Back to @karlarboledas's profile

karla engagement report

@karlarboledas - 395K followers on X

Measured over 11 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 30, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.044%
of 395K followers
Per impression
0.1%
172K views on a typical post
Reach
44.0%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
171
interactions (median)
Saved
0.114%
196 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
3.3/day
active 53% of days
Peak time
23:00 UTC
Tuesday

A typical post picks up 171 interactions against 395K followers, an engagement rate of 0.044%. Measured over 11 original posts, its engagement rate beats 57% of 19,932 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 172K times each, and 0.1% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 43.4% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.3 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 53% of days. Most posts go out around 23:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 11 posts sampled, 73% carry an image or video and 45% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 6.1K interactions, about 36x its own typical post.

Measured over 11 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 30, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

karla's engagement rate beats 57% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (19,932 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 7% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.044%, karla sits above the 25th percentile of the 201,005 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.141%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.141%
p750.671%
p902.53%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 201,005 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,901 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.141%
75th percentile0.671%
90th percentile2.53%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 23:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 23:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 23:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Tuesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Tuesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video73% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link45% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 73% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 45% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 480 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 8, 202636x their median

    I'm selling my body. On September 19th, I'm competing in my first HYROX race in Turkey. You can advertise your startup on 10 of my muscles: - Your website is listed on https://t.co/49RnsFBVzP - Your logo will be tattooed on my body on race day - I'll share it on my YouTube and X accounts Bidding starts at $1,000. Each takeover doubles the price: $1,000 → $2,000 → $4,000. If outbid, you’re refunded minus the Stripe fee. Bidding closes on Thursday the 10th at midnight UTC (in 2 days), so I have enough time to print the winning tattoos. → Sponsor my body: https://t.co/49RnsFBVzP

    4.4K1448376905.0M viewsView on X
  • Sep 10, 202613x their median

    🚨El ex presidente de Google salió y confesó el secreto que cambiará la forma del mundo en los próximos años por culpa de la inteligencia artificial. El tipo confesó que crear riqueza y construir un negocio propio ahora es mucho más fácil, pero con una condición: si entras en este campo y entiendes el juego correctamente. Si solo tienes 30 días por delante para empezar y ejecutar este consejo e ingresar a este campo con fuerza, aquí está el mapa completo y las herramientas que necesitarás desde cero, todas 100% gratuitas: Fase 1: Entender la arquitectura y los fundamentos Arquitectura de los Agents: Para que entiendas cómo construir un agente de inteligencia artificial inteligente e independiente que tome decisiones y las ejecute. https://t.co/DDUwkuRU9x…🔗https://t.co/bx78msKfj6… Curso Claude Code 101: El comienzo básico para manejar la herramienta de programación aterradora de Anthropic dentro de la Terminal. 🔗 https://t.co/jbAhQl8ghU Aplicación práctica (Claude Code en acción): Experimentos en vivo de la herramienta mientras construye proyectos reales para que veas su poder por ti mismo. 🔗 https://t.co/saQ1ZdB9dx… Fase 2: Dominar el direccionamiento y el Contexto Ingeniería de Prompts (oficial): La guía oficial de Anthropic para escribir prompts profesionales que te saquen la máxima calidad del modelo. 🔗 https://t.co/8GsX3JksQV… Curso de Prompts Interactivos: Entrenamiento práctico e interactivo en GitHub para desarrollar tus habilidades de Prompting. 🔗 https://t.co/wnzvgOH6rJ… Archivo CLAUDE.md y adición de memoria: El secreto que hace que Claude recuerde el contexto y las reglas completas de tu proyecto y no se olvide con el tiempo. 🔗https://t.co/DDUwkuRU9x… Fase 3: Automatización y conexión con la realidad Protocolo MCP: La verdadera revolución... Conecta Claude con tus herramientas diarias y bases de datos como Slack, GitHub y Google. 🔗 https://t.co/gsQS1qCLW8 Habilidades (Skills): Enséñale a Claude pasos repetitivos y funciones personalizadas para que las reutilice en tu proyecto de manera inteligente. 🔗 https://t.co/uqiYQDNRu5 Habilidades (Skills): Enséñale a Claude pasos repetitivos y funciones personalizadas para que las reutilice en tu proyecto de manera inteligente. 🔗 https://t.co/uqiYQDNRu5 Fase 4: Guías de la comunidad de desarrolladores y profesionalismo Guía completa de Claude Code: Una guía masiva y de código abierto de la comunidad de desarrolladores llena de secretos y trucos. 🔗https://t.co/KfZiXSKbAT… Biblioteca Awesome Claude Code: Una colección legendaria de los mejores scripts, Skills y complementos listos para usar. 🔗https://t.co/FiDV3qXnRE… Academia de Anthropic: Todos los 13 cursos oficiales de la compañía con certificados completamente gratuitos. 🔗 https://t.co/qbI7lspxW4 Documentación oficial completa: La referencia exhaustiva y final para todo lo pequeño y grande en Claude. 🔗 https://t.co/Z4lGuiExym… guárdalo y sígueme para más → @karlarboledas Todos estos recursos son COMPLETAMENTE gratuitos y no te costarán ni un dólar, pero te darán una habilidad que te permitirá terminar el trabajo de un equipo completo tú solo y con la misma calidad.

    1.8K454219297K viewsView on X
  • Sep 16, 202610x their median

    Un ingeniero senior de IA en Microsoft acaba de revelar cómo los equipos de Microsoft crean agentes de IA con Anthropic. 34 minutos de taller gratuito, directamente por el equipo de Microsoft. Opus 4.7 + más de 1 400 herramientas MCP ya listas para usar. Conectas Claude a un agente → le agregas herramientas → lo despliegas en producción. Más útil que la mayoría de las formaciones de vibe-coding vendidas por 500 $. guárdalo y sígueme para más → @karlarboledas

    1.6K1112142.4M viewsView on X
  • Aug 30, 20268.6x their median

    Reduce el uso de tokens de Claude Code en un 90% Filtró los métodos exactos. La mayoría de las personas pasarán de largo. Nada complicado. Guárdalo para no perderlo. https://t.co/2PIwYixECO

    1.3K1333310522K viewsView on X
  • Aug 29, 20268.4x their median

    He cancelado mi suscripción de Claude de 200$/mes por esto. GPT 5.6-Luna es prácticamente gratis y han descubierto cómo no alcanzar nunca los límites de uso en Codex. Tarda 3 minutos en configurarse. Así se hace: 1. Instala este repositorio llamado “sol-advisor”. 2. Copia el “savings-prompt”. Y listo. guárdalo y sígueme para más → @karlarboledas

    1.3K124310147K viewsView on X
  • Sep 10, 20262.4x their median

    Yesterday we announced our series A to reimagine CRM as a business world model. I wanted explain what we mean by that, and why the CRM is the practical place to start building something much larger. https://t.co/j760peA0B2

    270634532172K viewsView on X
  • Aug 24, 20262.0x their median

    The AFTER THE STARS full trailer is now live on X too. The story of Caleb North, a former astronaut at the center of a neuroscience breakthrough, opening a future where memory, and everything humanity knows, compounds. An AI hybrid production. Real actors, real crew, AI-generated world. Competing for #FutureVisionXPRIZE @xprize

    254283822938K viewsView on X
  • Aug 28, 20261.6x their median

    Anthropic just dropped a 37 minute guide on building AI agents that automate an entire company. Free. From the engineers who built Claude. Agents that work, split tasks between each other and execute on their own. Save this before you lose it 🔖 https://t.co/hBUFR2HbAW

    2092829543K viewsView on X
  • Aug 28, 20261.5x their median

    https://t.co/Hu8U9fIYv1

    172244518126K viewsView on X
  • Sep 2, 2026

    https://t.co/ErktoUwSJV

    18816188421K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 171 interactions against 395K followers, an engagement rate of 0.044%. Measured over 11 original posts, its engagement rate beats 57% of 19,932 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 172K times each, and 0.1% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 43.4% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.3 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 53% of days. Most posts go out around 23:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 11 posts sampled, 73% carry an image or video and 45% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 6.1K interactions, about 36x its own typical post.

What is karla's engagement rate on X?
karla (@karlarboledas) has an engagement rate of 0.044%, based on the median interactions across 11 original posts from the last 30 days against 395,410 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.044%, karla sits above the 25th percentile of the 201,005 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @karlarboledas have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 57% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (19,932 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @karlarboledas post?
Most posts go out around 23:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 3.3 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going