Back to @k____dhen1's profile

kay__dhenn engagement report

@k____dhen1 - 63K followers on X

Measured over 12 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 14, 2026.

Engagement

Top 10% for its size
Per follower
36.7%
of 63K followers
Per impression
13.7%
144K views on a typical post
Reach
268.7%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
20K
interactions (median)
Saved
3.71%
5.3K bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.9/day
active 83% of days
Peak time
05:00 UTC
Saturday

A typical post picks up 20K interactions against 63K followers, an engagement rate of 36.7%. Measured over 12 original posts, its engagement rate beats 100% of 20,445 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 144K times each, and 13.7% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 229.6% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.9 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 05:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 12 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 33K interactions, about 1.7x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #zzzero, #remielle, #ゼンゼロ.

Measured over 12 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 14, 2026. Recurring tags: #zzzero, #remielle, #ゼンゼロ.

Compared with accounts its own size

kay__dhenn's engagement rate beats 100% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,445 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 5 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 98% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 36.7%, kay__dhenn sits above the 90th percentile of the 204,694 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the top 10% band, which runs 2.55% to 82.4%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.677%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 204,694 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,880 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.677%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 05:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 05:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 05:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Saturday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Saturday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video100% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--8%-9% to -7%41K
  • 100% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 26 characters, which falls in the under 80 characters band. Across the catalog, posts under 80 characters run 8% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Oct 4, 20261.7x their median

    voodoo magic https://t.co/VVC6dwHPgg

    31K2.4K353267K viewsView on X
  • Oct 3, 20261.6x their median

    Malfoid💢 https://t.co/PqIRHIMDtE

    28K2.5K255180K viewsView on X
  • Oct 5, 20261.6x their median

    🥵🥵 https://t.co/INcj6JeJLB

    28K2.3K301166K viewsView on X
  • Sep 24, 2026

    🩷💙 https://t.co/6DqIBhXVz6

    26K2.2K195196K viewsView on X
  • Sep 28, 2026

    ☂️💋 https://t.co/Oz6qNuWVkW

    20K1.5K150174K viewsView on X
  • Sep 18, 2026

    https://t.co/CFWHSmCScd

    19K1.4K192145K viewsView on X
  • Oct 6, 2026

    https://t.co/j0GiGyuDFC

    17K1.4K122105K viewsView on X
  • Sep 19, 2026

    https://t.co/r38aQ9EH6l

    17K1.5K236129K viewsView on X
  • Sep 30, 2026

    https://t.co/1NzoQclIC0

    16K1.3K222143K viewsView on X
  • Sep 26, 2026

    https://t.co/jT6abseycC

    12K83882104K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#zzzero#remielle#ゼンゼロ

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 20K interactions against 63K followers, an engagement rate of 36.7%. Measured over 12 original posts, its engagement rate beats 100% of 20,445 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 144K times each, and 13.7% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 229.6% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.9 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 05:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 12 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 33K interactions, about 1.7x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #zzzero, #remielle, #ゼンゼロ.

What is kay__dhenn's engagement rate on X?
kay__dhenn (@k____dhen1) has an engagement rate of 36.7%, based on the median interactions across 12 original posts from the last 30 days against 62,706 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 36.7%, kay__dhenn sits above the 90th percentile of the 204,694 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @k____dhen1 have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 100% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,445 accounts), which puts it in the top 10% for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @k____dhen1 post?
Most posts go out around 05:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.9 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going