Back to @jonnajarian's profile

Jon Najarian engagement report

@jonnajarian - 329K followers on X

Measured over 32 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 4, 2026.

Engagement

Top 10% for its size
Per follower
0.641%
of 329K followers
Per impression
2.99%
70K views on a typical post
Reach
21.4%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
2.1K
interactions (median)
Saved
0.104%
73 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
3/day
active 17% of days
Peak time
17:00 UTC
Tuesday

A typical post picks up 2.1K interactions against 329K followers, an engagement rate of 0.641%. Measured over 32 original posts, its engagement rate beats 91% of 6,874 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 70K times each, and 2.99% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 21.4% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 17% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 32 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 70K interactions, about 33x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #itsnotanoption, #wannabet.

Measured over 32 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 4, 2026. Recurring tags: #itsnotanoption, #wannabet.

Compared with accounts its own size

Jon Najarian's engagement rate beats 91% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (6,874 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 8 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 79% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.641%, Jon Najarian sits above the 75th percentile of the 66,128 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the top 25% band, which runs 0.499% to 2.09%.

p100.002%
p250.016%
p50 (median)0.1%
p750.499%
p902.09%
p99119.9%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 66,128 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 57,111 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.016%
50th percentile0.1%
75th percentile0.499%
90th percentile2.09%
99th percentile119.9%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 17:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 17:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 17:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Tuesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Tuesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video100% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link3% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 100% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 3% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 154 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 3, 202633x their median

    Feminist MMA fighter beleived she could beat any man. https://t.co/TlJ6tztUXH

    61K5.1K2.8K1.0K4.7M viewsView on X
  • Sep 2, 202631x their median

    🚨 IT'S OFFICIAL: First openly gay judge of Bexar County, Texas Rosie Speedlin-Gonzalez has been BANNED FOR LIFE from EVER serving on the bench again after she unlawfully ordered an attorney to be handcuffed GOOD RIDDANCE, DEI πŸ‘‹πŸ» She's now signed a formal agreement providing for her resignation and lifetime ban β€” Christian Post

    55K8.6K1.4K4343.0M viewsView on X
  • Oct 30, 202531x their median

    Doxxing ICE agents is a federal crime punishable by up to (5) years on each count Raise your hand βœ‹οΈ if you want @Sec_Noem to submit a criminal referral to the DOJ on (Rep) Mike Quigley (IL) for posting the locations of ICE agts on his X acct This cannot go unpunished πŸ‘‡ https://t.co/ki4Z3QAWpW

    42K15K7.2K920393K viewsView on X
  • Sep 1, 202628x their median

    Watch this and try not to cry… Marcus Coleman, whose daughter was paralyzed by an illegal alien truck driver, RIPS into Democrats: "I reject your guys' sympathy to be honest with you... My daughter doesn't deserve this... I hold each and every one of you responsible for it." BOOM https://t.co/b5lkaoz48j

    45K12K906596630K viewsView on X
  • Sep 2, 202621x their median

    Technologie πŸ€– Europe πŸ‡ͺπŸ‡Ί VS Γ‰tats-Unis πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ https://t.co/AUiKUTl5Um

    36K8.0K5945901.3M viewsView on X
  • Sep 2, 202615x their median

    You really should watch this video. It is the kind of video that will likely never become outdated. In Jerusalem, a Muslim Palestinian woman attempt to stab an Israeli soldier but fails, she is struck forcefully and falls to be ground. https://t.co/4uY95zBPTf

    27K2.7K1.6K1711.3M viewsView on X
  • Aug 31, 202613x their median

    A leftist ran up to Scuba Steve @ScubaSteve026 and tried to steal his American flag at the wave today... the Portland Patriots were not having it ~ FAFO Portland Patriots Flag Wave 08.31.26 Video: X: RIDER Chronicles @RiderChronic YouTube: RIDERCHRONICLES https://t.co/7L6QPfYZ1A

    23K2.5K1.7K2531.3M viewsView on X
  • Aug 31, 202613x their median

    Epic takedown. https://t.co/XqiOUSNnEn

    23K3.4K12349188K viewsView on X
  • Aug 31, 20264.8x their median

    🚨 SPACEX TRIED TO CATCH A 70-METER BUILDING FALLING FROM SPACE - AND THIS HAPPENED Super Heavy booster coming back, Mechazilla arms closing... then fireball πŸ”₯πŸš€ What most don't know: Starship Super Heavy = 71m tall, 33 Raptor engines, 7,500 tons thrust. SpaceX catch system = no landing legs to save weight - has to be caught mid-air like chopsticks grabbing a skyscraper. Fail = big boom but data = gold. That London account got 4M likes because everyone wants to see rockets get caught. They don't land rockets anymore. They catch them.

    8.9K81022780521K viewsView on X
  • Sep 3, 20264.2x their median

    Never deleting this app. https://t.co/ErUk5P8mBL

    8.1K55268869K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#itsnotanoption#wannabet

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 2.1K interactions against 329K followers, an engagement rate of 0.641%. Measured over 32 original posts, its engagement rate beats 91% of 6,874 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 70K times each, and 2.99% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 21.4% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 17% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 32 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 70K interactions, about 33x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #itsnotanoption, #wannabet.

What is Jon Najarian's engagement rate on X?
Jon Najarian (@jonnajarian) has an engagement rate of 0.641%, based on the median interactions across 32 original posts from the last 30 days against 328,756 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.641%, Jon Najarian sits above the 75th percentile of the 66,128 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @jonnajarian have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 91% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (6,874 accounts), which puts it in the top 10% for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @jonnajarian post?
Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 3 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going