't welcome Socialists/Communists into the caucus. They will destroy it. The "broad caucus" that Hakeem Jeffries envisions is unworkable when the people you are welcoming in profess support for policies that are at odds with the United States Constitution. @TheFive @FoxNews ⬇️

    7.3K1.4K34433135K viewsView on X
  • Aug 15, 202611x their median

    While Republicans fight for common sense, lower costs, and safer communities — the radical Marxists taking over the Democrat Party are pushing CRAZY policies like abolishing our border and prisons, defunding the police, shredding our Constitution, and dismantling our economy. They would simply destroy America. We WILL NOT allow our freedom and our country to be taken over by COMMUNISTS!

    3.7K1.1K1.7K125101K viewsView on X
  • Aug 8, 202611x their median

    "I think the guy is crazy and would be a terrible senator for the people of Michigan." @VP JD Vance unloads on Michigan Senate candidate Abdul El-Sayed, accusing him of resorting to personal attacks instead of explaining how he'd improve life for voters. "He's also gone after my kids. He's just kind of an odd guy," Vance says, before contrasting El-Sayed's economic approach with President Trump's agenda. Vance argues the path to prosperity is "rebuilding the middle class" and America's industrial base, while crediting Trump's policies with helping Michigan's auto industry. | @kayleighmcenany @SatAmericaFNC

    5.1K78364233502K viewsView on X
  • Aug 8, 202610x their median

    "We've destroyed their nuclear program. We've destroyed their conventional military." VP @JDVance delivers a blunt assessment of Iran, saying the Trump administration is now watching to see whether Tehran is willing to make the "long-term changes" needed for a better relationship with the U.S. "And if not, that's fine, too." Vance says the administration will keep applying pressure while pushing for more Middle East oil and gas production to help drive down energy prices for Americans. | @kayleighmcenany @SatAmericaFNC

    4.3K8061.1K80778K viewsView on X
  • Aug 13, 20269.8x their median

    More than $1 Billion in funding over 5 years, missing records, family payouts all while homelessness increased in LA. Enough is enough. HUD has cut funding to LAHSA and will continue to identify fraudulent activities across our programs. https://t.co/mGvaQZrla2

    4.9K1.0K9828104K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 615 interactions against 4.0M followers, an engagement rate of 0.015%. Measured over 95 original posts, its engagement rate beats 53% of 3,774 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 59K times each, and 1.04% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.47% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 6.8 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 70% of days. Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 95 posts sampled, 95% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 35K interactions, about 57x its own typical post.

What is Kayleigh McEnany's engagement rate on X?
Kayleigh McEnany (@kayleighmcenany) has an engagement rate of 0.015%, based on the median interactions across 95 original posts from the last 30 days against 4,034,676 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.015%, Kayleigh McEnany sits above the 25th percentile of the 36,654 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @kayleighmcenany have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 53% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,774 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @kayleighmcenany post?
Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day, at roughly 6.8 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going