精神科医・樺沢紫苑 engagement report
@kabasawa - 275K followers on X
Measured over 24 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 7, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 182 interactions against 275K followers, an engagement rate of 0.066%. Measured over 24 original posts, its engagement rate beats 54% of 6,874 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 18K times each, and 1.03% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 6.44% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.2 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 27% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 02:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 24 posts sampled, 38% carry an image or video and 63% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 7.6K interactions, about 42x its own typical post.
Measured over 24 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 7, 2026.
Compared with accounts its own size
精神科医・樺沢紫苑's engagement rate beats 54% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (6,874 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 7 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 47% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.066%, 精神科医・樺沢紫苑 sits above the 25th percentile of the 66,128 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.016% to 0.1%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.002% |
| 25th percentile | 0.016% |
| 50th percentile | 0.1% |
| 75th percentile | 0.499% |
| 90th percentile | 2.09% |
| 99th percentile | 119.9% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 02:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 38% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 63% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | +15% | +14% to +16% | 32K |
- 38% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 63% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
- Its average post runs 302 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Sep 6, 202642x their median
A single workout reduces overthinking. You don’t have to think your way out of the loop when you can move out of it. https://t.co/KPBHGv66mJ
- Aug 23, 20265.6x their median
出社するよりも完全リモートワークの方が幸福度が高いという研究結果 https://t.co/R6zdUamFQD
- Sep 5, 20262.8x their median
The Greatest Sci-Fi TV Shows of All Time. 👽🍿🔥 1. The X-Files ⭐️ 9.0/10 2. Black Mirror ⭐️ 8.7/10 3. Battlestar Galactica ⭐️ 8.7/10 4. Dark ⭐️ 8.7/10 5. Star Trek: The Next Generation ⭐️ 8.7/10 6. The Expanse ⭐️ 8.5/10 7. Fringe ⭐️ 8.4/10 8. Westworld ⭐️ 8.5/10 9. Doctor Who ⭐️ 8.5/10 10. Lost ⭐️ 8.3/10 11. Stranger Things ⭐️ 8.6/10 12. The Twilight Zone ⭐️ 9.0/10 13. Stargate SG-1 ⭐️ 8.4/10 14. Orphan Black ⭐️ 8.3/10 15. Silo ⭐️ 8.1/10 16. The 100 ⭐️ 7.5/10 17. 12 Monkeys ⭐️ 7.7/10 18. Raised by Wolves ⭐️ 7.4/10 19. Altered Carbon ⭐️ 7.9/10 20. The OA ⭐️ 7.8/10
- Sep 5, 20262.1x their median
クリストファー・ノーラン監督の 『オデュッセイア』をIMAX先行上映で観賞。 凄い! 凄い! 凄い! 現代に、こんなド迫力の史劇スペクタクル を作れたものだ!! 『インセプション』『TENET テネット』の ような斬新で見たこともないオリジナル脚本 にこだわってきたノーラン監督。 なぜ彼が今回、古代ギリシャの詩人ホメロスの 西洋最古の不朽の冒険叙事詩を題材にしたのか? 欧米人にとって、もっとも有名な物語の1つ なわけです。 映画を見る前は、「その理由」が 非常に気になっていたわけですが、 映画を見れば、すぐに解決しました。 ハリウッド全盛時代の史劇スペクタクルの再現。 いや「再現」ではなく「革新」。 全編IMAXフィルムカメラを使った撮影。 巨大なトロイアの街のセットを作り 2千人のエキストラを動員。 そして最小限のCG使用で、 とんでもない映像を作り上げました。 この映画を見て、大学生のとき 『ベン・ハー』を劇場の大画面で見た時の 感動を思い出したのです。 よくこんな映画を作れた物だ!! 史劇スペクタクルにどハマりした私は、 当時、相次いでリバイバル上映されていた 『十戒』『クレオパトラ』『スパルタカス』 などの史劇スペクタクルをむさぼるように 見たものです。 ハリウッドの黄金時代に作られた これらの作品は、 実物大の巨大なセットで 数千人~1万人ものエキストラを動員し 巨額の予算をかけて製作されていました。 現代では、当時の規模感での製作は不可能。 というのが、映画界の常識。 その不可能を「可能」にしたのが、 『オデュッセイア』です。 だから、凄い! のです。 最近では、CG、VFX技術も進歩して、 数万人の合戦も映画化されていますが、 CGでは迫力が出ないのです。 映画ファンであれば、昔のような、 ド迫力の史劇スペクタクルを見たい! 数千人規模の本物のモブ(群衆)シーンを見たい! という願望を持っていたはず。 そして、ノーラン監督も、 映画製作者として、 現代の最新技術を使い、 それでいて極力CGは使わずに、 リアルなセットで数千人のモブシーン を撮りたい! と思っていたのでしょう。 本作を見ると『ダンケルク』は、 『オデュッセイア』のための予行演習 にしか思えない。 インタビューには「20年越しの念願」 という言葉もありました。 父と子の物語なので、心理学的にも いろいろと言いたいのですが、 まだ映画公開前なので、 今回は、ストーリーについては触れません。 映画ファンとして、 この映画史に残る巨大な作品を IMAXで体験できたことが、 幸せでなりません。 音響が凄いので、 絶対にIMAXシアターで 本作を体験して欲しいです。 拙著『知性大全』では、 「AI時代は五感を使った"体験"が重要」 と書きましたが、 視覚、聴覚、そして大地を揺さぶる 振動覚は、 IMAXでなくては体験できないでしょう。
- Sep 6, 20261.7x their median
https://t.co/KneY3gbLvh
- Sep 4, 20261.7x their median
音読は全部するのではなく、覚えたいところだけした方がいい 単語の一部だけを音読した記憶実験では、後で正しく見分けられた割合は ・音読76% ・黙読60% 面白いのは、すべての単語を音読した人と、すべて黙読した人では明確な差がなかったこと。 これは、声に出した部分だけが目立ち、記憶に残りやすくなる「産出効果」と呼ばれる。 覚えたい部分を絞って音読するのがポイント
- Sep 6, 20261.6x their median
Los niños que comen más alimentos ultraprocesados tienden a tener menor cociente intelectual. Es posible que una mala dieta perjudique el desarrollo cerebral, lo que podría explicar una pequeña parte de ese descenso del IQ, pero, dada la alta heredabilidad genética del IQ, es muy probable que gran parte de la correlación se deba a que los padres y madres con menor IQ tiendan a darles más ultraprocesados a sus hijos, a la vez que les transmiten los genes que favorecen un menor IQ. Estos estudios no suelen controlar por la inteligencia de los progenitores, sino por educación y otros proxies imperfectos. En parte también puede deberse a que un alto consumo de ultraprocesados tiende a ir acompañado de otros malos hábitos que perjudican al cerebro, como la escasez de actividad física.
- Sep 4, 20261.6x their median
https://t.co/RhGtMCBaIM
- Sep 5, 2026
https://t.co/hYbOyghCm3
- Sep 4, 2026
栄養バランスの良い食事をとりなさい。 言葉で言うのは簡単ですが、 実際にそれを続けていくのは、至難の業です。 そこで、不足がちな栄養素を、サプリメントではなく、 「飲み物」から補充するのがお勧めです。 樺沢が実際に、日常生活でほぼ毎日飲んでい 健康に良い「飲み物」について、 動画で詳しく説明しました。 健康になりたいなら「飲み物」を見直しなさい 【精神科医・樺沢紫苑】 https://t.co/znMMkM2W1H
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 182 interactions against 275K followers, an engagement rate of 0.066%. Measured over 24 original posts, its engagement rate beats 54% of 6,874 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 18K times each, and 1.03% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 6.44% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.2 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 27% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 02:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 24 posts sampled, 38% carry an image or video and 63% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 7.6K interactions, about 42x its own typical post.
- What is 精神科医・樺沢紫苑's engagement rate on X?
- 精神科医・樺沢紫苑 (@kabasawa) has an engagement rate of 0.066%, based on the median interactions across 24 original posts from the last 30 days against 274,993 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.066%, 精神科医・樺沢紫苑 sits above the 25th percentile of the 66,128 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @kabasawa have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 54% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (6,874 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @kabasawa post?
- Most posts go out around 02:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.2 posts per day across the measured window.