Fara Kaufman engagement report
@justfara - 214K followers on X
Measured over 53 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 4, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 15 interactions against 214K followers, an engagement rate of 0.007%. Measured over 53 original posts, its engagement rate beats 20% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 576 times each, and 2.60% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.27% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 57% of days. Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 53 posts sampled, 64% carry an image or video and 32% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 41K interactions, about 2735x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #data, #voteblue.
Measured over 53 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 4, 2026. Recurring tags: #data, #voteblue.
Compared with accounts its own size
Fara Kaufman's engagement rate beats 20% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 71% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.007%, Fara Kaufman sits above the 10th percentile of the 205,152 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.024%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.024% |
| 50th percentile | 0.143% |
| 75th percentile | 0.678% |
| 90th percentile | 2.55% |
| 99th percentile | 82.4% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 17:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 64% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 32% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | -3% | -3% to -2% | 54K |
- 64% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 32% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
- Its average post runs 129 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Sep 3, 20262735x their median
Billionaire Glenn Dubin and his wife Dr Eva Dubin are named in the Epstein files. Glenn over 700 times and Eva over 6,000 times. Eva dated Jeffrey Epstein from 1983 to 1991. Victim testimony has said that Eva was in the household during the abuse and knew of it. Victim Virginia Giuffre named Glenn as one of her abusers. Eva testified for the defense at Ghislaine Maxwellâs trial where Maxwell was found guilty and sentenced to 20 years.
- Sep 27, 20262409x their median
https://t.co/nXf5zRUv0A
- Sep 7, 202647x their median
Trump will TACO. Heâll never allow this to continue. He knows he will lose. Question is, why does it take the BBC to call Trump out ? Everyone in the U.S. knew exactly what Trump was doing, but nobody did anything. Pathetic⌠https://t.co/TBAjbUZRXQ
- Sep 6, 20264.7x their median
Damage https://t.co/EqtyJfpmKA
- Sep 30, 20264.7x their median
https://t.co/S5F4uibgxC
- Sep 28, 20264.3x their median
Don't mess with Libraries https://t.co/zChdED3dpr
- Sep 4, 20263.9x their median
A newscaster interviewing Trump asks, âOf the 15,000 lies you have told the public while in office, which one is your favorite. Trumpâs face reddens and he answers, âI donât lie!â The newscaster smiles and says, âyeah, thatâs my favorite one too.ââźď¸. đ (shared from Ray Coleman https://t.co/WSrOfWYF4l
- Sep 27, 20263.4x their median
MAGA seems very quiet about the fact Trump flew Communist China's flag over the Oval Office this week.
- Sep 5, 20262.7x their median
A Gold Star widow says her benefits hinge on whether Congress declared war. JD Vance had to ask who she was. Major John "Alex" Klinner was 33, from Trussville, Alabama. He joined the Air Force through ROTC at Auburn and flew tankers for eight years, four deployments, 362 combat hours. On March 12 his KC-135 went down in western Iraq supporting the Iran operation. Six airmen died. He left his wife, Libby, and three children under three: a toddler and twin babies. Alabama lowered its flags. Thirteen thousand strangers sent his family more than a million dollars. On March 18, the President of the United States stood on the tarmac at Dover Air Force Base as he came home. Pete Hegseth stood there. The Chairman of the Joint Chiefs stood there. The Speaker of the House stood there. They knew his name in March. Last weekend, Libby Klinner posted this: "The Air Force recently told me that because we haven't officially declared war, my kids and I aren't eligible for some benefits. So not only was my husband killed in a war he never wanted to participate in, but now the benefits we're left with are being dictated by semantics and public perceptions. 6 months of a war that we can't call a war." The benefits she named are the ones the government reserves for combat: hostile-fire pay, the combat-zone tax exclusion. Her husband died under hostile fire in a combat zone. The paperwork just won't use the word. A war we can't call a war. She chose that phrase, and this week the Vice President proved her right. Asked whether the conflict is a war, JD Vance said: "I wouldn't call it a war." The same week, the Commerce Secretary said there had been no American deaths in it at all. Eighteen Americans are dead. Six of them died on Alex Klinner's plane. On Thursday, CNN's Kaitlan Collins asked Vance at the White House whether he and the President would personally ensure the Klinner family gets every benefit it is owed. His first words: "So, what's her name? You said his name was Alex Klinner?" Then he asked for the family's contact information. Then he said this: "Obviously, our hearts break for every single person who has lost their lives in this operation. We want to be as helpful as we can and make sure she gets everything she is entitled to." The Air Force says it contacted Libby Klinner on August 31 and is auditing her entitlements. Its statement: "We understand this matter has been difficult for Mrs. Klinner and her family, and we are committed to addressing her concerns with care and respect." It has not said why she was told what she was told. Maybe it was a paperwork error. Maybe it gets fixed. If so, good. It should not take a grieving mother's post going viral, and a reporter reading it aloud to the Vice President, for the government to count a widow whose husband it honored at Dover. Her name is Libby Klinner. Her husband's name is Alex. The only word this administration won't say is war. ___
- Sep 3, 20262.7x their median
Andy Borowitz 8h ¡ WASHINGTONâAn eighty-year-old man with severe dementia has started calling common objects different names, a leading expert in cognitive decline said on Thursday. The expert, Dr. Davis Logsdon of the University of Minnesota Medical School, noted that the confused man had mistaken the names of major bodies of water and a prominent performing arts center in his city of residence. The fact that the man has reportedly passed cognitive tests during his annual physicals means that âhe is not getting the care he needs,â Logsdon said. Calling the manâs dementia âadvanced,â the expert said, âHe must immediately be removed from any position where he can cause harm.â
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Recurring topics
The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 15 interactions against 214K followers, an engagement rate of 0.007%. Measured over 53 original posts, its engagement rate beats 20% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 576 times each, and 2.60% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.27% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 57% of days. Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 53 posts sampled, 64% carry an image or video and 32% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 41K interactions, about 2735x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #data, #voteblue.
- What is Fara Kaufman's engagement rate on X?
- Fara Kaufman (@justfara) has an engagement rate of 0.007%, based on the median interactions across 53 original posts from the last 30 days against 213,567 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.007%, Fara Kaufman sits above the 10th percentile of the 205,152 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @justfara have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 20% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the bottom quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @justfara post?
- Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.03 posts per day across the measured window.