Back to @kaspaunchained's profile

Kaspa engagement report

@kaspaunchained - 235K followers on X

Measured over 35 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 28, 2026.

Engagement

Top quarter for its size
Per follower
0.268%
of 235K followers
Per impression
2.65%
24K views on a typical post
Reach
10.1%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
634
interactions (median)
Saved
0.05%
12 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
2.07/day
active 90% of days
Peak time
12:00 UTC
Thursday

A typical post picks up 634 interactions against 235K followers, an engagement rate of 0.268%. Measured over 35 original posts, its engagement rate beats 76% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 24K times each, and 2.65% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 10.2% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.1 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 12:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 35 posts sampled, 66% carry an image or video, 17% are part of a thread and 14% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 2.3K interactions, about 3.7x its own typical post.

Measured over 35 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 28, 2026. Recurring tag: #bitcoin.

Compared with accounts its own size

Kaspa's engagement rate beats 76% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 71% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.268%, Kaspa sits above the 50th percentile of the 204,880 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.143% to 0.678%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 204,880 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,891 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 12:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 12:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 12:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Thursday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Thursday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video66% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link14% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 66% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 14% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 517 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Jun 30, 20263.7x their median

    Toccata is live! $KAS became ultra programmable today! https://t.co/N01jkPHtWa

    1.7K497762879K viewsView on X
  • Sep 20, 20263.3x their median

    Kaspa.

    1.7K2619752123K viewsView on X
  • Apr 30, 20262.4x their median

    Toccata consensus feature freeze is finally here after a heroic last-mile push by kas core devs. Aiming to reset TN12 tonight, or tomorrow at the latest. Genesis update: + 0x6b617370612d746573746e6574 // kaspa-testnet - 12, 2 // TN12, Launch 2 + 0x544f4343415441 // TOCCATA + 12, 3 // TN12, Launch 3

    1.0K387893495K viewsView on X
  • Jun 5, 20262.3x their median

    $KAS The Toccata Hard Fork is now live! Update your nodes well before June 30th so that you can remain in consensus! https://t.co/cNKPF0esfg

    1.1K307422443K viewsView on X
  • Apr 7, 20262.0x their median

    Watch Yonatan Sompolinsky speak at @OxfordUnion $KAS https://t.co/FZVtZJlL8N

    915310221160K viewsView on X
  • Sep 11, 20261.9x their median

    A lot of people think what makes Kaspa unique is the technology. But the technology is really the consequence of a deeper philosophical difference. Most crypto projects ask: How can we maximize performance without sacrificing decentralization? Kaspa asks: How can we maximize decentralization without sacrificing performance? That slight inversion of priorities changes everything. It changes what the system optimizes for, which tradeoffs are acceptable, and ultimately what kind of threat model matters. Kaspa and in particular the upcoming DAGKnight fork are built around the idea that a decentralized monetary network should remain resilient even under extreme failure scenarios like global infrastructure disruption, war, or other large-scale breakdowns. Because fast digital coordination should not force people to choose between trusting a small group of node operators over a small group of banks. For many applications, that distinction may not matter. But for the applications where credible neutrality, censorship resistance, and resilience matter most, that ideological edge is the product. Kaspa does not merely compete at the technological level. It competes at the philosophical level and the technology is just the downstream consequence of following that philosophy to the end.

    861276313350K viewsView on X
  • Sep 7, 20261.7x their median

    Time to level up https://t.co/1rz5eCCFXu

    88918031828K viewsView on X
  • Sep 22, 20261.7x their median

    kaspa is an open network for money and apps, secured by proof of work. you can transact without needing anyone’s approval. devs can build assets and contracts with rules the network itself enforces. miners compete to produce blocks through computing power and electricity, not the size of their KAS wallet. an attacker trying to undo a confirmed transaction has to compete against the combined mining power of the entire honest network while it keeps mining. even then, they can’t make nodes accept transactions that break the rules. kaspa includes and orders blocks mined in parallel, so miners blocks aren’t discarded simply for losing a race. those frequent blocks let the network reach agreement in seconds while keeping bitcoin’s proof-of-work security principles. kaspa calls this real-time decentralization.

    865203191629K viewsView on X
  • Aug 27, 20261.7x their median

    Real-time decentralization is the same security Bitcoin’s proof-of-work embodies, just in real time. Transactions that confirm safely after an hour on Bitcoin confirm in seconds on Kaspa. https://t.co/mWgPTGi1IM

    81021035743K viewsView on X
  • Sep 24, 20261.6x their median

    internet money should move at internet speed.

    837154221325K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#bitcoin

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 634 interactions against 235K followers, an engagement rate of 0.268%. Measured over 35 original posts, its engagement rate beats 76% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 24K times each, and 2.65% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 10.2% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.1 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 12:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 35 posts sampled, 66% carry an image or video, 17% are part of a thread and 14% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 2.3K interactions, about 3.7x its own typical post.

What is Kaspa's engagement rate on X?
Kaspa (@kaspaunchained) has an engagement rate of 0.268%, based on the median interactions across 35 original posts from the last 30 days against 235,200 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.268%, Kaspa sits above the 50th percentile of the 204,880 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @kaspaunchained have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 76% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the top quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @kaspaunchained post?
Most posts go out around 12:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.07 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going