H.E. Justin Sun 👨🚀 🌞 engagement report
@justinsuntron - 4.3M followers on X
Measured over 79 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 24, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 73 interactions against 4.3M followers, an engagement rate of 0.002%. Measured over 79 original posts, its engagement rate beats 15% of 20,182 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 136K times each, and 0.053% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.17% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 7.7 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 09:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 79 posts sampled, 87% carry an image or video and 35% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 51K interactions, about 704x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #justinsunprize, #tronecostar, #token2049.
Measured over 79 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 24, 2026. Recurring tags: #justinsunprize, #tronecostar, #token2049.
Compared with accounts its own size
H.E. Justin Sun 👨🚀 🌞's engagement rate beats 15% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,182 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 3% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.002%, H.E. Justin Sun 👨🚀 🌞 sits below the 10th percentile of the 204,491 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.024%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.024% |
| 50th percentile | 0.143% |
| 75th percentile | 0.677% |
| 90th percentile | 2.55% |
| 99th percentile | 82.4% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 09:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 87% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 35% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | +15% | +14% to +16% | 32K |
- 87% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 35% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
- Its average post runs 386 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Oct 9, 2026704x their median
对话孙宇晨：年轻人如何抓住AI时代的机会？ https://t.co/nHXFkXKjhn
- Sep 1, 2026331x their median
《致胡锡进老师》 胡锡进老师： 您第二篇文章的最后一句是，做人还是要老实、厚道一些。我想老实地向您请教一件事。 我是一九九零年生人，今年三十六岁，到了婚育的年纪。您是长辈，比我大整三十岁，我读北大的时候就读您的文章，所以这件事我想问您，不想问别人。 全中国二十岁到四十岁的男性有两亿，女性也有两亿。她们那一边的代价，不该由我来说，我只说我这一边。 怎么和女性相处，怎么组成家庭，怎么生儿育女，这条路我们没有走过，没有人教过我们，我们不懂。旁人看这些是吃瓜，对这两亿人，这是每天早上醒来就要面对的事。 我不知道，一个中国男人是否应当支付高额的彩礼；如果应当，是按定额，还是按他财产的比例。 我不知道，生育这件事，男方应当为它付出多少代价。 我不知道，婚前婚后女方提出的要求，男方是否都应当满足；如果没有满足、女方离开，男方是否有权取回彩礼；女方拒绝，男方是否可以走法律途径。 我也不知道，一个男人礼数尽了，父母见了，分手很久，钱要不回来，人也找不到之后，是否有权向公众说出自己的看法。我选了说。这对不对？ 这些问题，我没有答案。有些问题，国家有它的答案，一号文件写了，最高法也出了解释，我读过，也信；但文件写在纸上，彩礼谈在饭桌上，中间隔着现实的规矩。您是长辈，您的答案，我也尊重，就像我对法院最终的彩礼判决无条件尊重一样。 彩礼总归是要付的。天南地北，白丁鸿儒，无非是三万、三十万、三百万、三千万的分别。这是两亿青年男性都要承受的代价，我们认。 一个人算不清一笔账的时候，最稳妥的做法是不算。我出生的一九九零年，全国出生了两千三百多万人；去年，七百九十二万，建国以来最少。 我不认为这全是一笔账的缘故，但少的那三分之二里，很多人不是不想，是不知道这条路上要付什么、付多少、付了之后算不算数。人不会因为代价高而退出，退出，是因为看不见代价的边在哪里。 这个代价的规则究竟是什么，我们不知道。 两亿人在等这个答案，因为这是他们成家的第一步，也将决定未来三十年这个国家由谁组成。 我今天没有答案。我希望三十年后，有年轻人来问我这个问题的时候，我能给他一个。 孙宇晨
- Sep 3, 2026254x their median
《再致胡锡进老师——什么才是体面》 胡锡进老师： 上次给您写信，是向您请教彩礼的规矩。这次想请教一件更大的事。 您的三篇文章，我都读了许多遍。您批评我不体面。这些天我反复想的，不是怎么回答您，而是慢慢发现：我真正不清楚的，是您说的体面和我说的体面，是不是同一个东西。 什么才是真正的体面？ 您是长辈，一九六零年生人，比我刚好大三十岁。您那一代人的体面，我在父辈身上见过。无法可依的年代，两个人做成一件事，靠的是一句话、一杯酒、一个愿意作保的人。作保的人拿什么保？拿他一辈子的名声、位置、关系。 我小时候见过一位这样的长者：别人几年要不回的账，他一顿饭要了回来；两家人几乎反目，他各打五十大板，两边都服。他一生没有签过几份合同，但他说过的话，没有一句落过空。那个年代的体面是有重量的，这是那个时代资源分配的规则。我的父辈受过这种体面的恩惠。这份功劳，我认，而且记着。 我是一九九零年生人。我们这代人是在另一种东西里长大的：计算机、算法、合同、法律、白纸黑字。它冷，冷得常常让您那一代觉得无情。但当我抚摸着这些冰冷不近人情的东西，那时我隐约觉得，最大的体面，也许是不用讲体面。 我们这代人做的事，是试着把饭桌上的事情，搬进法律，搬进代码，搬进人工智能。 两代人各有一套体面，也各有一本账。我想把我想不清楚的三个问题写下来。这三个问题不是问您的，也不是问我自己的，是想把它们放到桌面上，问给下一个三十年的中国年青人。 第一问：一个人受了损害，被夺走了钱、尊严、时间，是消化它体面，还是主张它体面？ 您那一代的答案是消化，咽回去。打掉牙往肚里咽，在那个年代不是懦弱，几乎是成年礼，委屈没有去处，消化就是仅有的尊严。而且你们真诚地相信，不计较是一种修养，即便内耗到难以复加。我见过这种修养最好的样子：一位老人吃了大亏，一生不提，把气力都用在往前过日子上，儿孙满堂的时候，谁也看不出他缺过什么，只是谁也没见过他深夜辗转的样子。他不是不知道自己有理，而是不相信有理有用。 我这一代的答案是主张，说出来。不是我们脾气大，是委屈第一次有了去处：什么算数、什么不算数，越来越多地写在了纸上。受了损害去立案，在我们看来不是撕破脸，是把脸交给规则去评，交给公众去评。每个人也第一次有了自己的讲台，只是讲台上说的话，同样要经得起规则的称量。 消化有消化的尊严，主张有主张的代价。哪一种更体面，我不确定。 第二问：人和人做事，彼此之间相信道德交情，还是相信合同与算法？ 道德与交情的好处，我不敢小看。它快，它暖，它在规则够不着的地方依然有效，今天中国的许多事，仍然是交情在办，而且办得不坏。一个人愿意以道德为另一个人作保，这件事本身，任何时代都值得敬重。 合同与算法的好处是另一种：它让互不相识的人可以合作，让没有引荐的年青人有一张入场券，让信用离开具体的人也能存在。交情护得住熟人，护不住陌生人；合同认得了条款，认不了难处。 而我们这代人真实的处境，是站在两套办法的中间： 合同签了，还是要吃饭；道理占了，还是要找人。这中间的路要走多久、怎么走，我不确定。 但是我有预感： 年青人往后要去的地方，越来越多是没有熟人的地方，新的城市，新的行业，新的国家。在没有熟人的地方，面子是带不走的，能带走的只有合同和算法。它们不认人，所以认所有人。 我做的东西，绝大多数使用它的人不认识我，也不需要相信我的人品，他们只需要相信规则本身。这件事教育了我。 第三问：一个人未来财富的创造，应当来自他占据的位置，还是来自他创造的东西？ 这一问，我把自己也放进去问。我的行业很年轻，规则来得比行业晚，我们是在创业创新长大的一代年青人，从来就没有过什么正确答案。我没有资格站在这个问题外面。正因为如此，我格外希望它被认真问下去，问所有人，也问我。一个时代敬重什么样的富人，年青人就会成为什么样的人。这个问题的答案，比任何一个富人的答案都重要。 我见过两种富起来的路。一种富贵长在人身上：认识谁，跟过谁，坐在哪张桌子的哪个位置。人在，钱在；人走，茶凉。一种富贵长在东西上：一项技术，一个产品，一行代码，它做出来那天起，就不再需要主人守着，天南地北的陌生人都可以用它、检验它、靠它谋生。 两种路，中国都走过，都还在走。哪一种走得更远，我们这代人正在用自己的一生下注。 三个问题，写完了。 这三问，轮不到您和我裁决。而是今天的九零后，零零后，一零后，今年出生的孩子，三十年后正当壮年。他们会用他们认定的体面去待人、经商、成家、立业，这个国家将来是什么样子，说到底，是他们的模样。 您比我年长三十岁，见过我没见过的年代；我比您年轻三十岁，会看到您看不到的年代。可是在三十年后的年青人面前，您和我坐在同一排：都只有发言权，没有裁决权。 您让我在外多为故国做些有益的事情，故国在我心中重如千钧。太空里什么都是失重的，唯独这一样，我称过，分量没变。 您是长辈。这一排里，最该谦卑的是我。所以这封信不是论战，是交卷。 我的答案只有一句：最大的体面是不用讲体面，这就是我理解的体面。 我知道这句话会被比我年青的人修改。我期待被修改。 三十年后，如果有年青人拿着更好的答案来找我们，希望您和我都还在，都还愿意听。 孙宇晨
- Mar 27, 2025200x their median
From a visionary to a global force — honored to be featured on Forbes as Crypto’s Billionaire Barker. TRON’s journey continues, powering a global payment system with 300 million users and counting. Decentralization will prevail. https://t.co/m6FXcbrvMJ
- Sep 9, 2026134x their median
大家都说，大压抑时代，高富帅已经过时了，孙学，黄毛，薄肌才是版本答案，作为孙学创始人，我将系统性吸收黄毛与薄肌理论，朝闻道夕死可矣！
- Sep 1, 2026104x their median
鉴于全网对我身高的争议已持续多日，本人现公开招标一家权威计量机构对本人身高进行测量。要求：精度毫米级，结果可溯源至国际标准，全程直播。各类权威人士与机构等均可报名。
- Sep 9, 202669x their median
版本答案 https://t.co/1wcgHJOntr
- Sep 16, 202665x their median
https://t.co/z5PCEdqltE
- Aug 31, 202655x their median
这段时间，关于我和我们团队的各种说法很多。我不打算逐条回应。 我想说的是另一件事： 我对我们从事的事业抱有绝对的信心。这种信心不来自我本人，而来自数学、密码学和人工智能本身已经取得的突破。这些突破一旦发生就不可逆转，不以任何人、任何机构的意志为转移。 过去十几年，这个行业经历过无数次"这次真的结束了"。每一次，技术都在噪音散去之后继续向前。政策会变，舆论会变，而数学不会。地球上的八十亿人，最终都会直接或间接地使用建立在这些技术之上的服务。 我们的使命从未改变：让这些服务足够可靠、足够完善，以至于当那一天到来时，人们选择的是我们。 我在这里，一直在这里，永远在这里。
- Sep 24, 202648x their median
AI时代所有优点都不重要了，你只需要保持一个优点----听劝！
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Recurring topics
The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 73 interactions against 4.3M followers, an engagement rate of 0.002%. Measured over 79 original posts, its engagement rate beats 15% of 20,182 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 136K times each, and 0.053% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.17% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 7.7 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 09:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 79 posts sampled, 87% carry an image or video and 35% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 51K interactions, about 704x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #justinsunprize, #tronecostar, #token2049.
- What is H.E. Justin Sun 👨🚀 🌞's engagement rate on X?
- H.E. Justin Sun 👨🚀 🌞 (@justinsuntron) has an engagement rate of 0.002%, based on the median interactions across 79 original posts from the last 30 days against 4,302,895 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.002%, H.E. Justin Sun 👨🚀 🌞 sits below the 10th percentile of the 204,491 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @justinsuntron have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 15% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,182 accounts), which puts it in the bottom quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @justinsuntron post?
- Most posts go out around 09:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day, at roughly 7.67 posts per day across the measured window.