Back to @josephjett's profile

Joseph Jett engagement report

@josephjett - 77K followers on X

Measured over 6 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 9, 2026.

Engagement

Per follower
0.811%
of 77K followers
Per impression
0.997%
62K views on a typical post
Reach
81.4%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
622
interactions (median)
Saved
0.058%
36 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.5/day
active 17% of days
Peak time
21:00 UTC
Tuesday

Early reading. We have captured 6 original posts for this account, below the 8 we require before treating a median as settled. The numbers above describe what we have seen so far, not a finished profile of the account.

A typical post picks up 622 interactions against 77K followers, an engagement rate of 0.811%. Posts are seen about 62K times each, and 0.997% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 81.5% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.5 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 17% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 21:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 6 posts sampled, 50% carry an image or video and 33% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 6.9K interactions, about 11x its own typical post. Only 6 original posts have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

Measured over 6 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 9, 2026.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.811%, Joseph Jett sits above the 75th percentile of the 156,969 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the top 25% band, which runs 0.604% to 2.32%.

p100.003%
p250.022%
p50 (median)0.128%
p750.604%
p902.32%
p9983.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 156,969 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 26,068 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.003%
25th percentile0.022%
50th percentile0.128%
75th percentile0.604%
90th percentile2.32%
99th percentile83.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 21:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 21:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 21:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Tuesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Tuesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video50% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link33% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 50% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 33% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 395 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 7, 202611x their median

    HODGES: Witkoff and Kushner achieved absolutely zero, at least nothing positive, during their trip. The disgusting sucking up to Putin on display by Witkoff and Kushner was hard to even watch. It's embarrassing. And then they went to Kyiv to basically deliver Kremlin's message, you know, nothing new, nothing, whatever. At the same time, Russians were killing innocent civilians on the sidelines of this meeting. So yeah, nothing good came out of that. And nothing ever will come out of it. Because Trump administration still doesn't understand or care about the origin of the conflict. All they want is to get credit for stopping it. They want Russia to get what it wants, and then let's get on with business. That's their entire approach. Of course, with that level of understanding and thinking, Ukrainians will never accept that. It was brilliant that Zelenskyy invited British, German, and French participation so that they could all see this nonsense firsthand. And so Trump administration has never had real leverage over Ukraine anyway. I think Ukrainians played along as far as they could in hopes that there would be a restart of Patriot. But I think now that's not going to happen, and so there's nothing cheerful to report at this point.

    5.1K1.6K1606259K viewsView on X
  • Sep 8, 20263.1x their median

    The Trump administration is moving to legalize corruption. Under Trump the SEC is seeking to rescind a rule that stops private equity funds from bribing public officials. They say the rule stifles "free speech" and had too many unintended consequences. https://t.co/jGf6dyiQGR

    1.3K534184366K viewsView on X
  • Sep 8, 20261.8x their median

    This is a bombshell. It has now been confirmed by Emirati sources that Netanyahu was warned about a planned Hamas attack ahead of October 7. https://t.co/m36eEI4u7g

    7602794827151K viewsView on X
  • Sep 3, 2026

    The Department of Defense is attempting to redirect National Institute of Health money to bolster the Pentagon’s budget, according to the top Democrat on the House Appropriations Committee. https://t.co/stgMP0PJbM

    69515626K viewsView on X
  • Sep 6, 2026

    🚨🚨 An Armed individual lunged at Dr. Amy Acton during her Canfield Fair appearance Sunday, injuring multiple people, per her campaign’s statement. Ohio State Highway Patrol took the person into custody. “This kind of violence has no place in Ohio,” said comms director Addie Bullock. Investigation ongoing.

    684751121K viewsView on X
  • Sep 8, 2026

    RT @peterbakernyt: Leopold Aschenbrenner was dubbed the “Nostradamus of AI." His spectacular $34 billion loss "reveals how eager Silicon Va…

    06005 viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 622 interactions against 77K followers, an engagement rate of 0.811%. Posts are seen about 62K times each, and 0.997% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 81.5% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.5 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 17% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 21:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 6 posts sampled, 50% carry an image or video and 33% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 6.9K interactions, about 11x its own typical post. Only 6 original posts have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

What is Joseph Jett's engagement rate on X?
Joseph Jett (@josephjett) has an engagement rate of 0.811%, based on the median interactions across 6 original posts from the last 30 days against 76,656 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.811%, Joseph Jett sits above the 75th percentile of the 156,969 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @josephjett have real engagement?
There is not yet enough sample to rank this account against others of its size.
When does @josephjett post?
Most posts go out around 21:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.5 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going