Back to @jrisco's profile

Risco engagement report

@jrisco - 1.2M followers on X

Measured over 7 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 23, 2026.

Engagement

Per follower
0.05%
of 1.2M followers
Per impression
1.92%
33K views on a typical post
Reach
2.62%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
628
interactions (median)
Saved
0.034%
11 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.67/day
active 73% of days
Peak time
17:00 UTC
Wednesday

Early reading. We have captured 7 original posts for this account, below the 8 we require before treating a median as settled. The numbers above describe what we have seen so far, not a finished profile of the account.

A typical post picks up 628 interactions against 1.2M followers, an engagement rate of 0.05%. Posts are seen about 33K times each, and 1.92% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.62% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.7 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 73% of days. Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 7 posts sampled, 86% carry an image or video and 14% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 37K interactions, about 59x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #hoyesrisco, #últimahora, #acceleratedwithgoogle. Only 7 original posts have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

Measured over 7 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 23, 2026. Recurring tags: #hoyesrisco, #últimahora, #acceleratedwithgoogle.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.05%, Risco sits above the 25th percentile of the 201,005 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.141%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.141%
p750.671%
p902.53%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 201,005 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,901 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.141%
75th percentile0.671%
90th percentile2.53%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 17:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 17:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 17:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Wednesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Wednesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video86% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link14% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 86% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 14% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 213 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Oct 21, 202659x their median

    The cameraman wasn’t going to let Trump get away with his fake wave BS https://t.co/LOhTdzQIV0

    34K2.5K2535256.3M viewsView on X
  • Aug 14, 202619x their median

    Es falso que se hayan emitido “listas negras”. Ante algunas reacciones al programa de ayer de Derecho de Réplica, aquí va la aclaración: https://t.co/elLz3j6s5o

    2.3K7988.0K5991.3M viewsView on X
  • Oct 2, 20266.0x their median

    Es que te pasaste maquinón, Mike Patton le hizo un verdadero homenaje a Juan Gabriel, interpretando “Hasta que te conocí” con mariachi y todo https://t.co/FlVfyPkIyc

    2.9K66857155166K viewsView on X
  • Aug 14, 20264.0x their median

    No se confundan. La cancelación de visas es arquitectura psicológica y política, no un expediente judicial. Caer en la vulgaridad callejera y el circo mediático solo expone el oportunismo de quienes, desde el conservadurismo entreguista, validan la injerencia y se arrodillan ante EE.UU., queriendo expiar sus culpas. Cabeza fría, rigor normativo y defensa firme de la soberanía.

    5782411.5K166294K viewsView on X
  • Sep 8, 20263.3x their median

    Fracaso educativo. https://t.co/M2sgpHF5OC

    1.3K5371045953K viewsView on X
  • Aug 13, 20263.2x their median

    Desde que ingresé a la Suprema Corte, en diciembre de 2023, hice un compromiso absoluto con el cumplimiento de ejercicio de austeridad republicana a que estamos obligadas las personas servidoras públicas conforme a la Ley y la Constitución. Por ello, ante el inminente envío del proyecto de presupuesto del Poder Judicial de la Federación a la Secretaría de Hacienda, he remitido este escrito al titular del Órgano de Administración Judicial de este Poder. Desafortunadamente, ha generado animosidad negativa en mis compañeros ministros y compañeras ministras, que se reflejó en la sesión del día de hoy. Me comprometí a hacer público el escrito que muestro a continuación:

    1.2K66411133194K viewsView on X
  • Sep 15, 20263.0x their median

    #TeBuscamosGabyCruz Por favor DIFUNDIR Muchas gracias https://t.co/jU1CBeBUbz

    5371.4K2526K viewsView on X
  • Oct 19, 20262.5x their median

    This tired New America bit again? 🙄 You have to ask — what policy failure is Trump trying to distract Americans from this time? Let me repeat: New Mexico was New Mexico long before the United States existed and we’ll be New Mexico forevermore. And while we’re talking about our great state, Americans should also know we’ve been busy delivering universal, no cost child care. We’re also the only state that fully replaced health care subsidies that were gutted by Trump and congressional Republicans. Independent experts say our elections are among the most secure in the nation. It’s just that Trump can’t seem to accept that voters are rewarding Democrats for policies that make life easier for working families. ¡Viva Nuevo Mexico! 🌶️

    1.1K2342442429K viewsView on X
  • Sep 2, 20262.3x their median

    Ante la información publicada este día en primera plana por el periódico Reforma, sobre mi vida personal, mi patrimonio, gastos de lujo y algunas imágenes relacionadas con actividades públicas y privadas, considero importante hacer algunas precisiones. https://t.co/QVjj4ADBGl

    41014879589378K viewsView on X
  • Sep 9, 20261.8x their median

    El abogado de Diego Sebastián N acusado del multihomicidio de Atizapán sobre la condición de su cliente 👇🏼 [ vía @Ferritortola en @elpaismexico ] https://t.co/UMN91wBqCx

    913909420114K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#hoyesrisco#últimahora#acceleratedwithgoogle#campeóngabacho#googleorg

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 628 interactions against 1.2M followers, an engagement rate of 0.05%. Posts are seen about 33K times each, and 1.92% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.62% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.7 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 73% of days. Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 7 posts sampled, 86% carry an image or video and 14% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 37K interactions, about 59x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #hoyesrisco, #últimahora, #acceleratedwithgoogle. Only 7 original posts have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

What is Risco's engagement rate on X?
Risco (@jrisco) has an engagement rate of 0.05%, based on the median interactions across 7 original posts from the last 30 days against 1,247,403 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.05%, Risco sits above the 25th percentile of the 201,005 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @jrisco have real engagement?
There is not yet enough sample to rank this account against others of its size.
When does @jrisco post?
Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.67 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going