Kaspa engagement report
@kaspaunchained - 235K followers on X
Measured over 35 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 28, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 634 interactions against 235K followers, an engagement rate of 0.268%. Measured over 35 original posts, its engagement rate beats 76% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 24K times each, and 2.65% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 10.2% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.1 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 12:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 35 posts sampled, 66% carry an image or video, 17% are part of a thread and 14% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 2.3K interactions, about 3.7x its own typical post.
Measured over 35 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 28, 2026. Recurring tag: #bitcoin.
Compared with accounts its own size
Kaspa's engagement rate beats 76% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 71% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.268%, Kaspa sits above the 50th percentile of the 204,880 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.143% to 0.678%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.024% |
| 50th percentile | 0.143% |
| 75th percentile | 0.678% |
| 90th percentile | 2.55% |
| 99th percentile | 82.4% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 12:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 66% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 14% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | +15% | +14% to +16% | 32K |
- 66% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 14% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
- Its average post runs 517 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Jun 30, 20263.7x their median
Toccata is live! $KAS became ultra programmable today! https://t.co/N01jkPHtWa
- Sep 20, 20263.3x their median
Kaspa.
- Apr 30, 20262.4x their median
Toccata consensus feature freeze is finally here after a heroic last-mile push by kas core devs. Aiming to reset TN12 tonight, or tomorrow at the latest. Genesis update: + 0x6b617370612d746573746e6574 // kaspa-testnet - 12, 2 // TN12, Launch 2 + 0x544f4343415441 // TOCCATA + 12, 3 // TN12, Launch 3
- Jun 5, 20262.3x their median
$KAS The Toccata Hard Fork is now live! Update your nodes well before June 30th so that you can remain in consensus! https://t.co/cNKPF0esfg
- Apr 7, 20262.0x their median
Watch Yonatan Sompolinsky speak at @OxfordUnion $KAS https://t.co/FZVtZJlL8N
- Sep 11, 20261.9x their median
A lot of people think what makes Kaspa unique is the technology. But the technology is really the consequence of a deeper philosophical difference. Most crypto projects ask: How can we maximize performance without sacrificing decentralization? Kaspa asks: How can we maximize decentralization without sacrificing performance? That slight inversion of priorities changes everything. It changes what the system optimizes for, which tradeoffs are acceptable, and ultimately what kind of threat model matters. Kaspa and in particular the upcoming DAGKnight fork are built around the idea that a decentralized monetary network should remain resilient even under extreme failure scenarios like global infrastructure disruption, war, or other large-scale breakdowns. Because fast digital coordination should not force people to choose between trusting a small group of node operators over a small group of banks. For many applications, that distinction may not matter. But for the applications where credible neutrality, censorship resistance, and resilience matter most, that ideological edge is the product. Kaspa does not merely compete at the technological level. It competes at the philosophical level and the technology is just the downstream consequence of following that philosophy to the end.
- Sep 7, 20261.7x their median
Time to level up https://t.co/1rz5eCCFXu
- Sep 22, 20261.7x their median
kaspa is an open network for money and apps, secured by proof of work. you can transact without needing anyone’s approval. devs can build assets and contracts with rules the network itself enforces. miners compete to produce blocks through computing power and electricity, not the size of their KAS wallet. an attacker trying to undo a confirmed transaction has to compete against the combined mining power of the entire honest network while it keeps mining. even then, they can’t make nodes accept transactions that break the rules. kaspa includes and orders blocks mined in parallel, so miners blocks aren’t discarded simply for losing a race. those frequent blocks let the network reach agreement in seconds while keeping bitcoin’s proof-of-work security principles. kaspa calls this real-time decentralization.
- Aug 27, 20261.7x their median
Real-time decentralization is the same security Bitcoin’s proof-of-work embodies, just in real time. Transactions that confirm safely after an hour on Bitcoin confirm in seconds on Kaspa. https://t.co/mWgPTGi1IM
- Sep 24, 20261.6x their median
internet money should move at internet speed.
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Recurring topics
The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 634 interactions against 235K followers, an engagement rate of 0.268%. Measured over 35 original posts, its engagement rate beats 76% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 24K times each, and 2.65% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 10.2% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.1 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 12:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 35 posts sampled, 66% carry an image or video, 17% are part of a thread and 14% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 2.3K interactions, about 3.7x its own typical post.
- What is Kaspa's engagement rate on X?
- Kaspa (@kaspaunchained) has an engagement rate of 0.268%, based on the median interactions across 35 original posts from the last 30 days against 235,200 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.268%, Kaspa sits above the 50th percentile of the 204,880 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @kaspaunchained have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 76% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the top quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @kaspaunchained post?
- Most posts go out around 12:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.07 posts per day across the measured window.