Back to @justcfc's profile

Just Chelsea engagement report

@justcfc - 72K followers on X

Measured over 55 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 16, 2026.

Engagement

Top quarter for its size
Per follower
0.935%
of 72K followers
Per impression
7.15%
9.1K views on a typical post
Reach
13.1%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
654
interactions (median)
Saved
0.044%
4 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
2.07/day
active 20% of days
Peak time
17:00 UTC
Saturday

A typical post picks up 654 interactions against 72K followers, an engagement rate of 0.935%. Measured over 55 original posts, its engagement rate beats 86% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 9.1K times each, and 7.15% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 12.8% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.1 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 20% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 55 posts sampled, 65% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 52K interactions, about 80x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #cfc, #aporla3, #loanwatch.

Measured over 55 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 16, 2026. Recurring tags: #cfc, #aporla3, #loanwatch.

Compared with accounts its own size

Just Chelsea's engagement rate beats 86% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 6 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 92% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.935%, Just Chelsea sits above the 75th percentile of the 205,048 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the top 25% band, which runs 0.678% to 2.55%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,048 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,894 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 17:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 17:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 17:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Saturday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Saturday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video65% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 65% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 210 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • May 22, 202580x their median

    He was the GOAT! 🤣💙 [THREAD] https://t.co/zlzWzCQth1

    50K1.8K1614711M viewsView on X
  • Sep 14, 202611x their median

    🚨🔵 Xabi Alonso’s team is hopeful that Marco Palestra would be available for the Brentford game on Friday. (@BobbyVincentFL) #CFC https://t.co/lRuVLVpxG2

    7.1K350321986K viewsView on X
  • Sep 14, 20266.6x their median

    🚨🔵 Thibaut Courtois on Xabi Alonso: “I had a conversation with him during the World Cup, he asked me for advice on something. I’m happy for him, I really liked him as a coach. Unfortunately, it didn’t work out in Madrid, but I’m sure he’ll do great things at Chelsea. “I think they also have to solve some of the same problems we have, namely that we concede too many chances. I’m sure that once they find their balance, everything will be fine.” (@SkySports) #CFC

    4.1K174107183K viewsView on X
  • Sep 15, 20264.7x their median

    #UCL Finals for 2028 and 2029 will be staged in Munich and Barcelona. 2029 #UWCL Final coming to Wales.🏟️ UEFA Champions League ·    2028: Munich Football Arena, Munich ·    2029: Camp Nou, Barcelona UEFA Women’s Champions League ·    2028: Parc Olympic Lyonnais, Lyon-Décines ·    2029: National Stadium of Wales, Cardiff UEFA Europa League ·    2028: National Arena, Bucharest ·    2029: National Stadium Serbia, Belgrade UEFA Conference League ·    2028: Juventus Stadium, Turin ·    2029: Puskás Aréna, Budapest UEFA Super Cup ·    2027: Johan Cruyff ArenA, Amsterdam ·    2028: Astana Arena, Astana

    2.7K3053850408K viewsView on X
  • Sep 15, 20264.0x their median

    🚨🔵 Chelsea will closely monitor Alex Scott throughout the season as they assess their options. The club explored the free-agent market, but Xabi Alonso decided to stick with his current options. (@BobbyVincentFL) #CFC https://t.co/HUSqGQzFEX

    2.5K1047326K viewsView on X
  • Sep 14, 20263.6x their median

    🚨🔵 Jordan Henderson in training today ahead of the Brentford game #CFC https://t.co/Hf9OaN6YP3

    2.3K525216K viewsView on X
  • Sep 16, 20263.5x their median

    🚨🔵🧑‍🏫 Xabi Alonso has introduced a tactical board to help Chelsea players better understand and absorb his system. Take a look. 👀 #CFC https://t.co/UCCRunSaL7

    2.2K8315128K viewsView on X
  • Sep 14, 20262.7x their median

    🚨🔵 Andy Madley has been appointed referee for Brentford vs Chelsea. Chelsea have won just one of the last three matches he has officiated. #CFC https://t.co/VONdNTTVTm

    1.7K7526722K viewsView on X
  • Sep 15, 20262.5x their median

    🚨🔵 Chelsea players with the most distance covered in the Premier League this season: 1️⃣ Morgan Rogers — 43.8 km 2️⃣ João Pedro — 41.8 km 3️⃣ Cole Palmer — 41.5 km 4️⃣ Reece James — 36.2 km 5️⃣ Malo Gusto — 35.2 km 📊 Rogers leads the way for Chelsea with 43.8km covered. #CFC https://t.co/LTIJpWvgxD

    1.6K675314K viewsView on X
  • Sep 15, 20262.3x their median

    🚨🔵 JUST IN: Chelsea are monitoring JJ Gabriel. (@alex_crook) #CFC https://t.co/ualAu0Da8n

    1.5K3812314K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#cfc#aporla3#loanwatch#ucl#uwcl

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 654 interactions against 72K followers, an engagement rate of 0.935%. Measured over 55 original posts, its engagement rate beats 86% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 9.1K times each, and 7.15% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 12.8% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.1 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 20% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 55 posts sampled, 65% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 52K interactions, about 80x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #cfc, #aporla3, #loanwatch.

What is Just Chelsea's engagement rate on X?
Just Chelsea (@justcfc) has an engagement rate of 0.935%, based on the median interactions across 55 original posts from the last 30 days against 71,519 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.935%, Just Chelsea sits above the 75th percentile of the 205,048 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @justcfc have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 86% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the top quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @justcfc post?
Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.07 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going